Literature DB >> 28449844

Relationship between vancomycin exposure and outcomes among patients with MRSA bloodstream infections with vancomycin Etest® MIC values of 1.5mg/L: A pilot study.

D M Martirosov1, M R Bidell1, M P Pai1, M H Scheetz2, S L Rosenkranz3, T P Lodise4.   

Abstract

Data suggest that vancomycin is less effective for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) with vancomycin Etest® MIC (MICEtest) ≥1.5 mg/L. No published studies have evaluated the relationship between vancomycin exposure and outcomes among patients with MRSA BSIs vancomycin MICEtest ≥1.5 mg/L. This study was a retrospective cohort of 71 hospitalized, adult, non-dialysis patients with MRSA BSIs treated with vancomycin. All but three patients had a vancomycin MICEtest of 1.5 mg/L. Achievement of CART-derived AUC24-48h of at least 550 mg*h/L (AUC24-48h/MIC of 366 mg*h/L) was associated with a lower incidence of treatment failure. In multivariate analyses, the risk ratio was 0.45 for the CART-derived AUC24-48h threshold, indicating that achievement of the CART-derived AUC24-48h threshold of 550 was associated with a 2-fold decrease in treatment failure. These findings suggest a potential association between vancomycin exposure and outcomes in patients with MRSA BSIs with MICEtest ≥1.5 mg/L. As this study was retrospective, these findings provide the basis for a future large-scale, multi-center prospective study.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRSA; Pharmacokinetics; Vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28449844      PMCID: PMC5512425          DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  24 in total

1.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  The clinical significance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S J van Hal; T P Lodise; D L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Are vancomycin trough concentrations adequate for optimal dosing?

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Gilmer Youn; Brenda Jones; Roger W Jelliffe; George L Drusano; Keith A Rodvold; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Vancomycin therapeutic guidelines: a summary of consensus recommendations from the infectious diseases Society of America, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.

Authors:  Michael J Rybak; Ben M Lomaestro; John C Rotschafer; Robert C Moellering; Willam A Craig; Marianne Billeter; Joseph R Dalovisio; Donald P Levine
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Vancomycin AUC24/MIC ratio in patients with complicated bacteremia and infective endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its association with attributable mortality during hospitalization.

Authors:  Jack Brown; Kristen Brown; Alan Forrest
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration, host comorbidities and mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Authors:  N E Holmes; J D Turnidge; W J Munckhof; J O Robinson; T M Korman; M V N O'Sullivan; T L Anderson; S A Roberts; S J C Warren; W Gao; P D R Johnson; B P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  Relationship between vancomycin MIC and failure among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia treated with vancomycin.

Authors:  T P Lodise; J Graves; A Evans; E Graffunder; M Helmecke; B M Lomaestro; K Stellrecht
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Innovative approaches to optimizing the delivery of vancomycin in individual patients.

Authors:  Manjunath P Pai; Michael Neely; Keith A Rodvold; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 15.470

9.  The utility of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scores for prediction of mortality among intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Vanessa Stevens; Thomas P Lodise; Brian Tsuji; Meagan Stringham; Jill Butterfield; Elizabeth Dodds Ashley; Kristen Brown; Alan Forrest; Jack Brown
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.254

10.  High vancomycin MIC and complicated methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Jose Maria Aguado; Rafael San-Juan; Antonio Lalueza; Francisca Sanz; Joaquin Rodríguez-Otero; Carmen Gómez-Gonzalez; Fernando Chaves
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Continued Value of Disk Diffusion for Assessing Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Clinical Laboratories: Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Susan Kircher; Andrea Ferrell; Kevin M Krause; Rianna Malherbe; Andre Hsiung; C A Burnham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Point-Counterpoint: Should Clinical Microbiology Laboratories Report Vancomycin MICs?

Authors:  Sara L Revolinski; Christopher D Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  [Therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic models as a strategy for rational antibiotic therapy in intensive care patients].

Authors:  Lea Marie Schatz; Michael Zoller; Christina Scharf; Uwe Liebchen
Journal:  Anaesthesiologie       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 4.  Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper.

Authors:  Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Matteo Bassetti; Hendrik Bracht; George Dimopoulos; Deborah Marriott; Michael N Neely; Jose-Artur Paiva; Federico Pea; Fredrik Sjovall; Jean F Timsit; Andrew A Udy; Sebastian G Wicha; Markus Zeitlinger; Jan J De Waele; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Diagnostic and medical needs for therapeutic drug monitoring of antibiotics.

Authors:  Claude Mabilat; Marie Francoise Gros; David Nicolau; Johan W Mouton; Julien Textoris; Jason A Roberts; Menino O Cotta; Alex van Belkum; Isabelle Caniaux
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Optimizing Antimicrobial Drug Dosing in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Pedro Póvoa; Patrícia Moniz; João Gonçalves Pereira; Luís Coelho
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.