Literature DB >> 24863361

Sequential combination of karyotyping and RNA-sequencing in the search for cancer-specific fusion genes.

Ioannis Panagopoulos1, Jim Thorsen2, Ludmila Gorunova2, Francesca Micci2, Sverre Heim2.   

Abstract

Cancer-specific fusion genes are often caused by cytogenetically visible chromosomal rearrangements such as translocations, inversions, deletions or insertions, they can be the targets of molecular therapy, they play a key role in the accurate diagnosis and classification of neoplasms, and they are of prognostic impact. The identification of novel fusion genes in various neoplasms therefore not only has obvious research importance, but is also potentially of major clinical significance. The "traditional" methodology to detect them began with cytogenetic analysis to find the chromosomal rearrangement, followed by utilization of fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques to find the probe which spans the chromosomal breakpoint, and finally molecular cloning to localize the breakpoint more precisely and identify the genes fused by the chromosomal rearrangement. Although laborious, the above-mentioned sequential approach is robust and reliable and a number of fusion genes have been cloned by such means. Next generation sequencing (NGS), mainly RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), has opened up new possibilities to detect fusion genes even when cytogenetic aberrations are cryptic or information about them is unknown. However, NGS suffers from the shortcoming of identifying as "fusion genes" also many technical, biological and, perhaps in particular, clinical "false positives," thus making the assessment of which fusions are important and which are noise extremely difficult. The best way to overcome this risk of information overflow is, whenever reliable cytogenetic information is at hand, to compare karyotyping and sequencing data and concentrate exclusively on those suggested fusion genes that are found in chromosomal breakpoints. This article is part of a Directed Issue entitled: Rare Cancers.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer-specific fusion genes; Karyotyping; RNA-sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24863361     DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol        ISSN: 1357-2725            Impact factor:   5.085


  8 in total

1.  Single base substitution mutational signatures in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia based on whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Rebeqa Gunnarsson; Minjun Yang; Linda Olsson-Arvidsson; Andrea Biloglav; Mikael Behrendtz; Anders Castor; Kajsa Paulsson; Bertil Johansson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  Hypothesis: Artifacts, Including Spurious Chimeric RNAs with a Short Homologous Sequence, Caused by Consecutive Reverse Transcriptions and Endogenous Random Primers.

Authors:  Zhiyu Peng; Chengfu Yuan; Lucas Zellmer; Siqi Liu; Ningzhi Xu; D Joshua Liao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Novel ZEB2-BCL11B Fusion Gene Identified by RNA-Sequencing in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with t(2;14)(q22;q32).

Authors:  Synne Torkildsen; Ludmila Gorunova; Klaus Beiske; Geir E Tjønnfjord; Sverre Heim; Ioannis Panagopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Gene fusions AHRR-NCOA2, NCOA2-ETV4, ETV4-AHRR, P4HA2-TBCK, and TBCK-P4HA2 resulting from the translocations t(5;8;17)(p15;q13;q21) and t(4;5)(q24;q31) in a soft tissue angiofibroma.

Authors:  Ioannis Panagopoulos; Ludmila Gorunova; Trond Viset; Sverre Heim
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  FAM53B truncation caused by t(10;19)(q26;q13) chromosome translocation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Ioannis Panagopoulos; Ludmila Gorunova; Synne Torkildsen; Anne Tierens; Sverre Heim; Francesca Micci
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Recurrent Fusion Genes in Leukemia: An Attractive Target for Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Yuhui Wang; Nan Wu; Duo Liu; Yan Jin
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.236

7.  Cytogenetic and molecular profile of endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Authors:  Francesca Micci; Ludmila Gorunova; Antonio Agostini; Lene E Johannessen; Marta Brunetti; Ben Davidson; Sverre Heim; Ioannis Panagopoulos
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  RNA-sequencing identifies novel GREB1-NCOA2 fusion gene in a uterine sarcoma with the chromosomal translocation t(2;8)(p25;q13).

Authors:  Marta Brunetti; Ioannis Panagopoulos; Ludmila Gorunova; Ben Davidson; Sverre Heim; Francesca Micci
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.006

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.