Literature DB >> 24867791

Vancomycin exposure in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: how much is enough?

Thomas P Lodise1, George L Drusano2, Evan Zasowski1, Amanda Dihmess1, Victoria Lazariu3, Leon Cosler1, Louise-Anne McNutt3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contemporary vancomycin dosing schemes are designed to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of ≥400. However, scant clinical data exist to support this target and available data relied on pharmacokinetic formulas based on daily vancomycin dose and estimated renal function (demographic pharmacokinetic model) to estimate AUCs.
METHODS: A cohort study of hospitalized, adult, nondialysis patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections treated with vancomycin was performed to quantitatively evaluate the relationship between vancomycin exposure and outcomes. Bayesian techniques were used to estimate vancomycin exposure profile for day 1 and 2 of therapy for each patient based on their dosing schedule and collected concentrations. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was used to identify day 1 and 2 exposure thresholds associated with an increased risk of failure. Failure was defined as 30-day mortality, bacteremia was ≥7 days, or recurrence.
RESULTS: During the study period, 123 cases met criteria. Failure was uniformly less pronounced (approximately 20% less in absolute value) in patients who achieved the CART-derived day 1 and 2 thresholds for AUC/MIC by broth microdilution and AUC/MIC by Etest. In the multivariate analyses, all risk ratios were approximately 0.5 for all CART-derived AUC/MIC exposure thresholds, indicating that achievement of CART-derived AUC/MIC exposure thresholds was associated with a 2-fold decrease in failure.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings establish the critical importance of daily AUC/MIC ratios during the first 2 days of therapy. As with all observational studies, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and validated in a multicenter randomized trial before adoption into practice.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; outcomes; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24867791     DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  44 in total

1.  Daptomycin Improves Outcomes Regardless of Vancomycin MIC in a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Kimberly C Claeys; Evan J Zasowski; Anthony M Casapao; Abdalhamid M Lagnf; Jerod L Nagel; Cynthia T Nguyen; Jessica A Hallesy; Mathew T Compton; Keith S Kaye; Donald P Levine; Susan L Davis; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Identification of Vancomycin Exposure-Toxicity Thresholds in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Intravenous Vancomycin.

Authors:  Evan J Zasowski; Kyle P Murray; Trang D Trinh; Natalie A Finch; Jason M Pogue; Ryan P Mynatt; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Should Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin Based on Area under the Curve Become Standard Practice for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Empiric antimicrobial therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: optimizing pathogen clearance.

Authors:  Stephen Y Liang; Anand Kumar
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Relationship between vancomycin exposure and outcomes among patients with MRSA bloodstream infections with vancomycin Etest® MIC values of 1.5mg/L: A pilot study.

Authors:  D M Martirosov; M R Bidell; M P Pai; M H Scheetz; S L Rosenkranz; T P Lodise
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Prospective Trial on the Use of Trough Concentration versus Area under the Curve To Determine Therapeutic Vancomycin Dosing.

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Lauren Kato; Gilmer Youn; Lironn Kraler; David Bayard; Michael van Guilder; Alan Schumitzky; Walter Yamada; Brenda Jones; Emi Minejima
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Association between vancomycin day 1 exposure profile and outcomes among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Anthony M Casapao; Thomas P Lodise; Susan L Davis; Kimberly C Claeys; Ravina Kullar; Donald P Levine; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in Children.

Authors:  Rana F Hamdy; Alice J Hsu; Chris Stockmann; Jared A Olson; Matthew Bryan; Adam L Hersh; Pranita D Tamma; Jeffrey S Gerber
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Vancomycin 24-Hour Area under the Curve/Minimum Bactericidal Concentration Ratio as a Novel Predictor of Mortality in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Nicholas S Britt; Nimish Patel; Rebecca T Horvat; Molly E Steed
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles of Anti-infective Dosing.

Authors:  Nikolas J Onufrak; Alan Forrest; Daniel Gonzalez
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.393

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.