Xiaohui Duan1, Xiaohua Ban2, Xiang Zhang1, Huijun Hu1, Guozhao Li1, Dongye Wang1, Charles Qian Wang1,3, Fang Zhang1, Jun Shen4. 1. Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, China. 2. Medical Imaging and Minimally Invasive Interventional Center & State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. 3. JMO, Westmead Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 4. Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 107 Yanjiang Road West, Guangzhou, 510120, China. shenjun@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine MR imaging features and staging accuracy of neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the uterine cervix with pathological correlations. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with histologically proven NECs, 60 patients with squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and 30 patients with adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix were included. The clinical data, pathological findings, and MRI findings were reviewed retrospectively. MRI features of cervical NECs, SCCs, and adenocarcinomas were compared, and MRI staging of cervical NECs was compared with the pathological staging. RESULTS: Cervical NECs showed a higher tendency toward a homogeneous signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging and a homogeneous enhancement pattern, as well as a lower ADC value of tumour and a higher incidence of lymphadenopathy, compared with SCCs and adenocarcinomas (P < 0.05). An ADC value cutoff of 0.90 × 10-3 mm2/s was robust for differentiation between cervical NECs and other cervical cancers, with a sensitivity of 63.3 % and a specificity of 95 %. In 21 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy, the overall accuracy of tumour staging by MR imaging was 85.7 % with reference to pathology staging. CONCLUSION: Homogeneous lesion texture and low ADC value are likely suggestive features of cervical NECs and MR imaging is reliable for the staging of cervical NECs. KEY POINTS: • Cervical NECs show a tendency of lesion homogeneity and lymphadenopathy • Low ADC values are found in cervical NECs • MRI is an accurate imaging modality for the cervical NEC staging.
OBJECTIVE: To determine MR imaging features and staging accuracy of neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the uterine cervix with pathological correlations. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with histologically proven NECs, 60 patients with squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and 30 patients with adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix were included. The clinical data, pathological findings, and MRI findings were reviewed retrospectively. MRI features of cervical NECs, SCCs, and adenocarcinomas were compared, and MRI staging of cervical NECs was compared with the pathological staging. RESULTS: Cervical NECs showed a higher tendency toward a homogeneous signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging and a homogeneous enhancement pattern, as well as a lower ADC value of tumour and a higher incidence of lymphadenopathy, compared with SCCs and adenocarcinomas (P < 0.05). An ADC value cutoff of 0.90 × 10-3 mm2/s was robust for differentiation between cervical NECs and other cervical cancers, with a sensitivity of 63.3 % and a specificity of 95 %. In 21 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy, the overall accuracy of tumour staging by MR imaging was 85.7 % with reference to pathology staging. CONCLUSION: Homogeneous lesion texture and low ADC value are likely suggestive features of cervical NECs and MR imaging is reliable for the staging of cervical NECs. KEY POINTS: • Cervical NECs show a tendency of lesion homogeneity and lymphadenopathy • Low ADC values are found in cervical NECs • MRI is an accurate imaging modality for the cervical NEC staging.
Authors: Corinne Balleyguier; E Sala; T Da Cunha; A Bergman; B Brkljacic; F Danza; R Forstner; B Hamm; R Kubik-Huch; C Lopez; R Manfredi; J McHugo; L Oleaga; K Togashi; K Kinkel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Georgia A McCann; Christina E Boutsicaris; Megan M Preston; Floor J Backes; Eric L Eisenhauer; Jeffrey M Fowler; David E Cohn; Larry J Copeland; Ritu Salani; David M O'Malley Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2013-01-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Ali Khader; Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan; Lacey J McIntosh; Babina Gosangi; Jeremy R Wortman; Christoph Wald; Richard Thomas Journal: Eur J Radiol Open Date: 2022-07-26
Authors: Clemens B Tempfer; Iris Tischoff; Askin Dogan; Ziad Hilal; Beate Schultheis; Peter Kern; Günther A Rezniczek Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 4.430