Literature DB >> 2487399

Microtopography and soft tissue response.

C E Campbell1, A F von Recum.   

Abstract

Implants placed in soft tissue evoke a foreign body reaction. Polymeric implants having smooth surfaces, such as silicone rubber implants, develop a nonadherent fibrogranulous tissue capsule which contracts over time and stiffens. Conventional porous implants, such as those made from textiles, usually have pores larger than 20 microns and they become infiltrated with inflammatory tissue. The in vivo cell reaction to polymeric surfaces having pores smaller than 10 microns has not been investigated systematically. In this study the histocompatibility of materials having mean pore diameters from 0.4 to 10 microns was assessed. A material available with several different defined pore sizes Versapor filter material) was tested in vivo to determine relation between pore size and qualitative tissue response. Silicone-coated samples were also tested to determine the dependence of the observed tissue response on the implant surface chemistry. Results showed nonadherent, contracting capsules around implants having pore diameters smaller than 0.5 microns. Implants with pores ranging from 1.4 to 1.9 microns evoked thin, tightly adherent fibrous capsules without inflammatory cells. Porosities of 3.3 microns and larger became infiltrated with inflammatory tissue. Results indicate that the observed tissue response is predominantly dependent on implant surface topography and that variation in implant material may have little effect. It is concluded that a defined surface topography of 1 to 2 microns appears to allow direct fibroblast attachment to the surface independent of its chemical or electrochemical nature. Attached fibroblasts then produce a minimal connective tissue response to the implant and prevent or diminish the presence of inflammatory cells at the implant/tissue interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2487399     DOI: 10.3109/08941938909016503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Surg        ISSN: 0894-1939            Impact factor:   2.533


  14 in total

Review 1.  Effects of the chemical structure and the surface properties of polymeric biomaterials on their biocompatibility.

Authors:  You-Xiong Wang; John L Robertson; William B Spillman; Richard O Claus
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Tissue reactions to polyethylene implants with different surface topography.

Authors:  A Rosengren; L M Bjursten; N Danielsen; H Persson; M Kober
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  A percutaneous device to study glucose kinetics in subcutaneous tissue fluid.

Authors:  M Gerritsen; J A Lutterman; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Biomaterial topography alters healing in vivo and monocyte/macrophage activation in vitro.

Authors:  Paige C S Bota; Angela M B Collie; Pauli Puolakkainen; Robert B Vernon; E Helene Sage; Buddy D Ratner; Patrick S Stayton
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Fabrication and cell affinity of biomimetic structured PLGA/articular cartilage ECM composite scaffold.

Authors:  Xifu Zheng; Fei Yang; Shenguo Wang; Shibi Lu; Weiguo Zhang; Shuyun Liu; Jingxiang Huang; Aiyuan Wang; Baosheng Yin; Ning Ma; Li Zhang; Wenjing Xu; Quanyi Guo
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Sol-gel method to fabricate CaP scaffolds by robocasting for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Manuel Houmard; Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  The difference of fibroblast behavior on titanium substrata with different surface characteristics.

Authors:  Akihiro Furuhashi; Yasunori Ayukawa; Ikiru Atsuta; Hideyuki Okawachi; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Does drainage hole size influence adhesion on ventricular catheters?

Authors:  Carolyn A Harris; James P McAllister
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 9.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and the foreign body response-part I: theoretical framework.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

10.  A review of the management of implanted medical devices for diabetes: trends and directions.

Authors:  Carl Edman; Darrel Drinan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.