Huaiguang Li1, Darren Buesen1, Sébastien Dementin2, Christophe Léger2, Vincent Fourmond2, Nicolas Plumeré1. 1. Center for Electrochemical Sciences (CES), Faculty of Chemistry and Biochemistry , Ruhr University Bochum , Universitätsstr. 150 , D-44780 Bochum , Germany. 2. CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Laboratoire de Bioénergétique et Ingénierie des Proteínes , Marseille , France.
Abstract
Energy conversion schemes involving dihydrogen hold great potential for meeting sustainable energy needs, but widespread implementation cannot proceed without solutions that mitigate the cost of rare metal catalysts and the O2 instability of biological and bioinspired replacements. Recently, thick films (>100 μm) of redox polymers were shown to prevent O2 catalyst damage but also resulted in unnecessary catalyst load and mass transport limitations. Here we apply novel homogeneous thin films (down to 3 μm) that provide protection from O2 while achieving highly efficient catalyst utilization. Our empirical data are explained by modeling, demonstrating that resistance to O2 inactivation can be obtained for nonlimiting periods of time when the optimal thickness for catalyst utilization and current generation is achieved, even when using highly fragile catalysts such as the enzyme hydrogenase. We show that different protection mechanisms operate depending on the matrix dimensions and the intrinsic catalyst properties and can be integrated together synergistically to achieve stable H2 oxidation currents in the presence of O2, potentially enabling a plethora of practical applications for bioinspired catalysts under harsh oxidative conditions.
Energy conversion schemes involving dihydrogen hold great potential for meeting sustainable energy needs, but widespread implementation cannot proceed without solutions that mitigate the cost of rare metal catalysts and the O2 instability of biological and bioinspired replacements. Recently, thick films (>100 μm) of redox polymers were shown to prevent O2 catalyst damage but also resulted in unnecessary catalyst load and mass transport limitations. Here we apply novel homogeneous thin films (down to 3 μm) that provide protection from O2 while achieving highly efficient catalyst utilization. Our empirical data are explained by modeling, demonstrating that resistance to O2 inactivation can be obtained for nonlimiting periods of time when the optimal thickness for catalyst utilization and current generation is achieved, even when using highly fragile catalysts such as the enzyme hydrogenase. We show that different protection mechanisms operate depending on the matrix dimensions and the intrinsic catalyst properties and can be integrated together synergistically to achieve stable H2 oxidation currents in the presence of O2, potentially enabling a plethora of practical applications for bioinspired catalysts under harsh oxidative conditions.
The need for a global
implementation of sustainable energy schemes
drives the search for cost-effective clean energy sources and storage
technologies. In energy conversion processes, catalysts based on earth-abundant
elements are needed to replace rare-metal-based anodes such as platinum
for the efficient generation and conversion of key energy carriers
such as dihydrogen. Recent advances in molecular catalysis,[1−5] inspired by the understanding of enzymes,[6] have raised expectations for the development of cheap, highly active
catalysts. However, in contrast with materials based on noble metals,
molecular and biological systems easily deactivate when used under
operating conditions that are relevant for real-world applications.[7] One particular challenge is an oxidative degradation,
as observed for molecular catalysts for H2 oxidation[8] and enzymes capable of H2/H+ interconversion such as hydrogenase (H2ase, Figure A).[9] Because the strict exclusion of O2 over a long-term
operation in water splitting cells or fuel cells is impossible, due
to membrane crossovers or contamination by O2 from air,
the current paradigm in chemical energy conversion is to increase
the resistance of the catalyst to O2-induced damage.
Figure 1
Redox films
as protection matrices for hydrogenases. (A) Structure
of the [NiFe(CN)2CN] active site of D. fructosovorans NiFe hydrogenase, used herein as a model of O2-sensitive
catalyst, showing the nearby valine 74 and its deactivation/reactivation
in the presence of O2. The whole enzyme is globular, with
a diameter of ∼10 nm, Mw = 90 kDa.
(B) Schematic representation of viologen-modified dendrimers (detailed
structure is given in ref (20), diameter around 5 nm, Mw =
20 kDa) used as building blocks for the assembly of the redox matrix.
The viologen moieties act as electron relays and O2-reducing
catalysts. The thioacetate group is used as a cross-linking functionality
for gelation, leading to film formation. (C) Scheme of the redox matrix
homogeneously constituted of hydrogenase molecules and viologen-modified
dendrimers. Under turnover for H2 oxidation in the presence
of O2, several reaction layers form within the matrix.
A first layer of H2 oxidation reaction (H2 ox.)
in the vicinity of the electrode produces electrons used for current
generation (electrocatalytic layer). A second H2 ox. layer
associated with a layer of O2 reduction reaction (O2 red.) near the film/electrolyte interface reduces the incoming
O2 (protection layer). (D) Kinetic scheme of the reaction–diffusion
processes considered for modeling of the two proposed protection mechanisms:
(1) reduction of the incoming O2 and (2) reactivation of
the inhibited catalyst. (Definitions of all parameters are given in Table S1.) (E) Fraction of the catalyst contributing
to current (top) and catalytic current (bottom) under anaerobic conditions
as a function of the film thickness. Regimes V, VII, and III are defined
by Bartlett and Pratt[22] as cases in which
the current is primarily limited by catalysis, electron transfer,
and mass transport, respectively. VIIa and VIIb are the subregimes
specific to protection from O2 described in this Article.
(F) Depiction of the fluxes of H2 (gray), O2 (red), and electrons (blue) associated with electrocatalysis and
protection from O2 in each of the different operating regimes
(III, VIIb, and VIIa).
Redox films
as protection matrices for hydrogenases. (A) Structure
of the [NiFe(CN)2CN] active site of D. fructosovoransNiFe hydrogenase, used herein as a model of O2-sensitive
catalyst, showing the nearby valine 74 and its deactivation/reactivation
in the presence of O2. The whole enzyme is globular, with
a diameter of ∼10 nm, Mw = 90 kDa.
(B) Schematic representation of viologen-modified dendrimers (detailed
structure is given in ref (20), diameter around 5 nm, Mw =
20 kDa) used as building blocks for the assembly of the redox matrix.
The viologen moieties act as electron relays and O2-reducing
catalysts. The thioacetate group is used as a cross-linking functionality
for gelation, leading to film formation. (C) Scheme of the redox matrix
homogeneously constituted of hydrogenase molecules and viologen-modified
dendrimers. Under turnover for H2 oxidation in the presence
of O2, several reaction layers form within the matrix.
A first layer of H2 oxidation reaction (H2 ox.)
in the vicinity of the electrode produces electrons used for current
generation (electrocatalytic layer). A second H2 ox. layer
associated with a layer of O2 reduction reaction (O2 red.) near the film/electrolyte interface reduces the incoming
O2 (protection layer). (D) Kinetic scheme of the reaction–diffusion
processes considered for modeling of the two proposed protection mechanisms:
(1) reduction of the incoming O2 and (2) reactivation of
the inhibited catalyst. (Definitions of all parameters are given in Table S1.) (E) Fraction of the catalyst contributing
to current (top) and catalytic current (bottom) under anaerobic conditions
as a function of the film thickness. Regimes V, VII, and III are defined
by Bartlett and Pratt[22] as cases in which
the current is primarily limited by catalysis, electron transfer,
and mass transport, respectively. VIIa and VIIb are the subregimes
specific to protection from O2 described in this Article.
(F) Depiction of the fluxes of H2 (gray), O2 (red), and electrons (blue) associated with electrocatalysis and
protection from O2 in each of the different operating regimes
(III, VIIb, and VIIa).However, recent developments
in protective matrices have also allowed
the possibility of using O2-sensitive catalysts in an oxidative
environment. Such matrices consist of a film of redox polymer deposited
onto an electrode and embedding a catalyst such as a hydrogenase.
Matrix-bound viologens (Figure B) can serve as redox moieties, owing to their ability to
shuttle electrons within the film, their fast charge exchange with
hydrogenases, their matching redox potential for H2 oxidation,
and, most importantly, their catalytic activity for O2 reduction.
These properties allow for the diversion of electrons generated from
H2 oxidation toward the reduction of the O2 molecules
that penetrate the film at the matrix/solution interface,[10−12] so that the hydrogenase molecules immobilized within the film are
shielded from O2 (labels (1) in Figures D and 1F). Hence the
enzymes do not experience the oxidative conditions of an operating
fuel cell and thus maintain their activity under conditions that are
relevant for practical applications. This breakthrough in catalyst
protection, initially developed for electrocatalytic H2 oxidation with a NiFe hydrogenase,[10] has
since been applied to various other catalysts.[12−15]However, the actual use
of such protective matrices has been limited
because this protection mechanism was demonstrated only for thick
films (>100 μm), in which the H2 oxidation reaction
layer that sends electrons toward the electrode (electrocatalytic
layer) is very thin. Hence, the vast majority of the catalyst does
not contribute to current generation (Figure E, top). Moreover, the catalytic performances
of the film are suboptimal because the H2 oxidation current
is limited by the H2 transport within the film (Figure E, bottom). Therefore,
thick films provide protection at the cost of mediocre properties
in terms of catalyst usage within the matrix and absolute current
output.Until now, thin films have not been explored in this
context because
thickness was assumed to be an inherent requirement for protection.
In addition, the preparation of thin films embedding hydrogenase was
impossible until recently because of the poor control of matrix morphology.Here we apply a new method based on redox dendrimers that enables
the formation of catalytic films of controlled and homogeneous thickness.
Our results demonstrate not only that the robust O2 protection
of a catalyst in a film 6 μm thick is feasible but also that
the observed catalytic protection is actually superior to that provided
by analogous thick films. This protection coincides with the maximum
performance in terms of the catalytic current (Figure F) while maintaining the stability and effective
catalyst utilization required for technological applicability. We
also show that the minimal thickness that affords O2 immunity
can be further decreased by using modified hydrogenases whose rate
of reductive reactivation is increased. Under these conditions, the
fraction of sacrificial catalyst is negligible. Theoretical models
of the protection mechanisms that predict currents and concentration
gradients within the redox matrix explain our empirical observation
of the effectiveness of thin redox films against catalyst inactivation
by O2 and indicate that quasi-infinite protection can be
achieved for the hydrogenase even when it is used in minimized loading.
These are the key requirements for cost-effective and practical implementations
of cheap molecular and bioinspired catalysts under the harsh oxidative
conditions of energy-converting devices.
Results
Bioanodes
utilizing Desulfovibrio fructosovoransNiFe hydrogenase
as a catalyst in viologen-modified dendrimer films[20] of distinct thicknesses (66, 6, and 3.5 μm)
were generated (see SI Section S2) to determine
the enzyme stability and performance (Figure ). For comparison, wild-type (WT, i.e., unmodified)
NiFe hydrogenase and a previously described O2-resistant
V74C mutant[16] were cast in thin films.
Whereas an O2-sensitive NiFe hydrogenase directly connected
to an electrode quickly becomes completely inactivated in the presence
of O2,[21] the same enzyme incorporated
in a redox matrix is protected from O2 damage,[10] as shown in Figure A. However, Figure shows that the variation in H2 oxidation catalytic current upon exposure to O2 strongly
depends on the film thickness and on the nature of the catalyst. Whereas
the thickest film (66 μm) shows a loss in current that is fully
reversed by the removal of O2 (Figure A), films that are one order of magnitude
thinner (6 μm) are apparently completely unaffected by O2 (Figure B).
With a film that is only slightly thinner (3.5 μm), the catalytic
current rapidly collapses and is only partially recovered upon returning
to anaerobic conditions (Figure C). In contrast, when the V74C H2ase mutant
is used, the aerobic current of this thinnest film drops to a steady-state
value and fully recovers after O2 is removed (Figure D).
Figure 2
Experimental current
responses of viologen-modified films embedding Desulfovibrio
fructosovorans NiFe hydrogenase, catalyzing
H2 oxidation, and being exposed to O2. Wild-type
(WT, i.e., unmodified) NiFe hydrogenase embedded in films with decreasing
thicknesses from left to right: (A) 66 μm, regime III; (B) 6
μm, regime VIIb; and (C) 3.5 μm, regime VIIa. (D) O2-resistant site-directed mutant (V74C[16]) embedded in a film with a thickness corresponding to regime VIIa
for comparison with panel C. The behavior of films in regimes III
and VIIb using the V74C mutant is shown in Figure S1. The top panels show the O2 concentration (the
shaded areas represent O2 exposure), and the bottom panels
show the change in H2 oxidation current divided by the
value under anaerobic conditions, J/J0, against time, t, counted from the
beginning of exposure to O2. The anaerobic conditions correspond
to 100% H2. Aerobic conditions correspond to 5% O2 in 95% H2. Note that 5% O2 is just below the
explosion limit for H2/O2 gas mixtures[17] and well above what would be expected under
operational conditions in a fuel cell. In all cases, iodide was present
in the electrolyte (phosphate buffer, 0.1 M, pH 7 with KI 0.1 M) to
minimize H2O2 accumulation;[18,19] this is more convenient than including large enzymes such as catalase.
The electrodes were held at a constant potential of 0.21 V versus
SHE and rotated at 2000 rpm. The current behavior of films with thicknesses
near the regime transitions (4.5 and 33 μm) is shown in Figure S2.
Experimental current
responses of viologen-modified films embedding Desulfovibrio
fructosovorans NiFe hydrogenase, catalyzing
H2 oxidation, and being exposed to O2. Wild-type
(WT, i.e., unmodified) NiFe hydrogenase embedded in films with decreasing
thicknesses from left to right: (A) 66 μm, regime III; (B) 6
μm, regime VIIb; and (C) 3.5 μm, regime VIIa. (D) O2-resistant site-directed mutant (V74C[16]) embedded in a film with a thickness corresponding to regime VIIa
for comparison with panel C. The behavior of films in regimes III
and VIIb using the V74C mutant is shown in Figure S1. The top panels show the O2 concentration (the
shaded areas represent O2 exposure), and the bottom panels
show the change in H2 oxidation current divided by the
value under anaerobic conditions, J/J0, against time, t, counted from the
beginning of exposure to O2. The anaerobic conditions correspond
to 100% H2. Aerobic conditions correspond to 5% O2 in 95% H2. Note that 5% O2 is just below the
explosion limit for H2/O2 gas mixtures[17] and well above what would be expected under
operational conditions in a fuel cell. In all cases, iodide was present
in the electrolyte (phosphate buffer, 0.1 M, pH 7 with KI 0.1 M) to
minimize H2O2 accumulation;[18,19] this is more convenient than including large enzymes such as catalase.
The electrodes were held at a constant potential of 0.21 V versus
SHE and rotated at 2000 rpm. The current behavior of films with thicknesses
near the regime transitions (4.5 and 33 μm) is shown in Figure S2.We used theoretical modeling (Figures –6) to explain these unexpected experimental observations and elucidate
the underlying kinetics in the reaction–diffusion systems (Figure D). We have considered
the diffusion and reaction of the various species (reduced and oxidized
viologen; reduced, oxidized, and inactive enzyme; O2 and
H2) within the depth of the film, the thickness of which
is . We also considered
the diffusion of substrate
H2 and O2 (diffusion coefficients DS and DO, respectively) and
electron hopping between the immobilized viologen moieties. (This
is also a diffusion process, with an apparent diffusion coefficient
of the electron DA; AΣ is the viologen concentration.) The enzyme (total
concentration EΣ) is immobilized
and reacts with the oxidized viologen (rate constant ka) and with the substrate H2 (Michaelis parameters kcat, KM); it can
also be inactivated by O2 (bimolecular inactivation rate
constant ki) and reactivated upon the
reaction with reduced viologen (bimolecular rate constant kr). The reduced viologen also reduces O2 with a bimolecular rate constant ko.[11] The reaction–diffusion system
depends on 16 independent parameters (three diffusion coefficient,
four concentrations, seven kinetic parameters, film thickness, and
time). Figures –6 and Figure S1 show numerical
solutions of the model obtained by varying only two parameters (the
thickness of the film and the rate, kr, at which the inactive enzyme is reactivated upon reduction); all
other parameters were fixed to their experimentally determined values.
(See the details in SI Sections S3 and S4).
Figure 3
Simulated concentration profiles within the thick film (66 μm,
regime III) explaining the current response shown in Figure A and predicting the protection
lifetime. (A) Anaerobic and (B) aerobic dimensionless calculated concentration
profiles within the viologen-modified films embedding WT hydrogenase,
catalyzing H2 oxidation (bottom panels). The black arrow
illustrates the rate of progress of the front of the inactive enzyme.
A discontinuous x axis is used to zoom in on the
thin reaction layers near the inner and outer edges of the film. The
local rates of consumption (top panels) of H2 (gray) and
O2 (red) are obtained from the second derivative of the
concentration profile of each species; the horizontal dotted lines
mark Y = 0. The dimensionless distance to the electrode
ξ is x/. (C) Change
in simulated current divided
by the value under anaerobic conditions, j/j0, against dimensionless time, τ (τ
= tkaEΣ, counted from the beginning of exposure to O2). (D) Simulated
position of the front of the inactive enzyme, ξf, against dimensionless time; the dashed red line is
the model. (See SI Section S6.4 and eqs S6.62 and S6.70).
Figure 6
Effect of the reactivation of the enzyme by reduced viologen
on
the behavior of the thin film in regime VIIa, as observed in Figure D. (A) Anaerobic
and (B) aerobic dimensionless simulated concentration profiles within
the viologen-modified films embedding O2-resistant site-directed
mutant (V74C) hydrogenase, catalyzing H2 oxidation (bottom
panels). The black arrow illustrates the rate of progress of the front
of the inactive enzyme. The local rate of consumption of H2 (gray) and O2 (red) was obtained from the second derivative
of the concentration profile of each species (top panels); the horizontal
dotted lines mark Y = 0. The dimensionless distance
to the electrode ξ is x/. (C)
Change in simulated current divided
by the value under anaerobic conditions, j/j0, against τ. (D) Simulated position of
the front of the inactive enzyme ξf against dimensionless time τ. (E) Dependence of the normalized
position of the front of the inactive enzyme, ξf,
and (F) the aerobic current, j/j0, as a function of the dimensionless rate of reactivation kr/ki for various
values of the dimensionless thickness, κ; see SI Section S6.5. The black dot indicates the situation in Figure D. Calculations were
for the values of the parameters in Table S2.
Simulated concentration profiles within the thick film (66 μm,
regime III) explaining the current response shown in Figure A and predicting the protection
lifetime. (A) Anaerobic and (B) aerobic dimensionless calculated concentration
profiles within the viologen-modified films embedding WT hydrogenase,
catalyzing H2 oxidation (bottom panels). The black arrow
illustrates the rate of progress of the front of the inactive enzyme.
A discontinuous x axis is used to zoom in on the
thin reaction layers near the inner and outer edges of the film. The
local rates of consumption (top panels) of H2 (gray) and
O2 (red) are obtained from the second derivative of the
concentration profile of each species; the horizontal dotted lines
mark Y = 0. The dimensionless distance to the electrode
ξ is x/. (C) Change
in simulated current divided
by the value under anaerobic conditions, j/j0, against dimensionless time, τ (τ
= tkaEΣ, counted from the beginning of exposure to O2). (D) Simulated
position of the front of the inactive enzyme, ξf, against dimensionless time; the dashed red line is
the model. (See SI Section S6.4 and eqs S6.62 and S6.70).To frame the various
rates of diffusion, kinetic reactions, and
protective states within the films, we discuss our results in terms
of different “regimes”, each of which defines a region
of the parameter space for which the system behaves in a certain manner.
Bartlett and Pratt[22] defined seven regimes
for the case of a uniform film containing a mediator and an enzyme
under anaerobic conditions. For example, the so-called “regime
III” (described for the anaerobic conditions in ref (22) and for the aerobic conditions
in ref (11)), is observed
when the dimensionless thickness of the film is large; it corresponds to the situation
of very thick films, where the current response is limited by the
long-range diffusion of the substrate and electrons, as described
before.[11] In SI Section S5, we demonstrate the kinetic regime assignments before O2 exposure.
Thick Films (Regime III, Figures A and 3)
For the sake
of comparison with our new results, we start by recalling the experimental
behavior[10] and theory[11] for a thick viologen-modified film containing hydrogenase.[22] In thick films, the oxidation of H2 is confined to a region close to the electrode where the concentration
profiles of oxidized viologen and hydrogen overlap. (The peak in gray
in the top panel of Figure A shows where H2 is consumed.) The resulting steady-state
catalytic anaerobic current density J0 is limited by the mass transport of both H2 and electrons;
the thicker the film, the stronger the limitations due to mass transport,
and the smaller the currentThe anaerobic current is essentially
proportional to the bulk concentration of H2 (= S∞), as indeed experimentally observed
for the 66 μm film (Figure S6A).
According to the parameter values in SI Section S3, films thicker than 29.5 μm are in regime III. This
is confirmed by the experimental current response to O2 of a film with a thickness just above this regime transition (33
μm, Figure S2B), which displays similar
behavior to the 66 μm thick films. Moreover, for films with > 29.5
μm, the experimental anaerobic
current density decreases with increasing film thicknesses (0.62 ±
0.06 mA/cm2 for ≈ 30
μm compared with 0.38
± 0.1 mA/cm2 for ≈
60 μm), which is in agreement
with eq and thus further
supports the regime III assignment.Introducing O2 into the solution slightly decreases the steady-state catalytic
current density, J, as observed in Figure A (66 μm film) and previously
predicted[11]The numerical application
of eq based on the
parameter values listed in Table S1 gives J/J0 = 0.96, in agreement with
the experimental results in Figure A and Figure S2 and the
simulation in Figure D. Regarding the transient response and the results from the model
given in Figure (and
also Figures –6 and Figure S1), the
only significant difference between the experimental and simulated
currents is that the former shows a gradual current change, whereas
the latter show a sharp step upon the addition of O2. This
is because we simulate the current for an instantaneous change in
O2 concentration, whereas the experimental current reacts
to a gradual change in O2 concentration (controlled by
purging the electrolyte with a gas mixture containing 5% O2). The transient in the current follows the experimental change in
O2 concentration given in the top panels of Figure .
Figure 4
Simulated concentration
profiles within the thin film (6 μm,
regime VIIb) explaining the current response shown in Figure B and predicting the protection
lifetime. (A) Anaerobic and (B) aerobic dimensionless calculated concentration
profiles within the viologen-modified films embedding WT hydrogenase,
catalyzing H2 oxidation (bottom panels). The black arrow
illustrates the rate of progress of the front of the inactive enzyme.
The local rate of consumption of H2 (gray) and O2 (red) was obtained from the second derivative of the concentration
profile of each species (top panels). (C) Change in simulated current
divided by the value under anaerobic conditions, j/j0, against τ. (D) Simulated position
of the front of the inactive enzyme ξf = xf/ against
dimensionless time, τ (O2 is introduced at τ
= 0); the dashed red line is the
model. (See SI Section S6.4 and eqs S6.62 and S6.70). See SI Section S7 and Figure S11 for the result of a simulation of
constant exposure to O2 until the film collapses.
Simulated concentration
profiles within the thin film (6 μm,
regime VIIb) explaining the current response shown in Figure B and predicting the protection
lifetime. (A) Anaerobic and (B) aerobic dimensionless calculated concentration
profiles within the viologen-modified films embedding WT hydrogenase,
catalyzing H2 oxidation (bottom panels). The black arrow
illustrates the rate of progress of the front of the inactive enzyme.
The local rate of consumption of H2 (gray) and O2 (red) was obtained from the second derivative of the concentration
profile of each species (top panels). (C) Change in simulated current
divided by the value under anaerobic conditions, j/j0, against τ. (D) Simulated position
of the front of the inactive enzyme ξf = xf/ against
dimensionless time, τ (O2 is introduced at τ
= 0); the dashed red line is the
model. (See SI Section S6.4 and eqs S6.62 and S6.70). See SI Section S7 and Figure S11 for the result of a simulation of
constant exposure to O2 until the film collapses.The protection mechanism can
be understood
by examining the corresponding concentration profiles (Figure B).[11] Dioxygen (whose concentration profile is shown in red) penetrates
the film, inactivates the enzyme, and oxidizes the viologen near the
film/solution interface. The oxidized viologen (pink) diffuses inward,
allowing catalytic hydrogen oxidation in an outer catalytic layer
(peak at ξ = 0.93 in Figure B, top panel). The resulting reduced viologen (blue)
diffuses out and consumes the incoming O2 in the outermost
reaction layer (red peak at ξ = 0.97 in Figure B). Exposing the film to O2 decreases
the hydrogen oxidation current because O2 reduction uses
a fraction of the incoming flux of H2. The enzyme is inactivated
by O2 in an outer layer comprised between x = xf and x = , where is the thickness
of the film. The size – xf of this layer of inactive enzyme (black in Figure B) keeps increasing,
very slowly, in proportion
to the logarithm of time[11] (eq )The dashed red line in Figure D shows this prediction.
The only difference from Fourmond et al.[11] is that we better estimated the duration of the transient (that
is, the time delay between the exposure to O2 and the moment
the front of the inactive enzyme starts moving in at a steady-state
rate, log10(τ) = 1.2 in Figure D; see SI Section S6.4 and eqs S6.62 and S6.70). This transient (log10(τ)
< 1) corresponds to the initial penetration of O2, followed
by the inactivation of the enzyme in this outer region of the film;
the latter step is the slowest (with the values of the parameters
in Table S1) and fully determines the duration
of the transient, which is therefore proportional to the reciprocal
of ki. The rate of progression of the
front of inactive enzyme (eq and red line in Figure D) does not depend on ki, but the duration of the transient (eq S6.70), and therefore the lifetime of the film (eq S6.73), depends on ki. However, eq S6.73 shows that the parameters present in eq (which are all independent
of the properties of the catalyst) have a much bigger impact on the
lifetime than ki. We also note that despite
the movement of the front of inactive enzyme, the aerobic current
is constant (eq ).[11]Most importantly, the protection of thick
films in regime III results
from the separation of reaction zones (Figure B, top panel) and from the very slow movement
of the invading layer of inactive enzyme, which together provide very
long lifetimes. This protection comes at a cost: Most of the catalyst
is unused or used for protection rather than catalysis (Figure F), and the current is limited
by long-range diffusion.
Thin Films in Regime VII under Anaerobic
Conditions (Figures B,C, 4, and 5)
The 6 and 3.5 μm
films are in what Bartlett and Pratt referred to as regime VII.[22] Under anaerobic conditions, the concentration
profiles are as shown in Figures A and 5A (bottom panels): There
is little H2 depletion in the film, and the current is
limited by the rate of electron transfer. H2 oxidation
occurs near the surface of electrode in a steady-state reaction layer
whose size is determined by the mutual compensation of H2 oxidation and electron diffusion, and the anaerobic current is therefore
independent of (22)Figure S6B,C confirms for the 6 and 3.5 μm films the nonlinear
dependence of the value of the current on the H2 concentration
under anaerobic conditions, in quantitative agreement with eq . The experimental value
for the anaerobic current density in regime VII is 0.55 ± 0.1
mA/cm2 (for the four electrodes in regime VII shown in Figure and Figure S2).
Figure 5
Simulated concentration profiles within
the thinnest film (3.5
μm, regime VIIa) explaining the current response shown in Figure C and predicting
the protection lifetime. (A) Anaerobic and (B) aerobic dimensionless
calculated concentration profiles within the viologen-modified films
embedding WT hydrogenase, catalyzing H2 oxidation (bottom
panels). The black arrow illustrates the rate of progress of the front
of the inactive enzyme. The local rate of consumption of H2 (gray) and O2 (red) was obtained from the second derivative
of the concentration profile of each species (top panels); the horizontal
dotted lines mark Y = 0. The dimensionless distance
to the electrode ξ is x/. (C)
Change in the simulated current divided
by the value under anaerobic conditions, j/j0, against τ. (D) Simulated position of
the front of the inactive enzyme, ξf, against dimensionless time, τ.
Simulated concentration profiles within
the thinnest film (3.5
μm, regime VIIa) explaining the current response shown in Figure C and predicting
the protection lifetime. (A) Anaerobic and (B) aerobic dimensionless
calculated concentration profiles within the viologen-modified films
embedding WT hydrogenase, catalyzing H2 oxidation (bottom
panels). The black arrow illustrates the rate of progress of the front
of the inactive enzyme. The local rate of consumption of H2 (gray) and O2 (red) was obtained from the second derivative
of the concentration profile of each species (top panels); the horizontal
dotted lines mark Y = 0. The dimensionless distance
to the electrode ξ is x/. (C)
Change in the simulated current divided
by the value under anaerobic conditions, j/j0, against τ. (D) Simulated position of
the front of the inactive enzyme, ξf, against dimensionless time, τ.In considering the additional effect of O2, we shall
distinguish two subcases of regime VII, VIIb (Figure , 6 μm) and VIIa (Figure , 3.5 μm).
Thin Films
under Aerobic Conditions (Regime VIIb, Figures B and 4)
Unexpectedly, we found that decreasing the film thickness
does not come at the expense of resistance to O2. Exposure
to O2 actually has no effect on the current of the 6 μm
thick film (Figure B), consistent with the corresponding simulation in Figure C. The aerobic concentration
profiles in Figure B (bottom panel) explain why the current is nearly independent of
the presence of O2: As in regime III, the reduction of
O2 decreases the incoming flux of H2 and the
concentration of H2 in the inner reaction layer, but because
the concentration of H2 remains greater than the Michaelis
constant, the enzyme remains saturated. Therefore, the decrease in
H2 concentration has little impact on the catalytic rates
and thus on the current.In SI Section S6.3.1, we demonstrate
that the relative change in current upon exposure to O2 in regime VIIb isThe observed decrease in current
is actually tiny because the KM of NiFe
hydrogenase is small (∼5 μM, ref (21)). The above estimation
assumes that under anaerobic conditions, there is no depletion of
H2; numerical application gives 1 – J/J0 = 7 × 10–5 compared with 7 ×
10–4 in Figure C. A more accurate estimation, taking the depletion
of H2 into account and giving 1 – J/J0 = 1.1 × 10–4, is described in SI Section S6.3.1. Note
that eq is independent
of the bulk concentration of O2.In this regime,
although the current is not significantly affected
by the presence of O2, the layer of inactive enzyme keeps
moving in, as shown in Figure D, where the dashed line shows the theoretical prediction:
The rate of progression is the same as in regime III (eq ). Supplementary Figure S12 shows a plot of simulated and calculated lifetimes
versus for the conditions
in Figure . Under
the conditions of Figure B, we calculate that
the film becomes totally invaded with an inactive enzyme at τ
= 108.2, corresponding to 1 year (with τ/t = kaEΣ = 4.8; see Figure S11).
More generally, increasing the film thickness by 1 μm increases
the lifetime by over two orders of magnitude (Figure S12). From a practical perspective, this means that
the hydrogenase in the electrocatalytic reaction layer can be protected
quasi-infinitely from O2 in this regime.
Even Thinner
Films under Aerobic Conditions (Regime VIIa, Figures C and 5)
The independence of the catalytic hydrogen oxidation
current on O2 observed in Figure B results from the separation of the two
H2 oxidation reaction layers (Figure B, top panel). A distinct subclass of regime
VII (that we call VIIa) is observed when the film is so small that
the two H2 oxidation catalytic layers merge, as shown in Figure C with a film of
3.5 μm. This film is still in regime VII under anaerobic conditions,
so the equation for the anaerobic current is as described above (eq ), but the relative decrease
in current just after the film is exposed to O2 is significant,
as explained in SI Section S6.2. The formation
of a single H2 oxidation catalytic layer implies that current
generation and protection from O2 compete for electrons,
which significantly decreases the reduced viologen concentration gradients
(Figure B). Hence
the flux of electrons toward the film–electrolyte interface
decreases to the extent that it does not counterbalance the flux of
O2. The imbalance is amplified by the formation of an inactive
enzyme, which leads to fast O2 penetration in the very
thin film (Figure B, bottom panel, and Figure D), and, indeed, a simulation such as that in Figure D but with continuous exposure
to O2 predicts a short lifetime of ∼10 min.The two H2 oxidation reaction layers in Figure B (top panel) have the same
size, equal to the size of the unique reaction layer under anaerobic
conditions (Figure A, top panel). Therefore, the transition between the thicker and
thinner regime VII occurs for a film thickness that is twice that
of the anaerobic reaction layer (eq and eq S6.44)Numerical application using
the parameter values in Table S1 gives = 3.25 μm
for the transition between
regimes VIIa and VIIb. This value is just below the thickness of the
film of Figure C,
suggesting that the latter is actually in regime VIIb; however, the
progression of O2 inside the film rapidly makes the two
catalytic regions collapse so that the profiles in Figure B are compatible with the “thinnest
films” behavior in which protection is not sustained (VIIa),
as indeed demonstrated by the fast decay of the catalytic current
observed upon exposure to O2 (Figure C). For comparison, a slightly thicker film
(4.5 μm, Figure S2A), shows a clear
regime VIIb behavior (experimental catalytic current unaffected by
O2), which supports the value of 3.25 μm as the transition
between regimes VIIa and VIIb.
Additional Protection Mechanism
Operational in the Thinnest
Films (VIIa, Figures D and 6)
The inactivation of NiFe
hydrogenase by O2 is mostly reversible: It leads to a mixture
of inactive states that can be reactivated by reduction.[23] However, the reaction with O2 is
strongly dependent on the side chain of the position 74 residue (Figure A),[24,25] and, in particular, replacing valine 74 with cysteine accelerates
the reactivation of the oxidized enzyme.[16,24,26] Here we observe that the V74C mutation abolishes
the O2 sensitivity in the very thin hydrogenase film: Figure D shows that the
current obtained with a very thin film (3.2 μm) incorporating
the V74C hydrogenase mutant reaches a steady-state value under 5%
O2 instead of quickly decreasing, as observed for the WT
enzyme in Figure C.The experimental behavior is simply accounted
for by the model by a single change: setting a nonzero value of the
rate of reactivation of the enzyme by the reduced viologen (whereas kr = 0 in the simulations in Figures –5, all other parameters being the same). This reaction is indicated
by the label (2) in Figures D and 1F. The concentration profiles
in Figure B reach a true steady state, implying that the protection
can theoretically be effective forever (compared with a stability
of minutes for the corresponding film incorporating the WT enzyme, Figure C). Stabilization
is possible because as the front of the inactive enzyme moves in,
the concentration of O2 at the front decreases, whereas
the concentration of the reduced mediator remains the same. Thus there
is an O2 penetration depth for which the inactivation of
active enzymes by O2 is exactly balanced by the reactivation
of inactive enzymes.Effect of the reactivation of the enzyme by reduced viologen
on
the behavior of the thin film in regime VIIa, as observed in Figure D. (A) Anaerobic
and (B) aerobic dimensionless simulated concentration profiles within
the viologen-modified films embedding O2-resistant site-directed
mutant (V74C) hydrogenase, catalyzing H2 oxidation (bottom
panels). The black arrow illustrates the rate of progress of the front
of the inactive enzyme. The local rate of consumption of H2 (gray) and O2 (red) was obtained from the second derivative
of the concentration profile of each species (top panels); the horizontal
dotted lines mark Y = 0. The dimensionless distance
to the electrode ξ is x/. (C)
Change in simulated current divided
by the value under anaerobic conditions, j/j0, against τ. (D) Simulated position of
the front of the inactive enzyme ξf against dimensionless time τ. (E) Dependence of the normalized
position of the front of the inactive enzyme, ξf,
and (F) the aerobic current, j/j0, as a function of the dimensionless rate of reactivation kr/ki for various
values of the dimensionless thickness, κ; see SI Section S6.5. The black dot indicates the situation in Figure D. Calculations were
for the values of the parameters in Table S2.Figure E shows
the position of the stationary front of an inactive enzyme, ξf, as a function of the ratio of the rate constants of reactivation
over inactivation for various values of the film thickness (all in
dimensionless forms; see SI Section S6.5). The greater the kr/ki, the smaller the O2 penetration depth (ξf is closer to 1). Increasing the film thickness (κ)
decreases the value of kr/ki that is necessary to stabilize a certain value of ξf. The exact value of κ matters very much: Increasing
κ from 5.5 to 7.5, that is, <30%, decreases the value of kr/ki that stabilizes
a given ξf (here ξf = 0.6, horizontal
gray dashed line in Figure E) by more than two orders of magnitude. The curves in Figure E all end vertically
below a certain value of kr/ki, which strongly depends on the film thickness: This
is the minimum value of kr/ki that affords long-lasting protection. Figure F shows the steady-state value
of j/j0 corresponding to the penetration
depth of Figure E.
It increases with both κ and kr/ki; if kr/ki, is large enough that the film is protected,
then the steady-state current is nearly independent of kr/ki. The black circle in Figure E marks the value
predicted for the experiment shown in Figure D. Note the close agreement between the exact
value of j/j0 (0.86 in Figures C) and the value
approximated here (0.965, marked by a dot in Figure F).Control experiments where we embedded
the V74C mutant in thicker
films are shown in Figure S1. In regimes
VIIb and III, the current responses for the wild-type hydrogenase
and V74C mutant are identical (Figures A,B and Figure S1, respectively).
This confirms that the protection is primarily defined by the O2 reduction reaction catalyzed by the viologen in these regimes.
Nevertheless, the faster reactivation rate of V74C leads to a steady-state
position of the front of the inactive enzyme (Figure S1, row 7) because a balance between reactivation and
deactivation is reached, like for the thin films of V74C hydrogenase
in regime VIIa (Figure D).
Discussion
The experimental and theoretical data presented
here describe a
novel protection regime for O2-sensitive catalysts in thin
films (<6 μm) consisting of cross-linked viologen-modified
dendrimers. It was previously reported that protection could occur
only in thick films (>100 μm) in which only a tiny fraction
of the catalyst (e.g., ∼0.3% for a thickness of 100 μm, Figure E) contributed to
the current generation. Here we demonstrate that not only are O2-sensitive catalysts protected from damage in thin redox films
with a thickness of just 6 μm, but also, remarkably, the protection
is even more robust than that reported for thick films. Indeed, in
thick films (regime III), the current drops significantly after exposure
to O2 (Figure A). In thin films (VIIb), the catalytic current is virtually
unaffected by the exposure to O2, and the protection remains
long-lasting (Figures B and 4). Thinner films (3.5 μm, regime
VIIa) do not resist O2 (Figures C and 5) unless an
additional protection mechanism is operational to provide long-term
protection (Figures D and 6).The change in catalytic current
over time (or the absence thereof)
when the hydrogenase/polymer film is exposed to O2 (Figure ) reveals the extent
of the protection in each case considered, but the underlying protection
mechanism cannot be deduced from the electrochemical response alone.
Therefore, we used a reaction diffusion model to predict the time-resolved
concentration gradients and positions of the catalytic layers inside
the film; the behavior of the system depends on the values of parameters
that could all be independently determined. The model succeeds in
predicting the dependence of current on the O2 and H2 concentration as well as the transition between the two newly
identified regimes, namely, VIIa and VIIb.Despite different
current responses between regimes III and VIIb,
the protection can be explained by the exact same mechanism involving
the viologen-catalyzed O2 reduction close to the outer
film boundary, which balances the inward flux of O2. The
condition for efficient protection is that the two catalytic layers
for H2 oxidation remain spatially separated to avoid any
competition for electrons between the process for current generation
and the process for protection. The reason for the peculiar behavior
in regime VIIb (the absence of the effect of O2 on the
current) is that in thin films the concentration of H2 remains
well above the Michaelis constant, even if it is slightly depleted
as a result of O2 consumption. The lifetime of the film
is defined by two contributions, namely, the initial rate of enzyme
deactivation at the film/solution interface just after the exposure
to O2 and the rate of the subsequent progression of the
front of the inactive enzyme within the film. Whereas the duration
of the former depends on the kinetic constant for catalyst inactivation, ki (eq S6.70), the
latter depends only on the parameters that define the film properties
(eq ). In particular,
the lifetime of the film strongly depends on the viologen concentration
and the apparent diffusion coefficient of the electron (AΣ and DA). With the
system made of viologen dendrimers described herein, the value of
the product DA, which
defines the progress of the front
of the inactive enzyme (eq ), is about five times larger than that for the previously
reported redox matrices.[11]Equation and Equation S6.73 also show that the lifetime of the film scales exponentially
with its thickness. The model predicts that the lifetime of a 6 μm
film made of these viologen-modified dendrimers is 1 year (Figures S11 and S12); a further increase in film
thickness by just 2 μm theoretically leads to a lifetime of
22 000 years. These values are well beyond the intrinsic anaerobic
stability of hydrogenase, with a half life of 6 weeks,[10] or of the matrix itself, whose lifetime is limited
by the H2O2 generation that degrades the viologen
moieties.[27]Importantly, although
the film lifetime is proportional to the
reciprocal of the rate constant of the inactivation of the catalyst
by O2 (ki), this effect can
easily be compensated by adjusting the film parameters because the
latter contribute to the exponential component defining the lifetime
in eq S6.73. For instance, an eight order
of magnitude increase in inactivation rate can be compensated by just
a 4 μm increase in film thickness.Overall, the very thin
films are particularly advantageous because
the fraction of catalyst contributing to current is enhanced by two
orders of magnitude (up to half of the catalyst load in regime VIIb),
the current output is maximal (owing to fast mass transport of H2) and immune to O2, and the lifetime remains well
above that required for real-world applications.The minimal
thickness that affords long-term protection according
to the mechanism described above defines the boundary between regimes
VIIa and VIIb, where the two catalytic layers for H2 oxidation
merge (eq ), but we
also demonstrated that the redox matrix can be used to induce reactivation,
which leads to the prediction of everlasting protection, even in the
thinnest films (3.2 μm thick, regimes VIIa). The reductive reactivation
of hydrogenase occurs for hydrogenases either undergoing direct electron
transfer with electrodes[24,28,29] or interfaced by redox films,[15,30] but these previous
reports suggested that the electrons needed for reactivation originated
from the electrode. Such protection was effective only at a low electrode
potential[15] because the rate of reactivation
decreases exponentially as the electrode potential increases.[29] High electrode potentials, which do occur in
fuel cells under anode-limiting conditions, resulted in complete and
irreversible fuel cell shutdown even when using the most resistant
hydrogenases.[31] In contrast, we demonstrate
here that in the redox-active films the electrons used for reactivation
are exclusively generated from the H2 oxidation catalyzed
by an active hydrogenase in the vicinity of the layer of the inactive
enzyme. This matrix-triggered reactivation is analogous to biological
pathways that enable the reactivation of hydrogenase through their
neighbors via electron transfer.[32,33] With a mechanism
that is independent of the electrode as an electron source, reactivation
becomes possible regardless of the operating conditions of the fuel
cell and thus serves as a built-in safeguard against uncontrolled
oxidative shutdown. Films operating in regime VIIb and embedding enzymes
that can reductively reactivate are particularly advantageous because
the protection from O2 theoretically lasts forever and
the anaerobic currents are fully immune to O2.
Conclusions
We experimentally demonstrated and theoretically elucidated the
mechanism of protection of catalysts in redox films in the complete
range of catalytic regimes related to the film thicknesses relevant
for applications. Two major and unexpected findings could make the
research community rethink catalyst use and design. First, micrometer-thick
films are sufficient to efficiently protect fragile catalysts such
as hydrogenase, enabling their use in energy-converting devices without
compromising the current generation efficiency or immobilizing large
amounts of unused catalyst. The only requirement is that the matrix
efficiently diverts electrons from the catalysts for the reduction
of O2. Because even a large inactivation kinetic constant
of the catalysts can be easily counterbalanced by minor changes in
parameters defining the film properties (in particular, its thickness),
highly O2-sensitive catalysts can now be considered for
applications without the need to decrease their inactivation rate.
Second, the matrix can further enhance protection from O2 for an infinite time period by using a fraction of the electrons
diverted from H2 oxidation (rather than from the electrode)
to reactivate the catalyst and thus stop the progression of the layer
of the inactive catalyst. This creates novel opportunities to utilize
reactivation kinetics, even under the uncontrolled and oxidative conditions
encountered in operating fuel cells. The quantitative description
of the requirements in terms of the catalyst reactivation kinetics
and the film properties presented here will guide the future development
of biological or bioinspired catalysts that reductively reactivate,
as indeed recently observed in synthetic mimics of the NiFe hydrogenase
active site,[34] to achieve robust operation,
even under the harsh oxidative conditions of H2/O2 fuel cells and other energy-converting devices.
Authors: Wangkheimayum Marjit Singh; Teera Baine; Shotaro Kudo; Shiliang Tian; Xuan Anh N Ma; Hongyu Zhou; Nathan J DeYonker; Truc Chi Pham; John C Bollinger; Daniel L Baker; Bing Yan; Charles Edwin Webster; Xuan Zhao Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Anne Volbeda; Lydie Martin; Pierre-Pol Liebgott; Antonio L De Lacey; Juan C Fontecilla-Camps Journal: Metallomics Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.526
Authors: Alaa Alsheikh Oughli; Felipe Conzuelo; Martin Winkler; Thomas Happe; Wolfgang Lubitz; Wolfgang Schuhmann; Olaf Rüdiger; Nicolas Plumeré Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Alan Le Goff; Vincent Artero; Bruno Jousselme; Phong Dinh Tran; Nicolas Guillet; Romain Métayé; Aziz Fihri; Serge Palacin; Marc Fontecave Journal: Science Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: James A Cracknell; Annemarie F Wait; Oliver Lenz; Bärbel Friedrich; Fraser A Armstrong Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Alaa A Oughli; Adrian Ruff; Nilusha Priyadarshani Boralugodage; Patricia Rodríguez-Maciá; Nicolas Plumeré; Wolfgang Lubitz; Wendy J Shaw; Wolfgang Schuhmann; Olaf Rüdiger Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Sven T Stripp; Benjamin R Duffus; Vincent Fourmond; Christophe Léger; Silke Leimkühler; Shun Hirota; Yilin Hu; Andrew Jasniewski; Hideaki Ogata; Markus W Ribbe Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 72.087
Authors: Julian Szczesny; James A Birrell; Felipe Conzuelo; Wolfgang Lubitz; Adrian Ruff; Wolfgang Schuhmann Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Steffen Hardt; Stefanie Stapf; Dawit T Filmon; James A Birrell; Olaf Rüdiger; Vincent Fourmond; Christophe Léger; Nicolas Plumeré Journal: Nat Catal Date: 2021-03-18
Authors: Adrian Ruff; Julian Szczesny; Maria Vega; Sonia Zacarias; Pedro M Matias; Sébastien Gounel; Nicolas Mano; Inês A C Pereira; Wolfgang Schuhmann Journal: ChemSusChem Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 8.928
Authors: Esther Edwardes Moore; Samuel J Cobb; Ana Margarida Coito; Ana Rita Oliveira; Inês A C Pereira; Erwin Reisner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 12.779