Literature DB >> 24871551

Investigation of dry powder inhaler (DPI) resistance and aerosol dispersion timing on emitted aerosol aerodynamic particle sizing by multistage cascade impactor when sampled volume is reduced from compendial value of 4 L.

Hlack Mohammed1, Jan Arp, Frank Chambers, Mark Copley, Volker Glaab, Mark Hammond, Derek Solomon, Kerry Bradford, Theresa Russell, Yvonne Sizer, Steven C Nichols, Daryl L Roberts, Christopher Shelton, Roland Greguletz, Jolyon P Mitchell.   

Abstract

Compendial methods determining dry powder inhaler (DPI)-emitted aerosol aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) collect a 4-L air sample containing the aerosol bolus, where the flow, which propagates through the cascade impactor (CI) measurement system from the vacuum source, is used to actuate the inhaler. A previous article described outcomes with two CIs (Andersen eight-stage cascade impactor (ACI) and Next-Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI)) when the air sample volume was ≤4 L with moderate-resistance DPIs. This article extends that work, examining the hypothesis that DPI flow resistance may be a factor in determining outcomes. APSD measurements were made using the same CI systems with inhalers representing low and high flow resistance extremes (Cyclohaler® and HandiHaler® DPIs, respectively). The ratio of sample volume to internal dead space (normalized volume (V*)) was varied from 0.25 to 1.98 (NGI) and from 0.43 to 3.46 (ACI). Inhaler resistance was a contributing factor to the rate of bolus transfer; the higher resistance DPI completing bolus relocation to the NGI pre-separator via the inlet when V* was as small as 0.25, whereas only ca. 50% of the bolus mass was collected at this condition with the Cyclohaler® DPI. Size fractionation of the bolus from either DPI was completed within the ACI at smaller values of V* than within the NGI. Bolus transfer from the Cyclohaler® capsule and from the HandiHaler® to the ACI system were unaffected by the different flow rise time observed in the two different flow controller systems, and the effects the ACI-based on APSD measurements were marginal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24871551      PMCID: PMC4179672          DOI: 10.1208/s12249-014-0111-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech        ISSN: 1530-9932            Impact factor:   3.246


  13 in total

1.  New concept for the variable flow rate Andersen cascade impactor and calibration data.

Authors:  S C Nichols; D R Brown; M Smurthwaite
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  1998

2.  Next generation pharmaceutical impactor (a new impactor for pharmaceutical inhaler testing). Part I: Design.

Authors:  Virgil A Marple; Daryl L Roberts; Francisco J Romay; Nicholas C Miller; Keith G Truman; Michiel Van Oort; Bo Olsson; Michael J Holroyd; Jolyon P Mitchell; Dieter Hochrainer
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003

3.  Next generation pharmaceutical impactor (a new impactor for pharmaceutical inhaler testing). Part II: Archival calibration.

Authors:  Virgil A Marple; Bernard A Olson; Kumaragovindham Santhanakrishnan; Jolyon P Mitchell; Sharon C Murray; Buffy L Hudson-Curtis
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003

4.  Dry powder inhaler device influence on carrier particle performance.

Authors:  Martin J Donovan; Sin Hyen Kim; Venkatramanan Raman; Hugh D Smyth
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.534

5.  Effect of sampling volume on dry powder inhaler (DPI)-emitted aerosol aerodynamic particle size distributions (APSDs) measured by the Next-Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI) and the Andersen eight-stage cascade impactor (ACI).

Authors:  Hlack Mohammed; Daryl L Roberts; Mark Copley; Mark Hammond; Steven C Nichols; Jolyon P Mitchell
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Revised internal volumes of cascade impactors for those provided by mitchell and nagel.

Authors:  M Copley; M Smurthwaite; D L Roberts; J P Mitchell
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2005

7.  Aerodynamic characteristics of a dry powder inhaler at low inhalation flows using a mixing inlet with an Andersen Cascade Impactor.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumar Nadarassan; Khaled H Assi; Henry Chrystyn
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Influence of inspiratory flow rate upon the effect of a Turbuhaler.

Authors:  S Pedersen; O R Hansen; G Fuglsang
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Critical aspects of the function of inspiratory flow driven inhalers.

Authors:  B Olsson; L Asking
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  1994

10.  Inhalation profiles in asthmatics and COPD patients: reproducibility and effect of instruction.

Authors:  Mariëlle E A C Broeders; Johan Molema; Wim C J Hop; Hans T M Folgering
Journal:  J Aerosol Med       Date:  2003
View more
  2 in total

1.  The contribution of patients' lung function to the inspiratory airflow rate achievable through a DPIs' simulator reproducing different intrinsic resistance rates.

Authors:  Roberto W Dal Negro; Paola Turco; Massimiliano Povero
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2021-04-15

2.  Lung Function Can Predict the Expected Inspiratory Airflow Rate through Dry Powder Inhalers in Asthmatic Adolescents.

Authors:  Roberto Walter Dal Negro; Paola Turco; Massimiliano Povero
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.