Literature DB >> 30060145

Commentary: Utilization Trends of Cervical Disk Replacement in the United States.

Panagiotis Kerezoudis1,2, Mohammed Ali Alvi1,2, Anshit Goyal1,2, Daniel S Ubl3, Jenna Meyer1,2,4, Elizabeth B Habermann3, Bradford L Currier5, Mohamad Bydon1,2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 30060145      PMCID： PMC6887722          DOI： 10.1093/ons/opy181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)        ISSN： 2332-4252            Impact factor:   2.703


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

1.  Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.

Authors:  Anton E Dmitriev; Bryan W Cunningham; Nianbin Hu; Gregory Sell; Franco Vigna; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Jamie E Anderson; David C Chang; J Kellogg Parsons; Mark A Talamini
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Cervical disk arthroplasty: patient selection.

Authors:  Dale Ding; Mark E Shaffrey
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  2012

4.  Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes.

Authors:  Wissam J Halabi; Celeste Y Kang; Mehraneh D Jafari; Vinh Q Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Clinical and radiographic features of hybrid surgery for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A minimum 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Ting-Kui Wu; Bei-Yu Wang; Ding Cheng; Xin Rong; Ji-Gang Lou; Ying Hong; Hao Liu
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Artificial Disk Replacement Combined With Fusion Versus 2-Level Fusion in Cervical 2-Level Disk Disease With a 5-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Gyu Yeul Ji; Chang Hyun Oh; Dong Ah Shin; Yoon Ha; Seong Yi; Keung Nyun Kim; Hyun Cheol Shin; Do Heum Yoon
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?

Authors:  Peng-Yuan Chang; Hsuan-Kan Chang; Jau-Ching Wu; Wen-Cheng Huang; Li-Yu Fay; Tsung-Hsi Tu; Ching-Lan Wu; Henrich Cheng
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-03-10

8.  Comparison between cervical total disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of 1 to 2 levels from 2002 to 2009.

Authors:  Sreeharsha V Nandyala; Alejandro Marquez-Lara; Steven J Fineberg; Kern Singh
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of cervical kinematics between patients with cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disc herniation.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Lee; Jin Sung Kim; June Ho Lee; Ewy Ryong Chung; Chan Shik Shim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Cervical disc arthroplasty: Pros and cons.

Authors:  Bradley Moatz; P Justin Tortolani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Accuracy of various fluoroscopic landmarks for determination of midline implant placement within the cervical disc space.

Authors:  Peter B Derman; Erik Waldorff; Nianli Zhang; Ram Haddas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.134
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.