Literature DB >> 23835927

Hospitalized but not admitted: characteristics of patients with "observation status" at an academic medical center.

Ann M Sheehy1, Ben Graf, Sreedevi Gangireddy, Robert Hoffman, Mary Ehlenbach, Cynthia Heidke, Sheilah Fields, Barbara Liegel, Elizabeth A Jacobs.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) defines observation status for hospitalized patients as a "well-defined set of specific, clinically appropriate services," usually lasting less than 24 hours, and that in "only rare and exceptional cases" should last more than 48 hours. Although an increasing proportion of observation care occurs on hospital wards, studies of patients with observation status have focused on the efficiency of dedicated units.
OBJECTIVE: To describe inpatient and observation care. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Descriptive study of all inpatient and observation stays between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011, at the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, a 566-bed tertiary academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with observation or inpatient stays during the study period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient demographics, length of stay, difference between cost and reimbursement per stay, and percentage of patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities.
RESULTS: Of 43,853 stays, 4578 (10.4%) were for observation, with 1141 distinct diagnosis codes. Mean observation length of stay was 33.3 hours, with 44.4% of stay durations less than 24 hours and 16.5% more than 48 hours. Observation care had a negative margin per stay (-$331); the inpatient margin per stay was positive (+$2163). Adult general medicine patients accounted for 2404 (52.5%) of all observation stays; 25.4% of the 9453 adult general medicine stays were for observation. The mean length of stay for general medicine observation patients was 41.1 hours, with 32.6% of stay durations less than 24 hours and 26.4% more than 48 hours. Compared with observation patients on other clinical services, adult general medicine had the highest percentage of patients older than 65 years (40.9%), highest percentage female patients (57.9%), highest percentage of patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (11.6%), and the most negative margin per stay (-$1378). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In an academic medical center, observation status for hospitalized patients differed markedly from the CMS definition. Patients had a wide variety of diagnoses; lengths of stay were typically more than 24 hours and often more than 48 hours. The hospital lost money, primarily because reimbursement for general medicine patients was inadequate to cover the costs. It is uncertain what role, if any, observation status for hospitalized patients should have in the era of health care reform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23835927      PMCID: PMC3942156          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  5 in total

1.  Sharp rise in Medicare enrollees being held in hospitals for observation raises concerns about causes and consequences.

Authors:  Zhanlian Feng; Brad Wright; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The birth of InterQual: evidence-based decision support criteria that helped change healthcare.

Authors:  A Jacqueline Mitus
Journal:  Prof Case Manag       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Making greater use of dedicated hospital observation units for many short-stay patients could save $3.1 billion a year.

Authors:  Christopher W Baugh; Arjun K Venkatesh; Joshua A Hilton; Peter A Samuel; Jeremiah D Schuur; J Stephen Bohan
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Reducing unnecessary medicare admissions: a six-state project.

Authors:  Andrea Romero; Carlene Brown; Ferdinand Richards; Patricia Collier; Susan Jentz; Mark Michelman; Karen Davison
Journal:  Prof Case Manag       Date:  2009 May-Jun

5.  Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and Fiscal Year 2014 rates; quality reporting requirements for specific providers; hospital conditions of participation; payment policies related to patient status. Final rules.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2013-08-19
  5 in total
  25 in total

1.  The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) two midnight rule: policy at odds with reality.

Authors:  Ciara R Huntington; Laurel J Blair; Tiffany C Cox; Tanushree Prasad; Kent W Kercher; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of Hospital Resource Use and Outcomes Among Hospitalists, Primary Care Physicians, and Other Generalists.

Authors:  Jennifer P Stevens; David J Nyweide; Sha Maresh; Laura A Hatfield; Michael D Howell; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Impact of observation status on hospital use for patients with cancer.

Authors:  Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Adam Klotz; Coral L Atoria; Steven Martin; Jeffrey Groeger
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  What Is an Observation Stay? Evaluating the Use of Hospital Observation Stays in Medicare.

Authors:  W Ryan Powell; Farah A Kaiksow; Amy J H Kind; Ann M Sheehy
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Observation stays in administrative claims databases: underestimation of hospitalized cases.

Authors:  Robert A Overman; Janet K Freburger; Magdalene M Assimon; Xiaojuan Li; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  One-year outcomes associated with using observation services in triaging patients with nonspecific chest pain.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Abbass; Salim S Virani; J Michael Swint; Wenyaw Chan; Luisa Franzini
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 7.  Early management of patients with acute heart failure: state of the art and future directions. A consensus document from the society for academic emergency medicine/heart failure society of America acute heart failure working group.

Authors:  Sean Collins; Alan B Storrow; Nancy M Albert; Javed Butler; Justin Ezekowitz; G Michael Felker; Gregory J Fermann; Gregg C Fonarow; Michael M Givertz; Brian Hiestand; Judd E Hollander; David E Lanfear; Phillip D Levy; Peter S Pang; W Frank Peacock; Douglas B Sawyer; John R Teerlink; Daniel J Lenihan
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 8.  Early management of patients with acute heart failure: state of the art and future directions--a consensus document from the SAEM/HFSA acute heart failure working group.

Authors:  Sean P Collins; Alan B Storrow; Phillip D Levy; Nancy Albert; Javed Butler; Justin A Ezekowitz; G Michael Felker; Gregory J Fermann; Gregg C Fonarow; Michael M Givertz; Brian Hiestand; Judd E Hollander; David E Lanfear; Peter S Pang; W Frank Peacock; Douglas B Sawyer; John R Teerlink; Daniel J Lenihan
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  An electronic health record-based intervention to increase follow-up office visits and decrease rehospitalization in older adults.

Authors:  Jerry H Gurwitz; Terry S Field; Jessica Ogarek; Jennifer Tjia; Sarah L Cutrona; Leslie R Harrold; Shawn J Gagne; Peggy Preusse; Jennifer L Donovan; Abir O Kanaan; George Reed; Lawrence Garber
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.562

10.  The origin and disposition of Medicare observation stays.

Authors:  Zhanlian Feng; Hye-Young Jung; Brad Wright; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.