Maria Atienza-Amores1, Elena Guerini-Rocco2, Robert A Soslow3, Kay J Park3, Britta Weigelt4. 1. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Institute of Biomedicine of Seville/HUVR/CSIC/University of Seville, Seville, Spain. 2. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Italy. 3. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: weigeltb@mskcc.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Small cell carcinoma (SmCC) of the female genital tract constitutes a diagnostic and clinical challenge given its rarity and the lack of standardized therapeutic approaches. Here we review the morphological, clinical and molecular features of gynecologic SmCCs and discuss potential areas for future research. METHODS: Data for this review article were identified by searches of PubMed, EMBASE and the Internet using the search terms "small cell carcinoma" or "neuroendocrine carcinoma" and "gynecologic", "uterine cervix", "cervix", "uterus", "endometrium", "ovary", "vagina", "fallopian tube" or "vulva", and research articles published in English between 1972 and February 2014 were included. RESULTS: SmCCs arising from different organs within the gynecologic tract share the same histopathologic characteristics, which closely resemble those of small cell lung carcinoma. The expression of at least one immunohistochemical neuroendocrine marker is a common finding. The uterine cervix is the most frequent site of SmCC in the female genital tract. HPV infection seems to play a role in the development of cervical SmCC but not in cancers of other gynecologic sites. FIGO stage is an established prognostic factor, in particular in SCCs of the cervix. Irrespective of the site, SmCCs of the gynecologic tract display an aggressive clinical behavior with few reported long-term survivors. The therapeutic management includes surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential differences in etiology and risk factors, SmCCs from different sites of the gynecologic tract have similar morphologic appearances and clinical behavior. Recent genomic analyses of small cell carcinoma of the lung have revealed potential driver genomic alterations. We posit that the comprehensive genomic characterization of gynecologic SmCCs may lead to the identification of markers that result in an improvement of diagnostic reproducibility of SmCCs of the gynecologic tract, and of molecular aberrations that may be exploited therapeutically in subgroups of the disease.
OBJECTIVE:Small cell carcinoma (SmCC) of the female genital tract constitutes a diagnostic and clinical challenge given its rarity and the lack of standardized therapeutic approaches. Here we review the morphological, clinical and molecular features of gynecologic SmCCs and discuss potential areas for future research. METHODS: Data for this review article were identified by searches of PubMed, EMBASE and the Internet using the search terms "small cell carcinoma" or "neuroendocrine carcinoma" and "gynecologic", "uterine cervix", "cervix", "uterus", "endometrium", "ovary", "vagina", "fallopian tube" or "vulva", and research articles published in English between 1972 and February 2014 were included. RESULTS: SmCCs arising from different organs within the gynecologic tract share the same histopathologic characteristics, which closely resemble those of small cell lung carcinoma. The expression of at least one immunohistochemical neuroendocrine marker is a common finding. The uterine cervix is the most frequent site of SmCC in the female genital tract. HPV infection seems to play a role in the development of cervical SmCC but not in cancers of other gynecologic sites. FIGO stage is an established prognostic factor, in particular in SCCs of the cervix. Irrespective of the site, SmCCs of the gynecologic tract display an aggressive clinical behavior with few reported long-term survivors. The therapeutic management includes surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential differences in etiology and risk factors, SmCCs from different sites of the gynecologic tract have similar morphologic appearances and clinical behavior. Recent genomic analyses of small cell carcinoma of the lung have revealed potential driver genomic alterations. We posit that the comprehensive genomic characterization of gynecologic SmCCs may lead to the identification of markers that result in an improvement of diagnostic reproducibility of SmCCs of the gynecologic tract, and of molecular aberrations that may be exploited therapeutically in subgroups of the disease.
Authors: Anastasiya Atanasova Chokoeva; Georgi Tchernev; Elena Castelli; Elisabetta Orlando; Shyam B Verma; Markus Grebe; Uwe Wollina Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2015-05-01
Authors: Marcela S Cavalcanti; Anne M Schultheis; Caleb Ho; Lu Wang; Deborah F DeLair; Britta Weigelt; Ginger Gardner; Stuart M Lichtman; Meera Hameed; Kay J Park Journal: Int J Gynecol Pathol Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Deyin Xing; Gang Zheng; John Kenneth Schoolmeester; Zaibo Li; Aparna Pallavajjala; Lisa Haley; Michael G Conner; Russell Vang; Chien-Fu Hung; Tzyy-Choou Wu; Brigitte M Ronnett Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Niamh Conlon; Annacarolina Silva; Esther Guerra; Petar Jelinic; Brooke A Schlappe; Narciso Olvera; Jennifer J Mueller; Carmen Tornos; Achim A Jungbluth; Robert H Young; Esther Oliva; Douglas Levine; Robert A Soslow Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 6.394