Literature DB >> 24876437

Continuous glucose monitoring and trend accuracy: news about a trend compass.

Matthew Signal1, Rebecca Gottlieb2, Aaron Le Compte3, J Geoffrey Chase3.   

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are being increasingly used to monitor glycemia in people with diabetes. One advantage with CGM is the ability to monitor the trend of sensor glucose (SG) over time. However, there are few metrics available for assessing the trend accuracy of CGM devices. The aim of this study was to develop an easy to interpret tool for assessing trend accuracy of CGM data. SG data from CGM were compared to hourly blood glucose (BG) measurements and trend accuracy was quantified using the dot product. Trend accuracy results are displayed on the Trend Compass, which depicts trend accuracy as a function of BG. A trend performance table and Trend Index (TI) metric are also proposed. The Trend Compass was tested using simulated CGM data with varying levels of error and variability, as well as real clinical CGM data. The results show that the Trend Compass is an effective tool for differentiating good trend accuracy from poor trend accuracy, independent of glycemic variability. Furthermore, the real clinical data show that the Trend Compass assesses trend accuracy independent of point bias error. Finally, the importance of assessing trend accuracy as a function of BG level is highlighted in a case example of low and falling BG data, with corresponding rising SG data. This study developed a simple to use tool for quantifying trend accuracy. The resulting trend accuracy is easily interpreted on the Trend Compass plot, and if required, performance table and TI metric.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trend Compass; accuracy; blood glucose; continuous glucose monitoring; metric; trend

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876437      PMCID: PMC4455373          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814533091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  24 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose levels improves glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Cynthia Fritschi
Journal:  Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2011-10-19

Review 3.  Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Improved glycemic control in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Dorothee Deiss; Jan Bolinder; Jean-Pierre Riveline; Tadej Battelino; Emanuele Bosi; Nadia Tubiana-Rufi; David Kerr; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Fully integrated artificial pancreas in type 1 diabetes: modular closed-loop glucose control maintains near normoglycemia.

Authors:  Marc Breton; Anne Farret; Daniela Bruttomesso; Stacey Anderson; Lalo Magni; Stephen Patek; Chiara Dalla Man; Jerome Place; Susan Demartini; Simone Del Favero; Chiara Toffanin; Colleen Hughes-Karvetski; Eyal Dassau; Howard Zisser; Francis J Doyle; Giuseppe De Nicolao; Angelo Avogaro; Claudio Cobelli; Eric Renard; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 9.461

Review 6.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring system for treatment of diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  L B E A Hoeks; W L Greven; H W de Valk
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Hypoglycemia detection in critical care using continuous glucose monitors: an in silico proof of concept analysis.

Authors:  Christopher G Pretty; J Geoffrey Chase; Aaron Le Compte; Geoffrey M Shaw; Matthew Signal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-01-01

8.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Fully automated closed-loop insulin delivery versus semiautomated hybrid control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using an artificial pancreas.

Authors:  Stuart A Weinzimer; Garry M Steil; Karena L Swan; Jim Dziura; Natalie Kurtz; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data.

Authors:  John C Pickup; Suzanne C Freeman; Alex J Sutton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  Autoregressive Modeling of Drift and Random Error to Characterize a Continuous Intravascular Glucose Monitoring Sensor.

Authors:  Tony Zhou; Jennifer L Dickson; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-14

2.  Accuracy and reliability of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring device in critically ill patients.

Authors:  S Rijkenberg; S C van Steen; J H DeVries; P H J van der Voort
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Measures Can Be Used for Glycemic Control in the ICU: An In-Silico Study.

Authors:  Tony Zhou; Jennifer L Dickson; Geoffrey M Shaw; J Geoffrey Chase
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-11-06

Review 4.  Neonatal hypoglycemia: continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Rajesh Shah; Christopher J D McKinlay; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 5.  Continuous glucose monitoring in the ICU: clinical considerations and consensus.

Authors:  James S Krinsley; J Geoffrey Chase; Jan Gunst; Johan Martensson; Marcus J Schultz; Fabio S Taccone; Jan Wernerman; Julien Bohe; Christophe De Block; Thomas Desaive; Pierre Kalfon; Jean-Charles Preiser
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 6.  Continuous glucose monitoring in neonates: a review.

Authors:  Christopher J D McKinlay; J Geoffrey Chase; Jennifer Dickson; Deborah L Harris; Jane M Alsweiler; Jane E Harding
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2017-10-17

Review 7.  Self-measurement of Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Is There Only One Future?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Andreas Stuhr; Adam Brown; Guido Freckmann; Marc D Breton; Steven Russell; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.