Literature DB >> 24871764

Aneurysm pressure measurement before and after placement of a Pipeline stent: feasibility study using a 0.014 inch pressure wire for coronary intervention.

Satoshi Tateshima1, Jesse G Jones1, Fernando Mayor Basto1, Fernando Vinuela1, Gary R Duckwiler1.   

Abstract

Flow-diverting stents have provided a new endovascular capacity to reconstruct an intracranial aneurysm with its diseased parent artery. The results of first-generation flow diversion stents have been encouraging, with even large or giant treated aneurysms achieving complete angiographic occlusion at 12-month follow-up. Numerous clinical reports have described a slow progressive thrombosis pattern and gradual increase in rate of complete aneurysm obliteration over time. Despite promising early results, some complications specific to flow-diverting stents have been encountered. Chief among them is delayed aneurysm rupture. This complication did not emerge with stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms, and the underlying cause has not been established. However, new evidence suggests that persistent, or even increased, aneurysm pressure after stent placement may play a role in some delayed ruptures. We sought to evaluate this phenomenon by measuring intrasaccular pressure before and after stent placement using two different 0.014 inch coronary pressure measurement wires. Two patients with giant internal carotid artery aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents were evaluated. Before and after stent deployment, intrasaccular aneurysm and systemic arterial pressures were recorded for 60 s and compared. In both cases, intrasaccular pressure measurement with the use of 0.014 inch pressure wire system was feasible; the pressure wires could be pushed out of the microcatheter placed in the aneurysms without friction or unexpected microcatheter motion. Despite successful flow-diverting stent deployment and angiographic flow diversion effects with excellent wall opposition across the aneurysm necks, there was no significant difference between intrasaccular and systemic pressures. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aneurysm; Angiography; Blood Flow; Blood Pressure; Flow Diverter

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24871764     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  7 in total

1.  In vitro, contrast agent-based evaluation of the influence of flow diverter size and position on intra-aneurysmal flow dynamics using syngo iFlow.

Authors:  Giorgio Franco Maria Cattaneo; Andreas Ding; Tobias Jost; Désirée Ley; Ruben Mühl-Bennighaus; Umut Yilmaz; Heiko Körner; Wolfgang Reith; Andreas Simgen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Experimental Analysis of Pressure and Flow Alterations During and After Insertion of a Multilayer Flow Modulator into an AAA Model with Incorporated Branch.

Authors:  Simon Tupin; Kei Takase; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Delayed aneurysm rupture due to residual blood flow at the inflow zone of the intracranial paraclinoid internal carotid aneurysm treated with the Pipeline embolization device: Histopathological investigation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ikeda; Akira Ishii; Takayuki Kikuchi; Mitsushige Ando; Hideo Chihara; Daisuke Arai; Etsuko Hattori; Susumu Miyamoto
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Hemodynamic Analysis of Postoperative Rupture of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms after Placement of Flow-Diverting Stents: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  W Li; Z Tian; W Zhu; Y S Zhang; K Wang; Y Zhang; Y Wang; X Yang; J Liu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Retrospective analysis of intracranial aneurysms after flow diverter treatment including color-coded imaging (syngo iFlow) as a predictor of aneurysm occlusion.

Authors:  Andreas Simgen; Christine Mayer; Michael Kettner; Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus; Wolfgang Reith; Umut Yilmaz
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 1.764

6.  Hemodynamic analysis and implantation strategies of delayed intracranial aneurysm rupture after flow diverter treatment.

Authors:  Shiyao Chen; Bin Bai; Nan Lv; Yunzhang Cheng; Bin Ji
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12

Review 7.  Mechanism of Action and Biology of Flow Diverters in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Krishnan Ravindran; Amanda M Casabella; Juan Cebral; Waleed Brinjikji; David F Kallmes; Ram Kadirvel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.654

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.