Hydrogenases are oxygen-sensitive enzymes that catalyze the conversion between protons and hydrogen. Water-soluble subcomplexes of membrane-bound [NiFe]-hydrogenases (MBH) have been extensively studied for applications in hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells as they are relatively tolerant to oxygen, although even these catalysts are still inactivated in oxidative conditions. Here, the full heterotrimeric MBH of Ralstonia eutropha, including the membrane-integral cytochrome b subunit, was investigated electrochemically using electrodes modified with planar tethered bilayer lipid membranes (tBLM). Cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry experiments show that MBH, in equilibrium with the quinone pool in the tBLM, does not anaerobically inactivate under oxidative redox conditions. In aerobic environments, the MBH is reversibly inactivated by O2, but reactivation was found to be fast even under oxidative redox conditions. This enhanced resistance to inactivation is ascribed to the oligomeric state of MBH in the lipid membrane.
Hydrogenases are oxygen-sensitive enzymes that catalyze the conversion between protons and hydrogen. Water-soluble subcomplexes of membrane-bound [NiFe]-hydrogenases (MBH) have been extensively studied for applications in hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells as they are relatively tolerant to oxygen, although even these catalysts are still inactivated in oxidative conditions. Here, the full heterotrimeric MBH of Ralstonia eutropha, including the membrane-integral cytochrome b subunit, was investigated electrochemically using electrodes modified with planar tethered bilayer lipid membranes (tBLM). Cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry experiments show that MBH, in equilibrium with the quinone pool in the tBLM, does not anaerobically inactivate under oxidative redox conditions. In aerobic environments, the MBH is reversibly inactivated by O2, but reactivation was found to be fast even under oxidative redox conditions. This enhanced resistance to inactivation is ascribed to the oligomeric state of MBH in the lipid membrane.
Hydrogenases are complex microbial
metalloenzymes which catalyze the reversible oxidation of H2 to protons at rates comparable to those normally achieved by Pt.[1] They are widespread in the microbial world where
they are used to dispose of excess reducing power (H2 production)
or to produce energy (H2 oxidation).[2] Their ability to selectively interconvert H2 to H+s makes them ideal catalysts for H2/O2 biofuel cells. When they are used in conjunction with a selective
catalyst for O2 reduction, like laccase or bilirubin oxidase,
it is no longer necessary to separate the anode from the cathode with
a gas impermeable membrane as required in Pt-based fuel cells.[3] Hydrogenases have thus been intensively studied
both as an inspiration to design inorganic catalysts and as biocatalysts
themselves.[4] Based on the metal content
of the active site, H+-H2 interconverting hydrogenases
have been classified into [NiFe]- and [FeFe]-hydrogenases. [FeFe]-hydrogenases
have high turnover frequencies for H2 production, but they
are inactivated by trace amounts of O2.[5] [NiFe]-hydrogenases, by contrast, are generally less sensitive
to O2 inactivation and biased toward H2 oxidation.[6][NiFe]-hydrogenases have been further subdivided
into “standard”
(O2-sensitive) and O2-tolerant hydrogenases,
and many studies have focused on the elucidation of the origins of
the O2 tolerance.[7] The membrane-bound
hydrogenase (MBH) from the β-proteobacterium Ralstonia eutropha is one of the best studied O2-tolerant [NiFe]-hydrogenases.[8] It is an uptake hydrogenase that links H2 oxidation to
quinone reduction and has an outstanding O2 tolerance,
capable of maintaining a high level of activity in the presence of
air supplemented with low H2 concentrations.[6b,9] As many other uptake [NiFe]-hydrogenases, it consists of three subunits,
one of which is an integral membrane protein (Figure 1). The [NiFe] active center is located in the large subunit
(α), and three [FeS] clusters are aligned in the small subunit
(β) forming an electron relay.[10] The
third subunit is a diheme cytochrome b562, which anchors the protein complex to the cytoplasmic membrane and
transfers electrons from H2 oxidation to the respiratory
chain via the quinone pool.[11] Both ubiquinone
and menaquinone have been proposed to be the native substrate.[8b]
Figure 1
Heterotrimeric MBH is incorporated in the tBLM adsorbed
on a mixed
self-assembled monolayer made of EO3-cholesteryl (tether) and 6-mercaptohexan-1-ol
(spacer) on the surface of a gold electrode. The main reactions catalyzed
by the enzyme are shown in red. The ubiquinone (UQ) added to the tBLM
is reduced by the cytchrome b562 to ubiquinol
(UQH2) which is reoxidized at the electrode. The oxidative
conversion of the [NiFe] site from the Ni–S state to the inactive
Ni–B state is depicted at the top.
Heterotrimeric MBH is incorporated in the tBLM adsorbed
on a mixed
self-assembled monolayer made of EO3-cholesteryl (tether) and 6-mercaptohexan-1-ol
(spacer) on the surface of a gold electrode. The main reactions catalyzed
by the enzyme are shown in red. The ubiquinone (UQ) added to the tBLM
is reduced by the cytchrome b562 to ubiquinol
(UQH2) which is reoxidized at the electrode. The oxidative
conversion of the [NiFe] site from the Ni–S state to the inactive
Ni–B state is depicted at the top.CVs showing the influence of (a) pH, (b) temperature, or (c, d)
quinone pool on enzyme activity in anaerobic conditions. H2 concentrations as indicated. All experiments were performed at 10
mV/s, pH 7.4, 30 °C unless stated otherwise. Inset of (c) was
measured at 1 mV/s. The arrows in (c) indicate the direction of scan.
The CVs in (b) were measured with less MBH in the tBLM compared to
(a, c, and d) (see the Experimental Section in SI). (a–c) were measured using 1% (w/w) ubiquinone-10
to lipid ratio in the membrane and (d) was measured with 2% (w/w)
menaquinone-7. Abbreviations: SHE, standard hydrogen electrode; Re, Ralstonia eutropha.The O2 tolerance of
the MBH and of closely related enzymes
has been attributed to the “special” design of the unusual
proximal [4Fe-3S] cluster, which has the ability to provide two electrons
in a narrow potential range, helping to keep a reducing environment
when the MBH reacts with oxygen.[2b,7c,7f,10,12] When O2 reacts at the active site, this cluster ensures
the formation of the so-called Ni–B state (Figure 1), also designated as a “ready inactive”
state, which is rapidly reactivated (in a matter of seconds) under
a H2 atmosphere. In contrast, O2-sensitive [NiFe]-hydrogenases,
which have a conventional [4Fe-4S] cluster at the proximal site, form
in addition to Ni–B the inactive Ni–A state upon reacting
with O2, which usually requires nonphysiological negative
potentials to reactivate.[9b,13] In addition to crystallography
and spectroscopy, protein film electrochemistry (PFE) has been invaluable
in elucidating the inactivation–reactivation mechanism.[4e,7g,14] PFE provides a direct way for
monitoring catalytic turnover by adsorbing the protein on the surface
of an electrode (typically a graphite electrode) and controlling the
enzymatic activity via the electrode potential. PFE studies have shown
that [NiFe]-hydrogenases are inactivated at high potentials in anaerobic
conditions and that inactivation is faster at low H2 concentrations
(in the low μM range).[5,6a,6c,7a,13b] The H2 oxidation activity drops as the potential is raised,
and it recovers when the active site is reduced at low potentials.
The inactive state formed at high redox potentials was determined
to be the Ni–B state.[6c,13b] This anaerobic inactivation
mechanism has also been observed with nonphysiological oxidants.[16] Almost all PFE studies on MBH have employed
the hydrophilic αβ subcomplex.[5,6a,6b,7g,9a,9b,14e] Here, we describe a different approach, in which the full heterotrimeric
MBH is immobilized at an electrode interface using a so-called tethered
bilayer lipid membrane (tBLM) (Figure 1).[20] Cytoplasmic membrane extracts from R. eutropha, containing MBH, are tethered to an electrode
surface using cholesterol-based anchor molecules. The full heterotrimeric
structure is retained as the MBH remains in a native-like membrane
environment. By incorporating ubiquinone in the tBLM, the native catalytic
function of the MBH, namely H2-ubiquinone oxidoreduction,
can be studied, where the redox state of the quinone pool is controlled
by the potential applied to the electrode (Figure 1). We show that the full heterotrimeric MBH in a lipid environment
does not display anaerobic (oxidative) inactivation, as the hydrophilic
subcomplexes do, and that O2-inactivated MBH rapidly reactivates
under oxidative conditions even when the quinone pool is fully oxidized.Experiments examining the influence of pH and temperature on enzyme
activity were carried out to determine the optimum conditions for
monitoring the catalytic activity (Figure 2). The optimum pH value for H2 oxidation activity seems
to lie in the range of 7 to 8, unlike the heterodimeric αβ
subcomplex for which an optimum between 4.5 and 6.5 was determined
(Figure 2a).[5,6a,9a] A similar difference in pH optimum was reported in
a study employing spectrophotometric assays.[21] However, we note that at lower pH, the oxidation wave shifts to
higher potentials, preventing us to reach potentials at which MBH
is fully active as the tBLM system is damaged by potentials higher
than 0.6 V. The shift in potential is a consequence of the pH dependence
of the ubiquinol oxidation potential. We also propose that the absence
of clear current plateaus at high potential (Figure 2) is due to the particular kinetic properties of the electrochemical
oxidation of ubiquinol, which is coupled or “gated”
by slow proton release in the lipid bilayer.[22] Above pH 8 the enzymatic activity sharply drops, and no recovery
is observed when the pH is subsequently lowered, suggesting denaturation
of MBH at high pH. The MBH in the tBLM is stable at temperatures up
to 50 °C, although some loss of activity is observed on time-scales
in the order of hours at temperatures above 30 °C (Figure 2b). Consequently all the following experiments were
performed at 30 °C and pH 7.4. Control experiments were carried
out by recording cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of tBLMs prepared from
cytoplasmic membranes lacking the αβ subcomplex of the
MBH, which showed no H2 oxidation activity.
Figure 2
CVs showing the influence of (a) pH, (b) temperature, or (c, d)
quinone pool on enzyme activity in anaerobic conditions. H2 concentrations as indicated. All experiments were performed at 10
mV/s, pH 7.4, 30 °C unless stated otherwise. Inset of (c) was
measured at 1 mV/s. The arrows in (c) indicate the direction of scan.
The CVs in (b) were measured with less MBH in the tBLM compared to
(a, c, and d) (see the Experimental Section in SI). (a–c) were measured using 1% (w/w) ubiquinone-10
to lipid ratio in the membrane and (d) was measured with 2% (w/w)
menaquinone-7. Abbreviations: SHE, standard hydrogen electrode; Re, Ralstonia eutropha.
CVs recorded
under 100% N2 (Figure 2, gray lines)
show no catalytic oxidation waves, instead uncovering
the oxidation and reduction signals of the ubiquinone pool in the
tBLM. The large peak separation of the ubiquinone electrochemistry
has previously been studied in detail and is caused by the coupling
of the electron transfer with protonation/deprotonation steps, which
are slow due to the lipid bilayer environment.[22] The onset of H2 oxidation (black line) coincides
with ubiquinol oxidation (Figure 2c), confirming
the fact that the electron transfer between the MBH and the electrode
takes place via the quinone pool. A clear feature in all the catalytic
oxidation waves in Figure 2 is the absence
of any anaerobic inactivation at high potential. Previous studies
have shown that the anaerobic inactivation of the heterodimeric αβ
subcomplex of MBH is more pronounced at low substrate concentrations
and slow scan rates.[6a,14e] Therefore, CVs were recorded
at 1 mV/s under 0.5% (4.0 μM) and 0.1% (0.8 μM) H2 (insert in Figure 2c and Figure S1). In either condition, no decrease
in current is observed as the potential is swept toward positive values,
which confirms that the heterotrimeric MBH in equilibrium with the
quinone pool displays little or no anaerobic inactivation even in
substrate limiting conditions.To confirm that also menaquinone
can act as electron acceptor of
MBH, as previously proposed,[8b] experiments
were performed with added menaquinone (Figure 2d, see SI for details). Menaquinone is
oxidized at a lower potential than ubiquinone, and consequently the
onset of hydrogen oxidation is visible from about −0.1 V onward,
about 0.3 V lower. The reduction potential of menaquinone is only
∼0.2 V lower than ubiquinone. However, as already mentioned,
the quinone oxidation in tBLMs is coupled to the deprotonation of
the quinol.[22] Apparently, differences between
deprotonation rates and/or pKas between
menaquinone and ubiquinone cause an additional 0.1 V shift.In Figure 2d, a slight shoulder around 0.3
V is visible, which is due to trace amounts of ubiquinone-8 present
in the tBLM. This ubiquinone originates from the Escherichia
coli lipid extract as well as the cytoplasmic membrane
extracts from R. eutropha that were
used to prepare the tBLM (see SI for details).
Similar to the experiments with ubiquinone, no inactivation is observed
at high potentials.(a) Chronoamperogram showing the evolution of the MBH
activity
after the injection of a H2-saturated aliquot of buffer
into the cell solution flushed with N2 (+0.497 V vs SHE;
30 °C, pH 7.4). (b) Chronoamperometry of the MBH (+0.397 V vs
SHE, 100% H2, pH 7.4, 30 °C). The current is used
to determine the hydrogen oxidation activity, which is normalized
to 100% at the start of the experiment. An aliquot (one-fourth volume
of the final cell volume) of air-saturated buffer was inserted into
the electrochemical cell at 270 s. The exponential decay of the O2 concentration was plotted according to the equation: C(t) = C(0) exp(−t/τ), C is concentration, t is time), and τ is the time constant for exponential
gas removal and was determined to be 22 s under these conditions (see Figure S2).Using a method developed by Léger et al.,[23] the apparent Michaelis–Menten constant
for hydrogen
(KM(app)) was calculated with ubiquinone
as electron acceptor. The method involves the addition of a H2-saturated aliquot to a stirred working solution which is
continuously flushed with N2, while the working electrode
potential is maintained at a fixed positive value (Figure 3a). The value of KM(app) can be calculated by analyzing the sigmoidal current decay as the
gases (in this case H2) are removed from solution following
an exponential decay. The exponential time-dependency of gas removal
from solution was confirmed through independent experiments (see Figure S2). Table 1 shows
that KM(app) increases with the applied
electrode potential, suggesting that at high H2 concentrations
ubiquinol/ubiquinone cycling might be limiting the rate of H2 oxidation, especially at potentials below 0.5 V. CVs were measured
at increasing H2 concentration to further support the KM(app) values in Table 1 (see Figure S3). As previously reported
with PFE, a delay is observed in Figure 3a
between the time of H2 injection and the time at which
the maximum activity is attained (∼50s).[9a] The origin of this delay remains unclear, and studies are
ongoing to test if this delay is due to reactivation of MBH that has
been inactivated in the absence of hydrogen.
Figure 3
(a) Chronoamperogram showing the evolution of the MBH
activity
after the injection of a H2-saturated aliquot of buffer
into the cell solution flushed with N2 (+0.497 V vs SHE;
30 °C, pH 7.4). (b) Chronoamperometry of the MBH (+0.397 V vs
SHE, 100% H2, pH 7.4, 30 °C). The current is used
to determine the hydrogen oxidation activity, which is normalized
to 100% at the start of the experiment. An aliquot (one-fourth volume
of the final cell volume) of air-saturated buffer was inserted into
the electrochemical cell at 270 s. The exponential decay of the O2 concentration was plotted according to the equation: C(t) = C(0) exp(−t/τ), C is concentration, t is time), and τ is the time constant for exponential
gas removal and was determined to be 22 s under these conditions (see Figure S2).
Table 1
Value of KM(app) (± SEM) at Different Potentialsa
potential
(V vs SHE)
+0.397
+0.497
+0.597
KM(app) (μM)
1.5 ± 0.3 (n = 3)
2.1 ± 0.9 (n = 8)
9.2 ± 2.7 (n = 5)
Number of independent experiments
is given by n.
Number of independent experiments
is given by n.Aerobic inactivation was investigated using chronoamperometry by
adding an aliquot of air-equilibrated buffer to the stirred working
solution while the current resulting from H2 oxidation
is monitored in time (Figure 3b). The electrode
potential is held at a constant positive value at which the ubiquinone
remains almost fully oxidized, ensuring a sufficiently high H2 oxidation activity of the MBH. We note that ubiquinol oxidases
are also present in the cytoplasmic membrane extracts and will oxidize
ubiquinol in the presence of O2. This will reduce the observed
catalytic current due to H2 oxidation. The catalytic activity
of ubiquinol oxidases can be directly observed at low potentials in
CVs recorded in the presence of 10% O2 (Figure S4). After addition of 57 μM O2 (equivalent
to one-fourth of the ambient concentration of dissolved O2), the H2 oxidation current drops very fast to ∼75
± 1.4% (n = 12) of the initial current due to
the oxidative conversion of the [NiFe] active site to the Ni–B
state and possibly due to competing oxygen reduction (Figure 3b). The same behavior was observed at the higher
potentials of 0.5 V. In the presence of 5% O2 (50 μM),
MBH thus maintains at least three-quarters of its initial activity
and begins to recover activity immediately after the injection, long
before all O2 is flushed out of the cell by H2. The observed recovery in current seems to mirror that of the predicted
O2 concentration in the cell, suggesting that activation
and inactivation kinetics of MBH are in equilibrium during the experiment
or that the decrease in current is solely due to ubiquinol oxidase
activity. Importantly, the recovery of activity does not require less
oxidative potentials, indicating that the “ready” inactive
state (Ni–B) can be reduced back to the active state even when
the ubiquinone pool is almost fully oxidized.In conclusion,
the present study shows that, unlike the hydrophilic
heterodimeric subcomplex, the heterotrimeric MBH, in equilibrium with
the quinone pool, does not undergo anaerobic inactivation under oxidative
redox conditions. This implies that when the cytochrome b562 subunit is in equilibrium with its substrate (the
ubiquinone pool) and acts as a primary electron acceptor of the hydrophilic
αβ heterodimer, the [NiFe] active site is protected from
permanently resting in the Ni–B state, even when H2 is scarce and the ubiquinone pool almost fully oxidized. In addition,
although MBH is inactivated by O2 it immediately recovers
activity even under highly oxidative redox conditions. We cannot exclude
the possibility that reactivation (reduction of the Ni–B state)
is driven by ubiquinol oxidation by a reversed electron flow from
cytochrome b562 to the [NiFe] active site.
However, at the extreme potentials applied (up to 0.6 V), we expect
that only diminishing amounts of reduced ubiquinol are present in
the tBLM. Instead, we propose that reactivation is related to the
occurrence of higher oligomeric states of the MBH in the membrane.
We have previously provided evidence to indicate that MBH forms tripartite
supercomplexes of heterotrimeric complexes in the native lipid membrane
and proposed that one heterotrimer donates electrons from H2 oxidation to reactivate a neighboring heterotrimer which is in the
Ni–B state.[8b] Recently, a crystal
structure of a dimer of a MBH subcomplex from E. coli (hydrogenase 1) showed that the distance between two distal [FeS]
clusters is short, supporting the hypothesis that intermolecular electron
transfer is possible.[24]
Authors: Abbas Abou Hamdan; Bénédicte Burlat; Oscar Gutiérrez-Sanz; Pierre-Pol Liebgott; Carole Baffert; Antonio L De Lacey; Marc Rousset; Bruno Guigliarelli; Christophe Léger; Sébastien Dementin Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Maxie M Roessler; Rhiannon M Evans; Rosalind A Davies; Jeffrey Harmer; Fraser A Armstrong Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Michael Hambourger; Miguel Gervaldo; Drazenka Svedruzic; Paul W King; Devens Gust; Maria Ghirardi; Ana L Moore; Thomas A Moore Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-01-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Michael J Lukey; Maxie M Roessler; Alison Parkin; Rhiannon M Evans; Rosalind A Davies; Oliver Lenz; Baerbel Friedrich; Frank Sargent; Fraser A Armstrong Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-10-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Julian Szczesny; Nikola Marković; Felipe Conzuelo; Sónia Zacarias; Inês A C Pereira; Wolfgang Lubitz; Nicolas Plumeré; Wolfgang Schuhmann; Adrian Ruff Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: V Vasilca; A Sadeghpour; S Rawson; L E Hawke; S A Baldwin; T Wilkinson; D Bannister; V L G Postis; M Rappolt; S P Muench; L J C Jeuken Journal: Anal Biochem Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 3.365
Authors: Adrian Ruff; Julian Szczesny; Nikola Marković; Felipe Conzuelo; Sónia Zacarias; Inês A C Pereira; Wolfgang Lubitz; Wolfgang Schuhmann Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 14.919