Literature DB >> 24863014

National trends in the utilization of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: an analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

M Francesca Monn1, K Clint Cary2, Hristos Z Kaimakliotis2, Chandra K Flack2, Michael O Koch2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine temporal and regional trends in utilization of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) in the United States and to explore factors associated with utilization of robotic assistance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 2009 to 2011 data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified radical cystectomy cases that were performed using either open or robotic assistance and applied Nationwide Inpatient Sample discharge weights to determine national incidence. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to assess regional trends and characteristics associated with having RARC. Descriptive analysis was performed using the chi-square test, the Student t test, and the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: Of the 29,719 radical cystectomy patients, 3,733 were RARC (12.6%). Although there was no change in the proportion of RARC performed annually (P = 0.702). Length of stay was 1 day longer for open cystectomy than RARC (P<0.001). On multivariate regression, patients whose primary payer was Medicaid were less likely than private insurance patients to undergo RARC (odds ratio = 0.60, P = 0.074). Additionally, patients in the south were at 50% reduced odds of undergoing RARC (odds ratio = 0.49, P = 0.044). Median hospital costs were $5,000 greater for RARC (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Regional variation in utilization should be monitored to ensure equal access to new technology and to assess potential overuse of new technology. Although RARC is associated with higher median hospital costs, further studies to assess its benefits are warranted.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radical cystectomy; Robotic assistance; Urothelial bladder cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24863014     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  15 in total

1.  Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Bladder Cancer Survival: Analysis of the California Cancer Registry.

Authors:  John M Sung; Jeremy W Martin; Francis A Jefferson; Daniel A Sidhom; Keyhan Piranviseh; Melissa Huang; Nobel Nguyen; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Hoda Anton-Culver; Ramy F Youssef
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 2.  Practical tips for safe and efficient robotic cystectomy.

Authors:  Gregory M Janda; Michael E Woods; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Mapping the Diffusion of Technology in Orthopaedic Surgery: Understanding the Spread of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel C Austin; Michael T Torchia; Jonathan D Lurie; David S Jevsevar; John-Erik Bell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Commentary: Utilization Trends of Cervical Disk Replacement in the United States.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Mohammed Ali Alvi; Anshit Goyal; Daniel S Ubl; Jenna Meyer; Elizabeth B Habermann; Bradford L Currier; Mohamad Bydon
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.703

5.  Surgical control and margin status after robotic and open cystectomy in high-risk cases: Caution or equivalence?

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Michael A Poch; Julio M Pow-Sang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Surgical and pathological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the community setting.

Authors:  E M DiLizia; F Sadeghi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-08-23

Review 7.  Alvimopan for recovery of bowel function after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Shahnaz Sultan; Bernadette Coles; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-02

8.  Socioeconomic status is associated with urinary diversion utilization after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Simon P Kim; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Real-World Impact of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Cystectomy on Perioperative Outcomes and Spending.

Authors:  Parth K Modi; Brent K Hollenbeck; Mary Oerline; Alon Z Weizer; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Samuel D Kaffenberger; Andrew M Ryan; Chad Ellimoottil
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Robotic assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a review of what we do and don't know.

Authors:  Zeynep G Gul; Andrew B Katims; Jared S Winoker; Peter Wiklund; Nikhil Waingankar; Reza Mehrazin
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.