Literature DB >> 22942827

Patient Out-of-Pocket Payments for Oral Oncolytics: Results From a 2009 US Claims Data Analysis.

Martin L Raborn1, Elise M Pelletier, Daniel B Smith, Carolina M Reyes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oral oncolytics are an increasingly important treatment option for cancer. These agents often fall within the pharmacy benefit, with the potential for increased out-of-pocket (OOP) cost burden for patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient OOP payments for oral oncolytic therapies in US managed care plans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients age ≥ 18 years who received one of 21 oral oncolytics were identified in 2009 US claims; the first oral therapy was the index therapy. OOP payments were calculated as the allowed amount (dollar amount a health plan allows for a therapy, including member liability) minus the paid amount (dollar amount paid by a health plan). Patient characteristics were provided, and per-claim OOP payments were evaluated for each of the 21 therapies in aggregate and stratified by payer type and index therapy.
RESULTS: A total of 6,094 patients who received at least one oral oncolytic therapy were identified. Mean age was 53 years; 54% were women; 77% had a commercial payer; prevalent cancer diagnoses included breast, colorectal, glioblastoma, and lung. Mean OOP payments were highest for dasatinib ($527; median, $36) and lowest for cyclophosphamide ($15; median, $10). Medicare Risk patients had higher mean OOP payments for most therapies compared with commercial, Medicaid, and self-insured patients.
CONCLUSION: Among 21 oral oncolytics, average OOP cost ranged from $15 to > $500. These results confirm previous findings showing OOP payments differing widely among oral oncolytic options. As cost for therapy becomes a greater part of treatment decisions, an understanding of patient OOP cost will be critical in informing choices.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22942827      PMCID: PMC3348605          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  13 in total

Review 1.  The burden of illness of cancer: economic cost and quality of life.

Authors:  M L Brown; J Lipscomb; C Snyder
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Post hoc economic analysis of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of advanced metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  B E Hillner; S Agarwala; M R Middleton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Compliance with oral drug therapy in patients with hematologic malignancy.

Authors:  A M Levine; J L Richardson; G Marks; K Chan; J Graham; J N Selser; C Kishbaugh; D R Shelton; C A Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Adherence to therapy with oral antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Jerry Avorn; Philip S Wang; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020.

Authors:  Angela B Mariotto; K Robin Yabroff; Yongwu Shao; Eric J Feuer; Martin L Brown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Patient and plan characteristics affecting abandonment of oral oncolytic prescriptions.

Authors:  Sonya Blesser Streeter; Lee Schwartzberg; Nadia Husain; Michael Johnsrud
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 7.  Patient adherence and persistence with oral anticancer treatment.

Authors:  Kathryn Ruddy; Erica Mayer; Ann Partridge
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Patient noncompliance with self-administered chemotherapy.

Authors:  A H Lebovits; J J Strain; S J Schleifer; J S Tanaka; S Bhardwaj; M R Messe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The impact of serious illness on patients' families. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.

Authors:  K E Covinsky; L Goldman; E F Cook; R Oye; N Desbiens; D Reding; W Fulkerson; A F Connors; J Lynn; R S Phillips
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cost implications of IV versus oral anti-angiogenesis therapies in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: retrospective claims database analysis.

Authors:  Mei Sheng Duh; Ellison Dial; Toni K Choueiri; Andree-Anne Fournier; Lucia Antras; Douglas Rodermund; Maureen P Neary; William K Oh
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.580

View more
  9 in total

1.  Bridging the gap between financial distress and available resources for patients with cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sophia K Smith; Jonathan Nicolla; S Yousuf Zafar
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Trends in the Cost and Use of Targeted Cancer Therapies for the Privately Insured Nonelderly: 2001 to 2011.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Fabrice Smieliauskas; Daniel M Geynisman; Ronan J Kelly; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  The Out-of-Pocket Cost Burden of Cancer Care-A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicolas Iragorri; Claire de Oliveira; Natalie Fitzgerald; Beverley Essue
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Financial toxicity, Part I: a new name for a growing problem.

Authors:  S Yousuf Zafar; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  Treatment Patterns, Survival, and Healthcare Costs of Patients with Malignant Gliomas in a Large US Commercially Insured Population.

Authors:  Saurabh Ray; Machaon M Bonafede; Nimish A Mohile
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2014-05

6.  Oral Oncology Parity Laws, Medication Use, and Out-of-Pocket Spending for Patients With Blood Cancers.

Authors:  Stacie B Dusetzina; Haiden A Huskamp; Shelley A Jazowski; Aaron N Winn; William A Wood; Adam Olszewski; Ethan Basch; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications: Evolving Interprofessional Roles and Pharmacist Workforce Considerations.

Authors:  Gennaro A Paolella; Andrew D Boyd; Scott M Wirth; Sandra Cuellar; Neeta K Venepalli; Stephanie Y Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-08

8.  Perceptions of Health-Care Workers of the Cost and Safety of Oral Oncolytic Agents for Patients: A Survey.

Authors:  Madeline Tompkinson; Kelly Fine; Dean Gruber; Ivo Abraham; Ali McBride
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 9.  Linking Intermediate to Final "Real-World" Outcomes: Is Financial Toxicity a Reliable Predictor of Poorer Outcomes in Cancer?

Authors:  Christopher J Longo
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.