Literature DB >> 24866091

Novel ureteroscopic navigation system with a magnetic tracking device: a preliminary ex vivo evaluation.

Kenji Yoshida1, Gen Kawa, Hisanori Taniguchi, Takaaki Inoue, Takao Mishima, Masaaki Yanishi, Motohiko Sugi, Hidefumi Kinoshita, Tadashi Matsuda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Examination of the pyelocaliceal system using a flexible ureteroscope necessitates accurate orientation of the tip of the instrument. This study assessed the use of a novel real-time ureteroscopic navigation system in a pyelocaliceal phantom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The navigation system used a magnetic tracking device to determine the position of the ureteroscope in a pyelocaliceal phantom and displayed the position of the endoscope on a three-dimensional image that could be rotated. Twenty-eight urologists were divided into group A and group B (seven novice surgeons and seven experienced surgeons in each group). All participants were asked to examine the phantom and identify the positions of three designated calices, without the navigation system (Task 1) and with the navigation system (Task 2). In group A, participants performed Task 1 followed by Task 2. In group B, participants performed Task 2 followed by Task 1. The accuracy rate (AR) of identifying the calices, migration length (ML) of the tip of the ureteroscope, and time (T) taken to complete the task were recorded. The results were compared between Task 1 and Task 2, and between novice and experienced surgeons.
RESULTS: The AR for Task 2 was 100% in both group A and group B. The AR was significantly lower in Task 1 than in Task 2 for both novice and experienced surgeons in both groups (group A: novice P=0.016, experienced P=0.034; group B: novice P=0.015, experienced P=0.015; Wilcoxon test). In Group A, T was significantly longer in Task 1 than in Task 2 for experienced surgeons. There were no significant differences in ML or T between novice and experienced surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS: Our novel ureteroscopic navigation system improved the accuracy of ureteroscopic maneuvers. Further development of this system for use in clinical ureteroscopic procedures is planned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24866091      PMCID: PMC4146388          DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  12 in total

1.  A novel approach to endourological training: training at the Surgical Skills Center.

Authors:  E D Matsumoto; S J Hamstra; S B Radomski; M D Cusimano
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Current progress on augmented reality visualization in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Masahiko Nakamoto; Osamu Ukimura; Kenneth Faber; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Update on flexible ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Maurizio Buscarini; Michael Conlin
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Training in ureteroscopy: a critical appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Stavros Gravas; M Pilar Laguna; Olivier Traxer; Glenn M Preminger; Jean de la Rosette
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Newly developed electromagnetic tracked flexible neuroendoscope.

Authors:  Hideki Atsumi; Mitsunori Matsumae; Akihiro Hirayama; Kenichiro Sato; Hideaki Shigematsu; Go Inoue; Jun Nishiyama; Michitsura Yoshiyama; Jiro Tominaga
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 6.  OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images.

Authors:  Antoine Rosset; Luca Spadola; Osman Ratib
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Validation of a bench model for endoscopic surgery in the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Marianne Brehmer; David Tolley
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  A new world revealed: early experience with digital ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Mitchell R Humphreys; Nicole L Miller; James C Williams; Andrew P Evan; Larry C Munch; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Augmented reality: a new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Preliminary in vitro and in vivo results.

Authors:  Dogu Teber; Selcuk Guven; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Mathias Baumhauer; Esref Oguz Güven; Faruk Yencilek; Ali Serdar Gözen; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice.

Authors:  George K Chow; David E Patterson; Michael L Blute; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.