PURPOSE: Recent policy changes in the USA have led to an increasing number of patients being placed into observation units rather than admitted directly to the hospital. Studies of administrative data that use inpatient diagnosis codes to identify cohorts, outcomes, or covariates may be affected by this change in practice. To understand the potential impact of observation stays on research using administrative healthcare data, we examine the trends of observation stays, short (≤2 days) inpatient admissions, and all inpatient admissions. METHODS: We examined a large administrative claims database of commercially insured individuals in the USA between 2002 and 2011. Observation stays were defined on the basis of the procedure codes reimbursable by Medicare or commercial insurers. We report monthly rates of observation stays and short inpatient admissions overall and by patient demographics. RESULTS: We identified 5 355 752 observation stays from 2002 to 2011. Over the course of study, the rate of observation stays increased, whereas the rate of short inpatient stays declined. The most common reason for observation stays was nonspecific chest pain, also the third most common reason for short inpatient stays. The increasing trend of observation stays related to circulatory diseases mirrors the decreasing trend of short inpatient stays. CONCLUSIONS: The use of observation stays has increased in patients with commercial insurance. Failure to account for observation stays may lead to an under-ascertainment of hospitalizations in contemporary administrative healthcare data from the USA.
PURPOSE: Recent policy changes in the USA have led to an increasing number of patients being placed into observation units rather than admitted directly to the hospital. Studies of administrative data that use inpatient diagnosis codes to identify cohorts, outcomes, or covariates may be affected by this change in practice. To understand the potential impact of observation stays on research using administrative healthcare data, we examine the trends of observation stays, short (≤2 days) inpatient admissions, and all inpatient admissions. METHODS: We examined a large administrative claims database of commercially insured individuals in the USA between 2002 and 2011. Observation stays were defined on the basis of the procedure codes reimbursable by Medicare or commercial insurers. We report monthly rates of observation stays and short inpatient admissions overall and by patient demographics. RESULTS: We identified 5 355 752 observation stays from 2002 to 2011. Over the course of study, the rate of observation stays increased, whereas the rate of short inpatient stays declined. The most common reason for observation stays was nonspecific chest pain, also the third most common reason for short inpatient stays. The increasing trend of observation stays related to circulatory diseases mirrors the decreasing trend of short inpatient stays. CONCLUSIONS: The use of observation stays has increased in patients with commercial insurance. Failure to account for observation stays may lead to an under-ascertainment of hospitalizations in contemporary administrative healthcare data from the USA.
Authors: Ann M Sheehy; Ben K Graf; Sreedevi Gangireddy; Roger Formisano; Elizabeth A Jacobs Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Ann M Sheehy; Ben Graf; Sreedevi Gangireddy; Robert Hoffman; Mary Ehlenbach; Cynthia Heidke; Sheilah Fields; Barbara Liegel; Elizabeth A Jacobs Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Julie C Lauffenburger; Akhila Balasubramanian; Joel F Farley; Cathy W Critchlow; Cynthia D O'Malley; Mary T Roth; Virginia Pate; M Alan Brookhart Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Arjun K Venkatesh; Benjamin P Geisler; Jennifer J Gibson Chambers; Christopher W Baugh; J Stephen Bohan; Jeremiah D Schuur Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kevin G Volpp; Andrea B Troxel; Shivan J Mehta; Laurie Norton; Jingsan Zhu; Raymond Lim; Wenli Wang; Noora Marcus; Christian Terwiesch; Kristen Caldarella; Tova Levin; Mike Relish; Nathan Negin; Aaron Smith-McLallen; Richard Snyder; Claire M Spettell; Brian Drachman; Daniel Kolansky; David A Asch Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Robert A Overman; Joel F Farley; Jeffrey R Curtis; Jie Zhang; Margaret L Gourlay; Chad L Deal Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Elaine Nguyen; Craig I Coleman; W Frank Peacock; Philip S Wells; Erin R Weeda; Veronica Ashton; Concetta Crivera; Peter Wildgoose; Jeff R Schein; Thomas J Bunz; Gregory J Fermann Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Stephanie T Lumpkin; Paula D Strassle; Jason P Fine; Timothy S Carey; Karyn B Stitzenberg Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.412