Kevin G Volpp1,2,3,4,5,6, Andrea B Troxel6,7, Shivan J Mehta2,3,5,6, Laurie Norton1,6, Jingsan Zhu1,6, Raymond Lim1,2,6, Wenli Wang8, Noora Marcus1,6, Christian Terwiesch9, Kristen Caldarella1,6, Tova Levin10, Mike Relish10, Nathan Negin11, Aaron Smith-McLallen12, Richard Snyder12, Claire M Spettell13, Brian Drachman5, Daniel Kolansky5, David A Asch1,2,3,4,5,6. 1. Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia. 2. Penn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia. 3. Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Health Care Management, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia. 6. LDI Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 7. Division of Biostatistics, New York University, New York. 8. University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia. 9. Operations and Information Management, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 10. Humana, Louisville, Kentucky. 11. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield, Newark, New Jersey. 12. Independence Blue Shield, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 13. Aetna, Hartford, Connecticut.
Abstract
Importance: Adherence to medications prescribed after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is low. Wireless technology and behavioral economic approaches have shown promise in improving health behaviors. Objective: To determine whether a system of medication reminders using financial incentives and social support delays subsequent vascular events in patients following AMI compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two-arm, randomized clinical trial with a 12-month intervention conducted from 2013 through 2016. Investigators were blinded to study group, but participants were not. Design was a health plan-intermediated intervention for members of several health plans. We recruited 1509 participants from 7179 contacted AMI survivors (insured with 5 large US insurers nationally or with Medicare fee-for-service at the University of Pennsylvania Health System). Patients aged 18 to 80 years were eligible if currently prescribed at least 2 of 4 study medications (statin, aspirin, β-blocker, antiplatelet agent), and were hospital inpatients for 1 to 180 days and discharged home with a principal diagnosis of AMI. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to an intervention using electronic pill bottles combined with lottery incentives and social support for medication adherence (1003 patients), or to usual care (506 patients). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was time to first vascular rehospitalization or death. Secondary outcomes were time to first all-cause rehospitalization, total number of repeated hospitalizations, medication adherence, and total medical costs. Results:A total of 35.5% of participants were female (n = 536); mean (SD) age was 61.0 (10.3) years. There were no statistically significant differences between study arms in time to first rehospitalization for a vascular event or death (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.52; P = .84), time to first all-cause rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.09; P = .27), or total number of repeated hospitalizations (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.48; P = .79). Mean (SD) medication adherence did not differ between control (0.42 [0.39]) and intervention (0.46 [0.39]) (difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.09; P = .10). Mean (SD) medical costs in 12 months following enrollment did not differ between control ($29 811 [$74 850]) and intervention ($24 038 [$66 915]) (difference, -$5773; 95% CI, -$13 682 to $2137; P = .15). Conclusions and Relevance: A compound intervention integrating wireless pill bottles, lottery-based incentives, and social support did not significantly improve medication adherence or vascular readmission outcomes for AMI survivors. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01800201.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Adherence to medications prescribed after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is low. Wireless technology and behavioral economic approaches have shown promise in improving health behaviors. Objective: To determine whether a system of medication reminders using financial incentives and social support delays subsequent vascular events in patients following AMI compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two-arm, randomized clinical trial with a 12-month intervention conducted from 2013 through 2016. Investigators were blinded to study group, but participants were not. Design was a health plan-intermediated intervention for members of several health plans. We recruited 1509 participants from 7179 contacted AMI survivors (insured with 5 large US insurers nationally or with Medicare fee-for-service at the University of Pennsylvania Health System). Patients aged 18 to 80 years were eligible if currently prescribed at least 2 of 4 study medications (statin, aspirin, β-blocker, antiplatelet agent), and were hospital inpatients for 1 to 180 days and discharged home with a principal diagnosis of AMI. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to an intervention using electronic pill bottles combined with lottery incentives and social support for medication adherence (1003 patients), or to usual care (506 patients). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was time to first vascular rehospitalization or death. Secondary outcomes were time to first all-cause rehospitalization, total number of repeated hospitalizations, medication adherence, and total medical costs. Results: A total of 35.5% of participants were female (n = 536); mean (SD) age was 61.0 (10.3) years. There were no statistically significant differences between study arms in time to first rehospitalization for a vascular event or death (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.52; P = .84), time to first all-cause rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.09; P = .27), or total number of repeated hospitalizations (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.48; P = .79). Mean (SD) medication adherence did not differ between control (0.42 [0.39]) and intervention (0.46 [0.39]) (difference, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.09; P = .10). Mean (SD) medical costs in 12 months following enrollment did not differ between control ($29 811 [$74 850]) and intervention ($24 038 [$66 915]) (difference, -$5773; 95% CI, -$13 682 to $2137; P = .15). Conclusions and Relevance: A compound intervention integrating wireless pill bottles, lottery-based incentives, and social support did not significantly improve medication adherence or vascular readmission outcomes for AMI survivors. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01800201.
Authors: Hayden B Bosworth; Bradi B Granger; Phil Mendys; Ralph Brindis; Rebecca Burkholder; Susan M Czajkowski; Jodi G Daniel; Inger Ekman; Michael Ho; Mimi Johnson; Stephen E Kimmel; Larry Z Liu; John Musaus; William H Shrank; Elizabeth Whalley Buono; Karen Weiss; Christopher B Granger Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Niteesh K Choudhry; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Joy L Lee; Troyen A Brennan; Lonny Reisman; Michele Toscano; Raisa Levin; Olga S Matlin; Elliott M Antman; William H Shrank Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Niteesh K Choudhry; Jerry Avorn; Robert J Glynn; Elliott M Antman; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Michele Toscano; Lonny Reisman; Joaquim Fernandes; Claire Spettell; Joy L Lee; Raisa Levin; Troyen Brennan; William H Shrank Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter P Reese; Roy D Bloom; Jennifer Trofe-Clark; Adam Mussell; Daniel Leidy; Simona Levsky; Jingsan Zhu; Lin Yang; Wenli Wang; Andrea Troxel; Harold I Feldman; Kevin Volpp Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: David A Asch; Andrea B Troxel; Walter F Stewart; Thomas D Sequist; James B Jones; AnneMarie G Hirsch; Karen Hoffer; Jingsan Zhu; Wenli Wang; Amanda Hodlofski; Antonette B Frasch; Mark G Weiner; Darra D Finnerty; Meredith B Rosenthal; Kelsey Gangemi; Kevin G Volpp Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrea B Troxel; David A Asch; Shivan J Mehta; Laurie Norton; Devon Taylor; Tirza A Calderon; Raymond Lim; Jingsan Zhu; Daniel M Kolansky; Brian M Drachman; Kevin G Volpp Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 5.099
Authors: Kevin G Volpp; George Loewenstein; Andrea B Troxel; Jalpa Doshi; Maureen Price; Mitchell Laskin; Stephen E Kimmel Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Shivan J Mehta; Kevin G Volpp; David A Asch; Lee R Goldberg; Louise B Russell; Laurie A Norton; Lauren G Iannotte; Andrea B Troxel Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2019-04
Authors: Janice B Schwartz; Kenneth E Schmader; Joseph T Hanlon; Darrell R Abernethy; Shelly Gray; Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob; Holly M Holmes; Michael D Murray; Robert Roberts; Michael Joyner; Josh Peterson; David Lindeman; Ming Tai-Seale; Laura Downey; Michael W Rich Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Talea Cornelius; Corrine I Voils; Jeffrey L Birk; Emily K Romero; Donald E Edmondson; Ian M Kronish Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: William E Yang; Lochan M Shah; Erin M Spaulding; Jane Wang; Helen Xun; Daniel Weng; Rongzi Shan; Shannon Wongvibulsin; Francoise A Marvel; Seth S Martin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.497