Literature DB >> 14572327

Next generation pharmaceutical impactor (a new impactor for pharmaceutical inhaler testing). Part II: Archival calibration.

Virgil A Marple1, Bernard A Olson, Kumaragovindham Santhanakrishnan, Jolyon P Mitchell, Sharon C Murray, Buffy L Hudson-Curtis.   

Abstract

A new seven-stage cascade impactor, the Next Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI), has been developed for the pharmaceutical industry. A calibration following "good laboratory practice (GLP)" procedures has been performed on a specific archival NGI, deemed to be representative of all NGIs. Thus, this impactor had nozzle dimensions for each stage manufactured close to the middle of the tolerance band for the design specification, and therefore the average nozzle diameter was equal to the nominal value for that stage. An essential feature of the NGI is that it is designed to operate at any flow rate between 30 and 100 L/min. Thus, the calibration was made at inlet flow rates of 30, 60 and 100 L/min representing the lower bound, mid-region and upper bound of the specified range of operation for the impactor. The calibration data were then used to develop equations that predict the particle cut size for all components of the impactor at any flow rate from 30 to 100 L/min.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14572327     DOI: 10.1089/089426803769017668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med        ISSN: 0894-2684


  18 in total

1.  Effect of sampling volume on dry powder inhaler (DPI)-emitted aerosol aerodynamic particle size distributions (APSDs) measured by the Next-Generation Pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI) and the Andersen eight-stage cascade impactor (ACI).

Authors:  Hlack Mohammed; Daryl L Roberts; Mark Copley; Mark Hammond; Steven C Nichols; Jolyon P Mitchell
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  An investigation into the dispersion mechanisms of ternary dry powder inhaler formulations by the quantification of interparticulate forces.

Authors:  Matthew D Jones; Jennifer C Hooton; Michelle L Dawson; Alan R Ferrie; Robert Price
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  In vitro and in vivo aspects of cascade impactor tests and inhaler performance: a review.

Authors:  Jolyon Mitchell; Steve Newman; Hak-Kim Chan
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 4.  Minimizing variability of cascade impaction measurements in inhalers and nebulizers.

Authors:  Matthew Bonam; David Christopher; David Cipolla; Brent Donovan; David Goodwin; Susan Holmes; Svetlana Lyapustina; Jolyon Mitchell; Steve Nichols; Gunilla Pettersson; Chris Quale; Nagaraja Rao; Dilraj Singh; Terrence Tougas; Mike Van Oort; Bernd Walther; Bruce Wyka
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 3.246

5.  Respirable low-density microparticles formed in situ from aerosolized brittle matrices.

Authors:  Alan B Watts; Yi-Bo Wang; Keith P Johnston; Robert O Williams
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Good Cascade Impactor Practice (GCIP) and considerations for "in-use" specifications.

Authors:  S C Nichols; J P Mitchell; C M Shelton; D L Roberts
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  The effect of nonideal cascade impactor stage collection efficiency curves on the interpretation of the size of inhaler-generated aerosols.

Authors:  D L Roberts; J P Mitchell
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  In vitro and in vivo performance of dry powder inhalation formulations: comparison of particles prepared by thin film freezing and micronization.

Authors:  Yi-Bo Wang; Alan B Watts; Jay I Peters; Sha Liu; Ayesha Batra; Robert O Williams
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Investigation of dry powder inhaler (DPI) resistance and aerosol dispersion timing on emitted aerosol aerodynamic particle sizing by multistage cascade impactor when sampled volume is reduced from compendial value of 4 L.

Authors:  Hlack Mohammed; Jan Arp; Frank Chambers; Mark Copley; Volker Glaab; Mark Hammond; Derek Solomon; Kerry Bradford; Theresa Russell; Yvonne Sizer; Steven C Nichols; Daryl L Roberts; Christopher Shelton; Roland Greguletz; Jolyon P Mitchell
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.246

10.  Aerodynamic particle size analysis of aerosols from pressurized metered-dose inhalers: comparison of Andersen 8-stage cascade impactor, next generation pharmaceutical impactor, and model 3321 Aerodynamic Particle Sizer aerosol spectrometer.

Authors:  Jolyon P Mitchell; Mark W Nagel; Kimberly J Wiersema; Cathy C Doyle
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 3.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.