Literature DB >> 12796655

Ureteroscopy: effect of technology and technique on clinical practice.

George K Chow1, David E Patterson, Michael L Blute, Joseph W Segura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Technical advances in ureteroscopy allow for more aggressive management of upper tract pathology. We evaluate to what extent clinical practice and treatment efficacy have been impacted by improvements in technology and technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1998, 176 consecutive patients underwent 182 ureteroscopic procedures at our institution. Retrospective chart review was performed. Factors such as clinical indication, pathology location, type of ureteroscope, procedure duration, procedure success, complication rate and length of stay were evaluated. Data from the 1998 cohort were compared to those obtained from a cohort of patients from 1992. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test.
RESULTS: Overall stone extraction rate was 94.4% (1992) vs 88.5% (1998) (p = 0.05). Proximal stones were treated in 13.5% (1998) vs 28.3% (1998) of cases. Distal stone extraction rate was 97.2% (1992) vs 95.1% (1998) (p = 0.43) and proximal stone extraction rate was 76.5% (1992) vs 71.9% (1998) (p = 0.73). Diagnostic inspection success rate was 98.3% (1992) vs 98.3% (1998). Use of flexible ureteroscopy was 11.5% (1992) vs 29.4% (1998). Complication rate was 12% (1992) vs 10.2% (1998) (p = 0.76). Of the cases 76.1% were outpatient in 1998 vs only 50% in 1992.
CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances in ureteroscopic technology permit more aggressive instrumentation of the upper tract as reflected in higher use of flexible ureteroscopy and more frequent attempts to manage proximal ureteral calculi. These advances have not translated into better efficacy of calculus treatment. Furthermore, our data reflect a nationwide trend toward outpatient treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12796655     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000070883.44091.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  23 in total

1.  [Ureterorenoscopy: yesterday, today, tomorrow].

Authors:  T Knoll; P Alken
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Pharmacological effect on pyeloureteric dynamics with a clinical perspective: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Helene U Jung; Poul C Frimodt-Møller; Palle J Osther; Jens Mortensen
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2006-12

Review 3.  [Technical innovations in endourological stone therapy].

Authors:  P Honeck; U Nagele; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: treatment aspects on the single-pulse level.

Authors:  Ronald Sroka; Thomas Pongratz; Gabriel Scheib; Wael Khoder; Christian G Stief; Thomas Herrmann; Udo Nagele; Markus J Bader
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Dual usage of a stone basket: Stone capture and retropulsion prevention.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Daniela Ghiculete; Robert Sowerby; Michael Ordon; Jason Y Lee; Kenneth T Pace; John R Honey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Preventing stone retropulsion during intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Osama M Elashry; Ahmad M Tawfik
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  In vitro and in vivo comparison of optics and performance of a distal sensor ureteroscope versus a standard fiberoptic ureteroscope.

Authors:  Achim Lusch; Corollos Abdelshehid; Guy Hidas; Kathryn E Osann; Zhamshid Okhunov; Elspeth McDougall; Jaime Landman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Novel ureteroscopic navigation system with a magnetic tracking device: a preliminary ex vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Kenji Yoshida; Gen Kawa; Hisanori Taniguchi; Takaaki Inoue; Takao Mishima; Masaaki Yanishi; Motohiko Sugi; Hidefumi Kinoshita; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 9.  Ureteroscopy for the management of stone disease.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Michael P Kurtz; Stephen P Dretler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Use of XenX™, the latest ureteric occlusion device with guide wire utility: results from a prospective multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Francesco Sanguedolce; Emanuele Montanari; Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Nicola Macchione; Stephan Hruby; Athanasios Papatsoris; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Luca Villa; Patrick Honeck; Olivier Traxer; Francesco Greco
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.