OBJECTIVE: To understand the burden of medication use for patients with newly diagnosed diabetes both before and after diabetes diagnosis and to identify subpopulations of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes who face a relatively high drug burden. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 11 integrated health systems in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 196,654 insured adults 20 years of age or older newly diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes from January 2005 through December 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of unique therapeutic classes of drugs dispensed in the 12 months before and 12 months after diagnosis of diabetes in five categories: overall, antihypertensive agents, antihyperlipidemic agents, mental health agents, and antihyperglycemic agents (in the postdiagnosis period only). RESULTS: The mean number of drug classes used by newly diagnosed patients with diabetes is high before diagnosis (5.0) and increases significantly afterward (6.6). Of this increase, 81% is due to antihyperglycemic initiation and increased use of medications to control hypertension and lipid levels. Multivariate analyses showed that overall drug burden after diabetes diagnosis was higher in women, older, white, and obese patients, as well as among those with higher glycosylated hemoglobin concentrations and comorbidity levels (significant for all comparisons). The overall number of drug classes used by newly diagnosed patients with diabetes after diagnosis decreased slightly but significantly between 2005 and 2009. CONCLUSION: Patients newly diagnosed with diabetes face a substantially increased burden of medications used to control diabetes and other comorbidities. This study shows an increased focus on cardiovascular disease risk factor control after diagnosis of diabetes. However, total drug burden may be slightly decreasing over time.
OBJECTIVE: To understand the burden of medication use for patients with newly diagnosed diabetes both before and after diabetes diagnosis and to identify subpopulations of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes who face a relatively high drug burden. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 11 integrated health systems in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 196,654 insured adults 20 years of age or older newly diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes from January 2005 through December 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of unique therapeutic classes of drugs dispensed in the 12 months before and 12 months after diagnosis of diabetes in five categories: overall, antihypertensive agents, antihyperlipidemic agents, mental health agents, and antihyperglycemic agents (in the postdiagnosis period only). RESULTS: The mean number of drug classes used by newly diagnosed patients with diabetes is high before diagnosis (5.0) and increases significantly afterward (6.6). Of this increase, 81% is due to antihyperglycemic initiation and increased use of medications to control hypertension and lipid levels. Multivariate analyses showed that overall drug burden after diabetes diagnosis was higher in women, older, white, and obesepatients, as well as among those with higher glycosylated hemoglobin concentrations and comorbidity levels (significant for all comparisons). The overall number of drug classes used by newly diagnosed patients with diabetes after diagnosis decreased slightly but significantly between 2005 and 2009. CONCLUSION:Patients newly diagnosed with diabetes face a substantially increased burden of medications used to control diabetes and other comorbidities. This study shows an increased focus on cardiovascular disease risk factor control after diagnosis of diabetes. However, total drug burden may be slightly decreasing over time.
Authors: Leah Marcotte; Joshua Seidman; Karen Trudel; Donald M Berwick; David Blumenthal; Farzad Mostashari; Sachin H Jain Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-05-14
Authors: Nihar R Desai; William H Shrank; Michael A Fischer; Jerry Avorn; Joshua N Liberman; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Juliana Pakes; Troyen A Brennan; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Am J Med Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: J R Downs; M Clearfield; S Weis; E Whitney; D R Shapiro; P A Beere; A Langendorfer; E A Stein; W Kruyer; A M Gotto Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-05-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Connie S Uratsu; Andrew J Karter; Michele Heisler; Usha Subramanian; Carol M Mangione; Joe V Selby Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Gregory A Nichols; Jay Desai; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Jean M Lawrence; Patrick J O'Connor; Ram D Pathak; Marsha A Raebel; Robert J Reid; Joseph V Selby; Barbara G Silverman; John F Steiner; W F Stewart; Suma Vupputuri; Beth Waitzfelder Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Alanna M Chamberlain; Sarah S Cohen; Jill M Killian; Keri L Monda; Susan A Weston; Ted Okerson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Jay Desai; Emily B Schroeder; Andrea R Paolino; Gregory A Nichols; Jean M Lawrence; Patrick J O'Connor; Kris A Ohnsorg; Katherine M Newton; John F Steiner Journal: Healthc (Amst) Date: 2015-03-13
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Gregory A Nichols; Wendy Dyer; John F Steiner; Andrew J Karter; Marsha A Raebel Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.983