Literature DB >> 24868078

Validation of ZAP-70 methylation and its relative significance in predicting outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Rainer Claus1, David M Lucas2, Amy S Ruppert2, Katie E Williams2, Daniel Weng3, Kara Patterson4, Manuela Zucknick5, Christopher C Oakes6, Laura Z Rassenti7, Andrew W Greaves7, Susan Geyer2, William G Wierda8, Jennifer R Brown9, John G Gribben10, Jacqueline C Barrientos11, Kanti R Rai11, Neil E Kay12, Thomas J Kipps7, Peter Shields3, Weiqiang Zhao4, Michael R Grever2, Christoph Plass6, John C Byrd2.   

Abstract

ZAP-70 methylation 223 nucleotides downstream of transcription start (CpG+223) predicts outcome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but its impact relative to CD38 and ZAP-70 expression or immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV) status is uncertain. Additionally, standardizing ZAP-70 expression analysis has been unsuccessful. CpG+223 methylation was quantitatively determined in 295 untreated CLL cases using MassARRAY. Impact on clinical outcome vs CD38 and ZAP-70 expression and IGHV status was evaluated. Cases with low methylation (<20%) had significantly shortened time to first treatment (TT) and overall survival (OS) (P < .0001). For TT, low methylation defined a large subset of ZAP-70 protein-negative cases with significantly shortened TT (median, 8.0 vs 3.9 years for high vs low methylation; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.74). Conversely, 16 ZAP-70 protein-positive cases with high methylation had poor outcome (median, 1.1 vs 2.3 years for high vs low methylation; HR = 1.62; 95% CI, 0.87-3.03). For OS, ZAP-70 methylation was the strongest risk factor; CD38 and ZAP-70 expression or IGHV status did not significantly improve OS prediction. A pyrosequencing assay was established that reproduced the MassARRAY data (κ coefficient > 0.90). Thus, ZAP-70 CpG+223 methylation represents a superior biomarker for TT and OS that can be feasibly measured, supporting its use in risk-stratifying CLL.
© 2014 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24868078      PMCID: PMC4125353          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-02-555722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  30 in total

1.  V(H) mutation status, CD38 expression level, genomic aberrations, and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Alexander Kröber; Till Seiler; Axel Benner; Lars Bullinger; Elsbeth Brückle; Peter Lichter; Hartmut Döhner; Stephan Stilgenbauer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  ZAP-70 compared with immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene mutation status as a predictor of disease progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Laura Z Rassenti; Lang Huynh; Tracy L Toy; Liguang Chen; Michael J Keating; John G Gribben; Donna S Neuberg; Ian W Flinn; Kanti R Rai; John C Byrd; Neil E Kay; Andrew Greaves; Arthur Weiss; Thomas J Kipps
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  CD38 expression is an important prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Authors:  J Dürig; M Naschar; U Schmücker; K Renzing-Köhler; T Hölter; A Hüttmann; U Dührsen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Chlorambucil in indolent chronic lymphocytic leukemia. French Cooperative Group on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  G Dighiero; K Maloum; B Desablens; B Cazin; M Navarro; R Leblay; M Leporrier; J Jaubert; G Lepeu; B Dreyfus; J L Binet; P Travade
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  ZAP-70 expression identifies a chronic lymphocytic leukemia subtype with unmutated immunoglobulin genes, inferior clinical outcome, and distinct gene expression profile.

Authors:  Adrian Wiestner; Andreas Rosenwald; Todd S Barry; George Wright; R Eric Davis; Sarah E Henrickson; Hong Zhao; Rachel E Ibbotson; Jenny A Orchard; Zadie Davis; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Mark Raffeld; Diane C Arthur; Gerald E Marti; Wyndham H Wilson; Terry J Hamblin; David G Oscier; Louis M Staudt
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  ZAP-70 expression as a surrogate for immunoglobulin-variable-region mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Marta Crespo; Francesc Bosch; Neus Villamor; Beatriz Bellosillo; Dolors Colomer; María Rozman; Silvia Marcé; Armando López-Guillermo; Elies Campo; Emili Montserrat
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  CD49d is the strongest flow cytometry-based predictor of overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Pietro Bulian; Tait D Shanafelt; Chris Fegan; Antonella Zucchetto; Lilla Cro; Holger Nückel; Luca Baldini; Antonina V Kurtova; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Jan A Burger; Gianluca Gaidano; Giovanni Del Poeta; Chris Pepper; Davide Rossi; Valter Gattei
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Expression of ZAP-70 is associated with increased B-cell receptor signaling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Liguang Chen; George Widhopf; Lang Huynh; Laura Rassenti; Kanti R Rai; Arthur Weiss; Thomas J Kipps
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  ZAP-70 expression is a prognostic factor in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  J Dürig; H Nückel; M Cremer; A Führer; K Halfmeyer; J Fandrey; T Möröy; L Klein-Hitpass; U Dührsen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  25 in total

1.  Cytogenetic prioritization with inclusion of molecular markers predicts outcome in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with fludarabine or fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide: a long-term follow-up study of the US intergroup phase III trial E2997.

Authors:  David M Lucas; Amy S Ruppert; Gerard Lozanski; Gordon W Dewald; Arletta Lozanski; Rainer Claus; Christoph Plass; Ian W Flinn; Donna S Neuberg; Elisabeth M Paietta; John M Bennett; Diane F Jelinek; John G Gribben; Mohamad A Hussein; Frederick R Appelbaum; Richard A Larson; Dennis F Moore; Martin S Tallman; John C Byrd; Michael R Grever
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-03-30

2.  TCL1 targeting miR-3676 is codeleted with tumor protein p53 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Veronica Balatti; Lara Rizzotto; Cecelia Miller; Alexey Palamarchuk; Paolo Fadda; Rosantony Pandolfo; Laura Z Rassenti; Erin Hertlein; Amy S Ruppert; Arletta Lozanski; Gerard Lozanski; Thomas J Kipps; John C Byrd; Carlo M Croce; Yuri Pekarsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Genomic and epigenomic heterogeneity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Romain Guièze; Catherine J Wu
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Molecular pathogenesis of CLL and its evolution.

Authors:  David Rodríguez; Gabriel Bretones; Javier R Arango; Víctor Valdespino; Elías Campo; Víctor Quesada; Carlos López-Otín
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Relevance of Prognostic Factors in the Era of Targeted Therapies in CLL.

Authors:  Adam S Kittai; Matthew Lunning; Alexey V Danilov
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  Developmental subtypes assessed by DNA methylation-iPLEX forecast the natural history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Brian Giacopelli; Qiuhong Zhao; Amy S Ruppert; Akwasi Agyeman; Christoph Weigel; Yue-Zhong Wu; Madelyn M Gerber; Kari G Rabe; Melissa C Larson; Junyan Lu; James S Blachly; Kerry A Rogers; William G Wierda; Jennifer R Brown; Kanti R Rai; Michael Keating; Laura Z Rassenti; Thomas J Kipps; Thorsten Zenz; Tait D Shanafelt; Neil E Kay; Lynne V Abruzzo; Kevin R Coombes; Jennifer A Woyach; John C Byrd; Christopher C Oakes
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Prognostic impact of epigenetic classification in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: The case of subset #2.

Authors:  Sujata Bhoi; Viktor Ljungström; Panagiotis Baliakas; Mattias Mattsson; Karin E Smedby; Gunnar Juliusson; Richard Rosenquist; Larry Mansouri
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.528

8.  DNA methylation dynamics during B cell maturation underlie a continuum of disease phenotypes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Christopher C Oakes; Marc Seifert; Yassen Assenov; Lei Gu; Martina Przekopowitz; Amy S Ruppert; Qi Wang; Charles D Imbusch; Andrius Serva; Sandra D Koser; David Brocks; Daniel B Lipka; Olga Bogatyrova; Dieter Weichenhan; Benedikt Brors; Laura Rassenti; Thomas J Kipps; Daniel Mertens; Marc Zapatka; Peter Lichter; Hartmut Döhner; Ralf Küppers; Thorsten Zenz; Stephan Stilgenbauer; John C Byrd; Christoph Plass
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Gene promoter methylation signature predicts survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Efterpi Kostareli; Thomas Hielscher; Manuela Zucknick; Lorena Baboci; Gunnar Wichmann; Dana Holzinger; Oliver Mücke; Michael Pawlita; Annarosa Del Mistro; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Maria Cristina Da Mosto; Giancarlo Tirelli; Peter Plinkert; Andreas Dietz; Christoph Plass; Dieter Weichenhan; Jochen Hess
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 10.  Prognostic Factors for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Christopher Chen; Soham Puvvada
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.