Literature DB >> 24867548

Toward a trustworthy voice: increasing the effectiveness of automated outreach calls to promote colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.

Karen Albright1, Terri Richardson2, Karin L Kempe3, Kristin Wallace4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer screening rates are lower among African-American members of Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) than among members of other races and ethnicities. This study evaluated use of a linguistically congruent voice in interactive voice response outreach calls about colorectal cancer screening as a strategy to increase call completion and response.
METHODS: After an initial discussion group to assess cultural acceptability of the project, 6 focus groups were conducted with 33 KPCO African-American members. Participants heard and discussed recordings of 5 female voices reading the same segment of the standard-practice colorectal cancer message using interactive voice response. The linguistic palette included the voices of a white woman, a lightly accented Latina, and 3 African-American women.
RESULTS: Participants strongly preferred the African-American voices, particularly two voices. Participants considered these voices the most trustworthy and reported that they would be the most effective at increasing motivation to complete an automated call. Participants supported the use of African-American voices when designing outgoing automated calls for African Americans because the sense of familiarity engendered trust among listeners. Participants also indicated that effective automated messages should provide immediate clarity of purpose; explain why the issue is relevant to African Americans; avoid sounding scripted; emphasize that the call is for the listener's benefit only; sound personable, warm, and positive; and not create fear among listeners. DISCUSSION: Establishing linguistic congruence between African Americans and the voices used in automated calls designed to reach them may increase the effectiveness of outreach efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24867548      PMCID: PMC4022555          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/13-139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  14 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.

Authors:  U H Graneheim; B Lundman
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Racial/ethnic patterns of uptake of colorectal screening, National Health Interview Survey 2000-2008.

Authors:  Vickie L Shavers; Monica C Jackson; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Automated telephone calls improved completion of fecal occult blood testing.

Authors:  David M Mosen; Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; David H Smith; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Myers; Michael Kositch; Thomas Hickey; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

5.  Race and colorectal cancer disparities: health-care utilization vs different cancer susceptibilities.

Authors:  Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Chyke Doubeni; Paul F Pinsky; V Paul Doria-Rose; Robert Bresalier; Lois E Lamerato; E David Crawford; Paul Kvale; Mona Fouad; Thomas Hickey; Thomas Riley; Joel Weissfeld; Robert E Schoen; Pamela M Marcus; Philip C Prorok; Christine D Berg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Social and cultural factors are related to perceived colorectal cancer screening benefits and intentions in African Americans.

Authors:  Jason Q Purnell; Mira L Katz; Barbara L Andersen; Oxana Palesh; Colmar Figueroa-Moseley; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Nancy Bennett
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-10-30

7.  Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years - United States, 2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Mailed fecal-immunochemical test for colon cancer screening.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Barcey T Levy; Mary L Merchant; Jason Wilbur
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-06

9.  Colorectal cancer in African Americans.

Authors:  Sangeeta Agrawal; Anand Bhupinderjit; Manoop S Bhutani; Lisa Boardman; Cuong Nguyen; Yvonne Romero; Radhika Srinivasan; Radhika Srinvasan; Colmar Figueroa-Moseley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Automated phone and mail population outreach to promote colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Karin L Kempe; Susan M Shetterly; Eric K France; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  3 in total

1.  Black Americans' Perspectives of Barriers and Facilitators of Community Screening for Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Ebele M Umeukeje; Marcus G Wild; Saugar Maripuri; Teresa Davidson; Margaret Rutherford; Khaled Abdel-Kader; Julia Lewis; Consuelo H Wilkins; Kerri Cavanaugh
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Automated Outreach for Cardiovascular-Related Medication Refill Reminders.

Authors:  Teresa N Harrison; Kelley R Green; In-Lu Amy Liu; Southida S Vansomphone; Joel Handler; Ronald D Scott; T Craig Cheetham; Kristi Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Effectiveness of automated and live phone reminders after mailed-FIT outreach in a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Carrie M Nielson; Jennifer S Rivelli; Morgan J Fuoco; Victoria R Gawlik; Ricardo Jimenez; Amanda F Petrik; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-10-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.