Literature DB >> 33864028

Single base substitution mutational signatures in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia based on whole genome sequencing.

Rebeqa Gunnarsson1, Minjun Yang2, Linda Olsson-Arvidsson2,3, Andrea Biloglav2, Mikael Behrendtz4, Anders Castor5, Kajsa Paulsson2, Bertil Johansson2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33864028      PMCID: PMC8102186          DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01242-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


× No keyword cloud information.

To the Editor:

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of neoplasms not only offers a comprehensive genome-wide detection of gene fusions/other structural variants (SVs), gene mutations, and copy number abnormalities (CNAs) but also provides information on acquired mutational profiles, including localized hypermutations (kataegis) and single base substitution (SBS) mutational signatures. The latter are recurring trinucleotide patterns of somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and their flanking nucleotides that are, in some instances, associated with the etiology or pathogenesis of neoplastic disorders, for example C>T transitions in UV-associated melanoma, C>A transversions in smoking-induced lung cancer, and C>T transitions and C>G transversions caused by overactive APOBEC enzymes [1, 2]. In addition, WGS allows detection of variants in non-coding regulatory elements (REs), such as enhancers and promoters, resulting in de-regulated gene transcription [3]. However, the few WGS studies of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) reported to date have not ascertained SBS mutational signatures or variants in REs [4-6]. We performed WGS on 20 pediatric AML cases (Supplementary Information and Supplementary Fig. S1), focusing on SBS profiles, variants in REs, and novel gene fusions and mutations. Apart from confirming all gene fusions detected in clinical routine, the SV analysis revealed three novel in-frame fusions: PLEKHA5-ADAMTS20, RAB11FIP2-NEURL4, and TCF3-HOXB9 (Supplementary Information, Supplementary Tables S1 and S2, and Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3). The TCF3-HOXB9 fusion recombines two transcription factor genes that are important for differentiation, such as lymphopoiesis, and proliferation and that are expressed in bone marrow (BM) and lymph nodes (LNs) (Supplementary Table S2). In addition, TCF3 is a partner in several other fusion genes in, e.g., acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The PLEKHA5-ADAMTS20 fusion involves two genes that are often fused to other genes in, mainly, epithelial malignancies but that are also normally expressed in BM and LNs. (Supplementary Table S2). RAB11FIP2-NEURL4 rearranges RAB11FIP2, expressed in BM and LNs, with the mitotic gene NEURL4, which is fused to, for example, MSI2 in malignant melanoma (supplementary Table 2). An XPO1-TNRC18 fusion, previously reported in a single case of ALL [7], was also identified. In total, 13 (65%) of the 20 AMLs harbored WGS-identified fusion genes (Supplementary Table S1). Although we cannot exclude the possibility that the novel fusions were merely byproducts of the genetic instability present in many tumor types—such “passenger fusions” are commonly identified by various types of massively parallel sequencing [8]—we consider this unlikely. First, all gene partners in the novel fusions, except RAB11FIP2, have previously been reported to be rearranged with other genes in human malignancies (Supplementary Table S2; https://mitelmandatabase.isb-cgc.org/); this increases the likelihood that they are pathogenetically important. Second, the fact that the fusion genes were identified by WGS clearly shows that they existed on the DNA level and, hence, were not transcription-induced [8, 9]. A total of 34 CNAs (24 losses and 10 gains; median 1.5 CNAs/case) and two uniparental isodisomies were detected; none of the cases displayed chromothripsis (Supplementary Information and Supplementary Table S3). The frequencies of imbalances did not differ between cases with or without (w/wo) fusion genes (P = 0.3). Of the 10 920 somatic variants identified (Supplementary Table S1), 10,492 (96%) were SNVs and 428 (4%) small insertions/deletions (indels). There were between 73 and 1 198 SNVs/indels per case (median 502/case), corresponding to 0.024-0.386 SNVs/indels per Mb. This low frequency of SNVs/indels agrees well with a previous study showing that pediatric AMLs harbor fewer mutations than other childhood cancers [10]. Furthermore, the rainfall plot analyses revealed kataegic regions in only two cases (Supplementary Fig. S4). The most common type of SNV was a C>T transition (48%), followed by C>A transversions (17%), T>C transitions (15%), T>G (7%), T>A (7%), and C>G (6%) transversions (Fig. 1). All transitions and transversions, except C>A, increased significantly with age (Supplementary Fig. S5), as expected considering that many acquired SNVs are known to occur in a clockwise manner [11]. Neither the total mutational burden nor the different types of substitution differed significantly between cases w/wo fusion genes (data not shown).
Fig. 1

Overview of the transition and transversion types and the single base substitution (SBS) mutational signatures in the pediatric acute myeloid leukemias cases.

Left panel: the distribution of the six different transition and transversion types per case. Middle panel: heat map showing the distribution of the SBS signatures in each case. Right panel: The frequencies of the five overall most common signatures (SBS1, SBS18, SBS32, SBS37, and SBS39) per case.

Overview of the transition and transversion types and the single base substitution (SBS) mutational signatures in the pediatric acute myeloid leukemias cases.

Left panel: the distribution of the six different transition and transversion types per case. Middle panel: heat map showing the distribution of the SBS signatures in each case. Right panel: The frequencies of the five overall most common signatures (SBS1, SBS18, SBS32, SBS37, and SBS39) per case. The SBS mutational signature analysis revealed that signature 1 (SBS1) was the most common one, detected in all 20 AMLs with relative contributions of 15–34% per case (median 25%; Fig. 1). It is associated with a predominance of C>T transitions resulting from endogenous, spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosines and increasing by age [1]. The second most frequent signature was SBS18, found in 15 of the AMLs (median relative contribution of 8.2%), which is characterized by C>A transversions and possibly associated with damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic/signatures/SBS/SBS18.tt). The SBS39, SBS37, and SBS32 signatures were detected in 18, 15, and 13 of the cases, with median values of relative contributions of 4.0%, 3.9%, and 3.2%, respectively. The etiologies of SBS37 and SBS39 are unknown, whereas SBS32 has been associated with prior treatment with azathioprine (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic/signatures/SBS). In the hierarchical cluster analysis of the above-mentioned signatures, the RUNX1-RUNXT1-positive cases clustered together in a separate branch, most likely because of the high proportions of SBS18 signatures/C>A transversions in these cases (Supplementary Fig. S6). Interestingly, frequent C>A transversions in RUNX1-RUNXT1-positive cases have previously been reported [4] and, although SBS mutational profiling was not performed in that study, it supports the association between C>A transversions, SBS18, and t(8;21) AML identified herein. In order to validate the association between RUNX1-RUNX1T1, C>A transversions, and SBS18, we utilized the TCGA dataset [12]; however, it should be stressed that this is based on whole exome sequencing data and hence is much less informative than WGS data with regard to number of SNVs. First, we compared the frequencies of the different SBS types in RUNX1-RUNX1T1-positive and -negative cases in our cohort and in the TCGA dataset. As seen in Supplementary Table S4, a relatively high frequency of C>A transversions was observed in the RUNX1-RUNXT1-positive cases also in the TCGA cohort. Furthermore, the SBS18 signature was observed in the RUNX1-RUNX1T1-positive group in the TCGA dataset; in contrast, no SBS18 signature was identified in the RUNX1-RUNX1T1-negative subgroups (Supplementary Table S5). Although based on whole exome sequencing data, the TCGA cohort thus provides some support for the association between C>A transversions, SBS18, and t(8;21) in AML. Comparing the SNVs/indels found at diagnosis and relapse of cases 1 and 2 revealed that 51% (case 1) and 33% (case 2) of the SNVs/indels at relapse were identical to those detected at diagnosis; the other SNVs/indels were either novel or lost at relapse (Supplementary Fig. S7). Interestingly, the SBS mutational signatures were similar at diagnosis and relapse (data no shown), showing that the induction and consolidation therapies did not result in different signatures at relapse. Of the 10,920 SNVs/indels, 123 (1.1%) occurred within coding genes (Supplementary Table S6) and 110 of these could be confirmed by deep sequencing, whole exome sequencing, or Sanger sequencing. Eighty-nine of the verified SNVs/indels in 84 different genes were considered pathogenic, either by default by being truncating or by being classified as such by SIFT and/or PolyPhen. Gene ontology data on molecular functions were available for 43 of the 84 genes: the most frequent functions were transcriptional regulation (67%) and metal ion binding (67%) (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. S8). Apart from genes previously reported to be mutated in pediatric AML, e.g., DNMT3A, GATA2, JAK3, NCOR1, and NOTCH1 [4, 13], we identified pathogenic SNVs/indels in 33 genes (Supplementary Table S6) previously not implicated in AML, such as RASL11A (RAS signaling), ATPB5 (mitochondrial metabolism), and ASCC3, MACF1, USF2, ZFAT, and ZNF251 (transcriptional regulation).
Fig. 2

Overview of gene ontology (GO)-annotated molecular functions of the 43 genes with pathogenic variants.

A–N indicate different GO functions: A metal ion binding; B nucleotide binding; C metal ion and nucleotide binding; D chromatin binding; E metal ion and chromatin binding; F chromatin and polymerase II activating transcription factor binding; G metal ion, chromatin/DNA binding, and transcription activator; H chromatin/DNA binding and transcription activator; I metal ion, DNA binding, and transcription activator; J metal ion, DNA and RNA polymerase II activating transcription factor binding, and transcription activator; K metal ion binding and helicase activity; L helicase activity; M metal ion binding and cytoskeletal protein binding; N cytoskeletal protein binding.

Overview of gene ontology (GO)-annotated molecular functions of the 43 genes with pathogenic variants.

A–N indicate different GO functions: A metal ion binding; B nucleotide binding; C metal ion and nucleotide binding; D chromatin binding; E metal ion and chromatin binding; F chromatin and polymerase II activating transcription factor binding; G metal ion, chromatin/DNA binding, and transcription activator; H chromatin/DNA binding and transcription activator; I metal ion, DNA binding, and transcription activator; J metal ion, DNA and RNA polymerase II activating transcription factor binding, and transcription activator; K metal ion binding and helicase activity; L helicase activity; M metal ion binding and cytoskeletal protein binding; N cytoskeletal protein binding. The analysis of the 10,920 somatic SNVs/indels revealed that 133 (1.2%) of them occurred in REs, mainly enhancers (41%) and promoters (26%) (Supplementary Information and Supplementary Table S7). The potential targets of the RE variants comprised 656 targets—506 (77%) genes and 150 (23%) ncRNAs. Only six genes and one ncRNA were recurrently targeted (Supplementary Table S7), suggesting that the RE variants did not affect specific genes/pathways. In conclusion, the present WGS analysis of pediatric AML identified both known and novel fusion genes (PLEKHA5-ADAMTS20, RAB11FIP2-NEURL4, and TCF3-HOXB9) and revealed relatively few CNAs and SNAs/indels as compared with other malignancies. Furthermore, regions with kataegis were rare and there were no signs of chromothripsis. Thus, childhood AML is characterized by a low degree of genomic complexity and mutational burden. Of the acquired variants detected, only a minority targeted REs (~1%) and coding genes (~1%). However, a large proportion (39%) of the coding genes had previously not been implicated in AML. Although fusion genes are considered strong driver mutations, requiring few additional hits for generating overt leukemia [14], this was not reflected by differences in CNAs, SNVs/indels, overall genomic complexity, functions of the mutated genes, or SBS mutational signatures between fusion-positive and -negative cases. However, RUNX1-RUNXT1-positive cases were for the first time associated with a higher prevalence of the ROS-associated SBS18 signature, likely due to the high frequency of C>A transversions in this AML subtype. Although the correlation between SBS18 and t(8;21) should be considered preliminary—additional studies are needed to confirm or refute this—the present finding indicates that DNA damage caused by ROS [14, 15] may be of particular importance in RUNX1-RUNXT1-positive AML. Supplemental Material Supplemental Information
  15 in total

Review 1.  The emerging complexity of gene fusions in cancer.

Authors:  Fredrik Mertens; Bertil Johansson; Thoas Fioretos; Felix Mitelman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  The landscape of somatic mutations in Down syndrome-related myeloid disorders.

Authors:  Kenichi Yoshida; Tsutomu Toki; Yusuke Okuno; Rika Kanezaki; Yuichi Shiraishi; Aiko Sato-Otsubo; Masashi Sanada; Myoung-ja Park; Kiminori Terui; Hiromichi Suzuki; Ayana Kon; Yasunobu Nagata; Yusuke Sato; RuNan Wang; Norio Shiba; Kenichi Chiba; Hiroko Tanaka; Asahito Hama; Hideki Muramatsu; Daisuke Hasegawa; Kazuhiro Nakamura; Hirokazu Kanegane; Keiko Tsukamoto; Souichi Adachi; Kiyoshi Kawakami; Koji Kato; Ryosei Nishimura; Shai Izraeli; Yasuhide Hayashi; Satoru Miyano; Seiji Kojima; Etsuro Ito; Seishi Ogawa
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Sequential combination of karyotyping and RNA-sequencing in the search for cancer-specific fusion genes.

Authors:  Ioannis Panagopoulos; Jim Thorsen; Ludmila Gorunova; Francesca Micci; Sverre Heim
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 5.085

4.  Systematic analysis of noncoding somatic mutations and gene expression alterations across 14 tumor types.

Authors:  Nils J Fredriksson; Lars Ny; Jonas A Nilsson; Erik Larsson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Genomic analyses identify recurrent MEF2D fusions in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  Zhaohui Gu; Michelle Churchman; Kathryn Roberts; Yongjin Li; Yu Liu; Richard C Harvey; Kelly McCastlain; Shalini C Reshmi; Debbie Payne-Turner; Ilaria Iacobucci; Ying Shao; I-Ming Chen; Marcus Valentine; Deqing Pei; Karen L Mungall; Andrew J Mungall; Yussanne Ma; Richard Moore; Marco Marra; Eileen Stonerock; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Meenakshi Devidas; Yunfeng Dai; Brent Wood; Michael Borowitz; Eric E Larsen; Kelly Maloney; Leonard A Mattano; Anne Angiolillo; Wanda L Salzer; Michael J Burke; Francesca Gianni; Orietta Spinelli; Jerald P Radich; Mark D Minden; Anthony V Moorman; Bella Patel; Adele K Fielding; Jacob M Rowe; Selina M Luger; Ravi Bhatia; Ibrahim Aldoss; Stephen J Forman; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Krzysztof Mrózek; Guido Marcucci; Clara D Bloomfield; Wendy Stock; Steven Kornblau; Hagop M Kantarjian; Marina Konopleva; Elisabeth Paietta; Cheryl L Willman; Mignon L Loh; Stephen P Hunger; Charles G Mullighan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Single-cell whole-genome sequencing reveals the functional landscape of somatic mutations in B lymphocytes across the human lifespan.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Xiao Dong; Moonsook Lee; Alexander Y Maslov; Tao Wang; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer.

Authors:  Ludmil B Alexandrov; Serena Nik-Zainal; David C Wedge; Samuel A J R Aparicio; Sam Behjati; Andrew V Biankin; Graham R Bignell; Niccolò Bolli; Ake Borg; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Sandrine Boyault; Birgit Burkhardt; Adam P Butler; Carlos Caldas; Helen R Davies; Christine Desmedt; Roland Eils; Jórunn Erla Eyfjörd; John A Foekens; Mel Greaves; Fumie Hosoda; Barbara Hutter; Tomislav Ilicic; Sandrine Imbeaud; Marcin Imielinski; Marcin Imielinsk; Natalie Jäger; David T W Jones; David Jones; Stian Knappskog; Marcel Kool; Sunil R Lakhani; Carlos López-Otín; Sancha Martin; Nikhil C Munshi; Hiromi Nakamura; Paul A Northcott; Marina Pajic; Elli Papaemmanuil; Angelo Paradiso; John V Pearson; Xose S Puente; Keiran Raine; Manasa Ramakrishna; Andrea L Richardson; Julia Richter; Philip Rosenstiel; Matthias Schlesner; Ton N Schumacher; Paul N Span; Jon W Teague; Yasushi Totoki; Andrew N J Tutt; Rafael Valdés-Mas; Marit M van Buuren; Laura van 't Veer; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Nicola Waddell; Lucy R Yates; Jessica Zucman-Rossi; P Andrew Futreal; Ultan McDermott; Peter Lichter; Matthew Meyerson; Sean M Grimmond; Reiner Siebert; Elías Campo; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Stefan M Pfister; Peter J Campbell; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  De novo activating mutations drive clonal evolution and enhance clonal fitness in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia.

Authors:  Axel Hyrenius-Wittsten; Mattias Pilheden; Helena Sturesson; Jenny Hansson; Michael P Walsh; Guangchun Song; Julhash U Kazi; Jian Liu; Ramprasad Ramakrishan; Cristian Garcia-Ruiz; Stephanie Nance; Pankaj Gupta; Jinghui Zhang; Lars Rönnstrand; Anne Hultquist; James R Downing; Karin Lindkvist-Petersson; Kajsa Paulsson; Marcus Järås; Tanja A Gruber; Jing Ma; Anna K Hagström-Andersson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Distinct age-associated molecular profiles in acute myeloid leukemia defined by comprehensive clinical genomic profiling.

Authors:  Katherine Tarlock; Shan Zhong; Yuting He; Rhonda Ries; Eric Severson; Mark Bailey; Samantha Morley; Sohail Balasubramanian; Rachel Erlich; Doron Lipson; Geoff A Otto; Jo-Anne Vergillo; E Anders Kolb; Jeffrey S Ross; Tariq Mughal; Philip J Stephens; Vincent Miller; Soheil Meshinchi; Jie He
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-29

Review 10.  The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.

Authors:  Jonathan R Sillar; Zacary P Germon; Geoffry N DeIuliis; Matthew D Dun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  2 in total

1.  Single base substitution and insertion/deletion mutational signatures in adult core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Rebeqa Gunnarsson; Minjun Yang; Andrea Biloglav; Vladimir Lazarevic; Kajsa Paulsson; Bertil Johansson
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 12.883

2.  Distinct genomic landscape of Chinese pediatric acute myeloid leukemia impacts clinical risk classification.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Jianan Rao; Wenting Hu; Bowen Cui; Jiaoyang Cai; Yuhan Liu; Huiying Sun; Xiaoxiao Chen; Yanjing Tang; Jing Chen; Xiang Wang; Han Wang; Wubin Qian; Binchen Mao; Sheng Guo; Ronghua Wang; Yu Liu; Shuhong Shen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 17.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.