Literature DB >> 24875187

Genome-wide estimation of linkage disequilibrium from population-level high-throughput sequencing data.

Takahiro Maruki1, Michael Lynch2.   

Abstract

Rapidly improving sequencing technologies provide unprecedented opportunities for analyzing genome-wide patterns of polymorphisms. In particular, they have great potential for linkage-disequilibrium analyses on both global and local genetic scales, which will substantially improve our ability to derive evolutionary inferences. However, there are some difficulties with analyzing high-throughput sequencing data, including high error rates associated with base reads and complications from the random sampling of sequenced chromosomes in diploid organisms. To overcome these difficulties, we developed a maximum-likelihood estimator of linkage disequilibrium for use with error-prone sampling data. Computer simulations indicate that the estimator is nearly unbiased with a sampling variance at high coverage asymptotically approaching the value expected when all relevant information is accurately estimated. The estimator does not require phasing of haplotypes and enables the estimation of linkage disequilibrium even when all individual reads cover just single polymorphic sites.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  linkage disequilibrium; population genomics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24875187      PMCID: PMC4125401          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.165514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  60 in total

1.  Gene conversion and different population histories may explain the contrast between polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium levels.

Authors:  L Frisse; R R Hudson; A Bartoszewicz; J D Wall; J Donfack; A Di Rienzo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-08-29       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Estimating recombination rates from population-genetic data.

Authors:  Michael P H Stumpf; Gilean A T McVean
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Analytic computation of the expectation of the linkage disequilibrium coefficient r2.

Authors:  Yun S Song; Jun S Song
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-09-23       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Inferences about linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations.

Authors:  Jun Cao; Korbinian Schneeberger; Stephan Ossowski; Torsten Günther; Sebastian Bender; Joffrey Fitz; Daniel Koenig; Christa Lanz; Oliver Stegle; Christoph Lippert; Xi Wang; Felix Ott; Jonas Müller; Carlos Alonso-Blanco; Karsten Borgwardt; Karl J Schmid; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Assignment of chromosomal locations for unassigned SNPs/scaffolds based on pair-wise linkage disequilibrium estimates.

Authors:  Mehar S Khatkar; Matthew Hobbs; Markus Neuditschko; Johann Sölkner; Frank W Nicholas; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The fine-scale structure of recombination rate variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Gilean A T McVean; Simon R Myers; Sarah Hunt; Panos Deloukas; David R Bentley; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  HI: haplotype improver using paired-end short reads.

Authors:  Quan Long; Daniel MacArthur; Zemin Ning; Chris Tyler-Smith
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Genotype-Frequency Estimation from High-Throughput Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Takahiro Maruki; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome-wide linkage-disequilibrium profiles from single individuals.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Sen Xu; Takahiro Maruki; Xiaoqian Jiang; Peter Pfaffelhuber; Bernhard Haubold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genetic control of male production in Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Ye; Cécile Molinier; Chaoxian Zhao; Christoph R Haag; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Population Genomics of Daphnia pulex.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Ryan Gutenkunst; Matthew Ackerman; Ken Spitze; Zhiqiang Ye; Takahiro Maruki; Zhiyuan Jia
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Scalable bias-corrected linkage disequilibrium estimation under genotype uncertainty.

Authors:  David Gerard
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.832

6.  Genotype Calling from Population-Genomic Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Takahiro Maruki; Michael Lynch
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 7.  On the Extent of Linkage Disequilibrium in the Genome of Farm Animals.

Authors:  Saber Qanbari
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Inferring Population Size History from Large Samples of Genome-Wide Molecular Data - An Approximate Bayesian Computation Approach.

Authors:  Simon Boitard; Willy Rodríguez; Flora Jay; Stefano Mona; Frédéric Austerlitz
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Linkage Disequilibrium Estimation in Low Coverage High-Throughput Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Timothy P Bilton; John C McEwan; Shannon M Clarke; Rudiger Brauning; Tracey C van Stijn; Suzanne J Rowe; Ken G Dodds
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.