Sophia K Smith1, Jonathan Nicolla2, S Yousuf Zafar2. 1. Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute; and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC sophia.smith@duke.edu. 2. Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute; and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cancer treatment-related out-of-pocket costs create substantial financial distress for many patients. However, little work has been done to describe available financial resources and barriers to connecting those resources to patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, qualitative study that used semistructured interviews and focus groups with social workers and financial care counselors. Interview guides were used to elicit feedback from study participants pertaining to the types of financial problems that their patients were experiencing, the process for addressing these issues, patient assistance resources, and access barriers. RESULTS: Four interviews and two focus group sessions (n = 15) were conducted in which four themes emerged among the social work and financial care counselor samples. Participants cited (1) frustration over the lack of financial resources and increasingly stringent eligibility criteria, (2) barriers to providing assistance such as process inefficiencies, (3) limited resources to identify at- risk patients and refer them for services, and (4) inadequate insurance coverage and availability. To bridge the gap between increasing patient need and limited resources, participants suggested development of interventions designed to aid in patient screening and resource identification. CONCLUSIONS: Oncology social workers and financial care counselors reported inadequate financial resources and faced barriers to matching appropriate resources with patients in need. Limited social work resources hindered early screening for financial distress. Interventions that focus on screening for early identification of financial distress and identification of resources are needed.
PURPOSE:Cancer treatment-related out-of-pocket costs create substantial financial distress for many patients. However, little work has been done to describe available financial resources and barriers to connecting those resources to patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, qualitative study that used semistructured interviews and focus groups with social workers and financial care counselors. Interview guides were used to elicit feedback from study participants pertaining to the types of financial problems that their patients were experiencing, the process for addressing these issues, patient assistance resources, and access barriers. RESULTS: Four interviews and two focus group sessions (n = 15) were conducted in which four themes emerged among the social work and financial care counselor samples. Participants cited (1) frustration over the lack of financial resources and increasingly stringent eligibility criteria, (2) barriers to providing assistance such as process inefficiencies, (3) limited resources to identify at- risk patients and refer them for services, and (4) inadequate insurance coverage and availability. To bridge the gap between increasing patient need and limited resources, participants suggested development of interventions designed to aid in patient screening and resource identification. CONCLUSIONS: Oncology social workers and financial care counselors reported inadequate financial resources and faced barriers to matching appropriate resources with patients in need. Limited social work resources hindered early screening for financial distress. Interventions that focus on screening for early identification of financial distress and identification of resources are needed.
Authors: S Yousuf Zafar; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Deborah Schrag; Donald H Taylor; Amy M Goetzinger; Xiaoyin Zhong; Amy P Abernethy Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-02-26
Authors: Sophie Lauzier; Pascale Lévesque; Myrto Mondor; Mélanie Drolet; Douglas Coyle; Jacques Brisson; Benoît Mâsse; Louise Provencher; André Robidoux; Elizabeth Maunsell Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Patrick B Murphy; Sarah Severance; Stephanie Savage; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi; Lava R Timsina; Ben L Zarzaur Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Theresa A Hastert; Jaclyn M Kyko; Amanda R Reed; Felicity W K Harper; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Tara E Baird; Ann G Schwartz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Caitlin R Meeker; Daniel M Geynisman; Brian L Egleston; Michael J Hall; Karen Y Mechanic; Marijo Bilusic; Elizabeth R Plimack; Lainie P Martin; Margaret von Mehren; Bianca Lewis; Yu-Ning Wong Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Jennifer C Spencer; Cleo A Samuel; Donald L Rosenstein; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Michelle L Manning; Jean B Sellers; Stephanie B Wheeler Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marques S N Ng; Kai Chow Choi; Dorothy N S Chan; Cho Lee Wong; Weijie Xing; Pui Shan Ho; Cecilia Au; Mandy Chan; Man Tong; Wai Man Ling; Maggie Chan; Suzanne S S Mak; Raymond J Chan; Winnie K W So Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: S Yousuf Zafar; Rebecca B McNeil; Catherine M Thomas; Christopher S Lathan; John Z Ayanian; Dawn Provenzale Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: I-Chan Huang; Nickhill Bhakta; Tara M Brinkman; James L Klosky; Kevin R Krull; DeoKumar Srivastava; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Yu-Ning Wong; Mark D Schluchter; Terrance L Albrecht; Al Bowen Benson; Joanne Buzaglo; Michael Collins; Anne Lederman Flamm; Linda Fleisher; Michael Katz; Tyler G Kinzy; Tasnuva M Liu; Sharon Manne; Seunghee Margevicius; Dawn M Miller; Suzanne M Miller; David Poole; Stephanie Raivitch; Nancy Roach; Eric Ross; Neal J Meropol Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 44.544