OBJECTIVE: Six oral medication classes have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Although all of these agents effectively lower blood glucose, the evidence supporting their impact on other clinical events is variable. There also are substantial cost differences between agents. We aimed to evaluate temporal trends in the use of specific drugs for the initial management of type 2 diabetes and to estimate the economic consequences of non-recommended care. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 254,973 patients, aged 18 to 100 years, who were newly initiated on oral hypoglycemic monotherapy between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2008, by using prescription claims data from a large pharmacy benefit manager. Linear regression models were used to assess whether medication initiation patterns changed over time. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent predictors of receiving initial therapy with metformin. We then measured the economic consequences of prescribing patterns by drug class for both patients and the insurer. RESULTS: Over the course of the study period, the proportion of patients initially treated with metformin increased from 51% to 65%, whereas those receiving sulfonylureas decreased from 26% to 18% (P<.001 for both). There was a significant decline in the use of thiazolidinediones (20.1%-8.3%, P<.001) and an increase in prescriptions for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (0.4%-7.3%, P<.001). Younger patients, women, and patients receiving drug benefits through Medicare were least likely to initiate treatment with metformin. Combined patient and insurer spending for patients who were initiated on alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, meglitinides, or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors was $677 over a 6-month period compared with $116 and $118 for patients initiated on metformin or a sulfonylurea, respectively, a cost difference of approximately $1120 annually per patient. CONCLUSION: Approximately 35% of patients initiating an oral hypoglycemic drug did not receive recommended initial therapy with metformin. These practice patterns also have substantial implications for health care spending. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: Six oral medication classes have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Although all of these agents effectively lower blood glucose, the evidence supporting their impact on other clinical events is variable. There also are substantial cost differences between agents. We aimed to evaluate temporal trends in the use of specific drugs for the initial management of type 2 diabetes and to estimate the economic consequences of non-recommended care. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 254,973 patients, aged 18 to 100 years, who were newly initiated on oral hypoglycemic monotherapy between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2008, by using prescription claims data from a large pharmacy benefit manager. Linear regression models were used to assess whether medication initiation patterns changed over time. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent predictors of receiving initial therapy with metformin. We then measured the economic consequences of prescribing patterns by drug class for both patients and the insurer. RESULTS: Over the course of the study period, the proportion of patients initially treated with metformin increased from 51% to 65%, whereas those receiving sulfonylureas decreased from 26% to 18% (P<.001 for both). There was a significant decline in the use of thiazolidinediones (20.1%-8.3%, P<.001) and an increase in prescriptions for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (0.4%-7.3%, P<.001). Younger patients, women, and patients receiving drug benefits through Medicare were least likely to initiate treatment with metformin. Combined patient and insurer spending for patients who were initiated on alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, meglitinides, or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors was $677 over a 6-month period compared with $116 and $118 for patients initiated on metformin or a sulfonylurea, respectively, a cost difference of approximately $1120 annually per patient. CONCLUSION: Approximately 35% of patients initiating an oral hypoglycemic drug did not receive recommended initial therapy with metformin. These practice patterns also have substantial implications for health care spending. Copyright Â
Authors: David J Graham; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom; Thomas E MaCurdy; Farzana Ali; Christopher Sholley; Christopher Worrall; Jeffrey A Kelman Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-06-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J P Boyle; A A Honeycutt; K M Narayan; T J Hoerger; L S Geiss; H Chen; T J Thompson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Tina Ken Schramm; Gunnar Hilmar Gislason; Allan Vaag; Jeppe Nørgaard Rasmussen; Fredrik Folke; Morten Lock Hansen; Emil Loldrup Fosbøl; Lars Køber; Mette Lykke Norgaard; Mette Madsen; Peter Riis Hansen; Christian Torp-Pedersen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: William H Shrank; Emily R Cox; Michael A Fischer; Jyotsna Mehta; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2009 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Shari Bolen; Leonard Feldman; Jason Vassy; Lisa Wilson; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Spyridon Marinopoulos; Crystal Wiley; Elizabeth Selvin; Renee Wilson; Eric B Bass; Frederick L Brancati Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2007-07-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: David M Nathan; John B Buse; Mayer B Davidson; Ele Ferrannini; Rury R Holman; Robert Sherwin; Bernard Zinman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Sei J Lee; Irena Stijacic-Cenzer; Caroline Barnhart; Keelan McClymont; Michael A Steinman Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Ronan T Grimes; Kathleen Bennett; Lesley Tilson; Cara Usher; Susan M Smith; Martin C Henman Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Marsha A Raebel; Wendy Dyer; Stanley Xu; Glenn K Goodrich; Emily B Schroeder; Jodi B Segal; Patrick J O' Connor; Gregory A Nichols; Jean M Lawrence; H Lester Kirchner; Andy J Karter; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Melissa G Butler; John F Steiner Journal: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) Date: 2014 Jul-Aug
Authors: Katherine M Reitz; Oscar C Marroquin; Mazen S Zenati; Jason Kennedy; Mary Korytkowski; Edith Tzeng; Stephen Koscum; David Newhouse; Ricardo Martinez Garcia; Jennifer Vates; Timothy R Billiar; Brian S Zuckerbraun; Richard L Simmons; Stephen Shapiro; Christopher W Seymour; Derek C Angus; Matthew R Rosengart; Matthew D Neal Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 14.766