Literature DB >> 24860556

Effect of methylglyoxal on multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Katsuhiko Hayashi1, Aiko Fukushima2, Mitsuko Hayashi-Nishino2, Kunihiko Nishino2.   

Abstract

Honey has a complex chemistry, and its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity varies with floral source, climate, and harvesting conditions. Methylglyoxal was identified as the dominant antibacterial component of manuka honey. Although it has been known that methylglyoxal has antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, there is not much information describing its activity against gram-negative bacteria. In this study, we report the effect of methylglyoxal against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRP) using 53 clinically isolated strains. We also assessed the effect of deleting the five multidrug efflux systems in P. aeruginosa, as well as the efflux systems in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, on MICs of methylglyoxal. Our results indicate that methylglyoxal inhibits the growth of MDRP at concentrations of 128-512 μg/ml (1.7-7.1 mM) and is not recognized by drug efflux systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pseudomonas aeruginosa; drug efflux system; manuka honey; methylglyoxal; multidrug resistance

Year:  2014        PMID: 24860556      PMCID: PMC4029012          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is endemic among critically ill patients, and multidrug-resistant strains are increasingly being isolated in intensive care units (Ortega et al., 2004). Because P. aeruginosa is a virulent organism susceptible to a limited number of antibiotic agents, infections caused by this organism are difficult to cure and often require combination therapy. Multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (MDRP) has been defined as P. aeruginosa resistant to imipenem, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin (Sekiguchi et al., 2007). The increasing resistance of P. aeruginosa is a growing threat to the clinical management of such infections (Ortega et al., 2004). In bacteria, resistance to bactericidal agents is often associated with multidrug efflux systems, which decrease cellular drug accumulation (Nikaido, 1996). In gram-negative bacteria, systems belonging to the resistance/nodulation/division (RND) family are particularly effective in generating resistance because they form a tripartite complex with the periplasmic proteins of the membrane fusion protein family and an outer membrane channel, ensuring that drugs are pumped out directly to the external medium (Nikaido and Pages, 2012). P. aeruginosa expresses several RND-type multidrug efflux systems, including MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN, and MexXY, which are significant determinants of multidrug resistance in laboratory and clinical isolates (Poole, 2004; Piddock, 2006; Lister et al., 2009). These systems are three-component systems comprising antiporters of the RND family driven by proton motive force (MexB, MexD, MexF, and MexY), outer membrane channels (OprM, OprJ, and OprN), and periplasmic membrane fusion proteins (MexA, MexC, MexF, and MexX). These pumps function in a manner similar to AcrAB–TolC, which is the best-studied RND-type multidrug pump of Escherichia coli (Nakashima et al., 2011; Nikaido, 2011). It is necessary to develop drugs that are not recognized by the efflux pumps to prevent multidrug resistance modulated by drug efflux systems. Honey has several antibacterial features that are distinct from classical antibiotics, including high osmolarity, low pH, and generation of hydrogen peroxide by the bee-derived enzyme glucose oxidase (Allen et al., 1991). Antibacterial phenolic components have been identified in honey (Weston et al., 1999), and an antimicrobial peptide has been discovered in a Dutch medical-grade honey produced from an undisclosed floral source cultivated in greenhouses (Kwakman et al., 2010). Manuka honey is derived from nectar that has been collected by honey bees (Apis mellifera) foraging on a shrub known as manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) that is indigenous to New Zealand. Manuka honey is broad in spectrum, able to inhibit a diverse range of bacterial and yeast pathogens, and equally effective against multidrug-resistant bacteria (Blair et al., 2009; Henriques et al., 2010; Kwakman et al., 2011). It is used in modern wound-care formulations and has been shown to eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from wounds (Natarajan et al., 2001; Blaser et al., 2007; Gethin and Cowman, 2008; Visavadia et al., 2008). Clinically isolated strains of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant staphylococci were shown to be equally susceptible to manuka honey in vitro, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) reported to be <3% (v/v) [equivalent to 41,000 mg/L or 4.1% (w/v)] (Cooper et al., 1999, 2002b). Methylglyoxal was identified as the dominant active antibacterial component of manuka honey (Mavric et al., 2008; Adams et al., 2009b). Active manuka honey contains high levels of the reactive dicarbonyl methylglyoxal (Mavric et al., 2008; Adams et al., 2009a), which is formed nonenzymatically from nectar-derived dihydroxyacetone during ripening. Methylglyoxal was also found to be produced from dihydrocyacetone phosphate in E. coli, initiating a bypass of the glycolytic pathway (Cooper and Anderson, 1970). It was suggested that methylglyoxal inhibits protein synthesis by reacting with guanine residues in RNA and its precursors. It also inhibits DNA synthesis by reacting with guanine residues in DNA and its precursors (Krymkiewicz et al., 1971). It has been known that methylglyoxal has antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. It was also reported that methylglyoxal containing manuka honey is biocidal against S. aureus strains at a concentration of 33–66% w/v (equivalent methylglyoxal concentration, 260–530 μg/ml) (Jervis-Bardy et al., 2011). However, there is not much information describing methylglyoxal activity against gram-negative bacteria. Although it was previously reported that manuka honey is bactericidal against P. aeruginosa (Roberts et al., 2012), the effect of methylglyoxal on MDRP has been unknown. In this study, we report the antibacterial effect of methylglyoxal on MDRP using 53 clinically isolated strains. We also demonstrate that methylglyoxal is not recognized by drug efflux systems in P. aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, and E. coli.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. We used P. aeruginosa PAO1 (Stover et al., 2000), S. enterica serovar Typhimurium ATCC14028s (Fields et al., 1986), and E. coli MG1655 (Blattner et al., 1997) as wild-type strains. All clinically isolated MDRP strains, which showed resistance to imipenem, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin, were kindly provided by Biomedical Laboratories, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan).
Table 1

Bacterial strains used in this study.

StrainCharacteristicsSource or references
MDRP1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 38, 39, 41, 42, 44, 45, 46, 50, 57, 60, 62, 63, 67, 71, 72, 74, 75, 83, 86, 87, 88, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 98, 100, 101, 103, 105, 106MDRP strains, clinically isolatedBiomedical Laboratories, Inc.
PAO1Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild-typeStover et al., 2000
PMX52ΔmexAB oprM mexCD oprJ mexEF oprN mexXY mexHI opmD, PAO1 derivativeSekiya et al., 2003
MG1655Escherichia coli wild-typeBlattner et al., 1997
NKE1329ΔacrB acrD mdtABC mdtEF acrEF, MG1655 derivativeThis study
NKE95ΔtolC, MG1655 derivativeThis study
ATCC14028sSalmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium wild-typeFields et al., 1986
NKS196ΔacrAB acrEF acrD mdtABC mdsABC emrAB mdfA mdtK macAB, ATCC14028s derivativeHoriyama et al., 2011
NKS233ΔtolC, ATCC14028s derivativeYamasaki et al., 2011

MDRP, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Bacterial strains used in this study. MDRP, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Construction of gene deletion mutants

P. aeruginosa PMX52 (Sekiya et al., 2003), a PAO1-derived strain lacking the genes encoding the MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN, MexXY, and MexHI-OpmD drug efflux systems, was kindly provided by Tomofusa Tsuchiya of Ritsumeikan University, Japan. S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strains NKS196 (ΔacrAB acrEF acrD mdtABC mdsABC emrAB mdfA mdtK macAB) and NKS233 (ΔtolC) were constructed as described previously (Horiyama et al., 2011; Yamasaki et al., 2011). To construct E. coli strains NKE1329 (ΔacrB acrD mdtABC mdtEF acrEF) and NKE95 (ΔtolC), we performed gene disruption using procedures described previously (Datsenko and Wanner, 2000). The following oligonucleotide primers were used for the construction of the mutants: acrB-P1 (AAAAAGGCCGCTTACGCGGCCTTAGTGATTACACGTTGTAGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC); acrB-P2 (GAACAGTCCAAGTCTTAACTTAAACAGGAGCCGTTAAGACCATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG); acrD-P1 (TGAAAAAGGCGACACATTGGCATGTCGCCTTTTTTATTGCGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC); acrD-P2 (AAGCCTACAACGATACGCAGAAACACGAGGTCCTCTTTTACATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG); mdtA-P1 (ATCATTCCGCGAAACGTTTCAGGAAGAGAAACTCTTAACGGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC); mdtC-P2 (GAGATACACCACCGGCGTGGTATACAGCGTAAGGAGCTGGCATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG); mdtE-P1 (TTAAAGAACCGTTATTTCTCAAGAATTTTCAGGGACTAAAGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC); mdtF-P2 (AGGCTGAACCTTCATGTTCAACCTTACTCTCATTTACACGCATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG); acrE-P1 (TTGGGTAAATAACGCGCTTTTGGTTTTTTGAGGAATAGTAGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC); acrF-P2 (AAATAATAAAGGCACCCGAAAGCGCCTTTATGTTTCTGATCATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG); tolC-P1 (ACTGGTGCCGGGCTATCAGGCGCATAACCATCAGCAATAGGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC); and tolC-P2 (TTACAGTTTGATCGCGCTAAATACTGCTTCACCACAAGGACATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG). The chloramphenicol resistance gene cat or the kanamycin resistance gene aph, flanked by Flp recognition sites, was amplified by PCR using the primers listed above. The resulting PCR products were used to transform E. coli MG1655, which harbors plasmid pKD46, expressing Red recombinase. The chromosomal structures of the mutated loci were verified by PCR; cat and aph were further eliminated using the plasmid pCP20, as described previously (Datsenko and Wanner, 2000). To construct the NKE1329 strain, the deletions were transferred to strains by P22 transduction, as described previously Davis et al. (1980).

Determination of MICs of antimicrobial compounds

Antibacterial activities were determined on Muller Hinton II agar (Becton Dickinson & Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) plates containing methylglyoxal (32–2048 μg/ml), imipenem (0.0625–2048 μg/ml), amikacin (0.125–4096 μg/ml), or ciprofloxacin (0.0078–2048 μg/ml) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Agar plates were prepared using the two-fold agar dilution technique. Bacteria were grown at 37°C overnight and then tested at a final inoculum volume of 1 × 105 cfu/μl using a multipoint inoculator (Sakuma Seisakusyo, Tokyo, Japan). The inoculated agar plates were examined after incubation at 37°C for 16 h. MIC was the lowest concentration of a compound that inhibited cell growth.

Measurement of bacterial growth in the presence of methylglyoxal

E. coli (MG1655, NKE1329, and NKE95) and S. enterica (ATCC14028s, NKS196, and NKS233) strains were grown in Luria–Bertani broth (Becton Dickinson & Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and P. aeruginosa (PAO1 and PMX52) strains were grown in Muller Hinton II (MHII) broth (Becton Dickinson & Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Bacterial cells were cultured overnight at 37°C, and then 100 μl of cell cultures were diluted in 5 ml of the same medium. The diluted bacterial cells were incubated at 37°C until OD600 reached 0.5. Then, the bacterial cells were diluted in the same medium to an OD600 of 0.05. This diluted bacterial cells were incubated in NUNC Edge 96-well plates (Thermo scientific, MA, USA) with shaking at 37°C for 7 h. Bacterial growth was monitored using an Infinite M200 Pro plate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland).

Results and discussion

MICs of imipenem, amikacin, or ciprofloxacin for clinically isolated MDRP

MDRP has been defined as P. aeruginosa resistant to imipenem (MIC, ≥16 μg/ml), amikacin (≥32 μg/ml), and ciprofloxacin (≥4 μg/ml) (Sekiguchi et al., 2007). Using this criterion, we determined that all 53 clinical isolates were MDRP (Table 2). The highest MIC of imipenem for strains MDRP7, 14, 45, 74, and 83 was 512 μg/ml. The highest MIC of amikacin for strains MDRP30 and 57 was 2048 μg/ml. The highest MIC of ciprofloxacin for strains MDRP10, 29, and 32 was 1024 μg/ml.
Table 2

Susceptibility of MDRP strains to antimicrobial compounds.

MIC (μg/ml)
StrainMGOIPMAMKCPFX
MDRP1, 31, 75, 100512128102464
MDRP25123212832
MDRP4256128102464
MDRP525612812832
MDRP751251251264
MDRP851225651264
MDRP9, 19, 86, 93512256102464
MDRP10, 2951225610241024
MDRP125121625664
MDRP1351232256128
MDRP1412851210242
MDRP205122561024512
MDRP21512166432
MDRP24, 8851212851264
MDRP25, 46512256512128
MDRP30512256204864
MDRP31, 75, 100512128102464
MDRP325122565121024
MDRP335126412816
MDRP385123212816
MDRP395123225632
MDRP4125612851264
MDRP42, 9551225625664
MDRP445121612864
MDRP45512512256128
MDRP502562561024512
MDRP575122562048128
MDRP60, 985123212864
MDRP6251216256256
MDRP6351264128512
MDRP675123251264
MDRP71, 103512256128512
MDRP72512256512512
MDRP74512512102464
MDRP8351251225616
MDRP87512128512128
MDRP92, 9451225651232
MDRP96512256512128
MDRP10151225625632
MDRP10551232128128
MDRP1065126451264

MGO, methylglyoxal; IPM, imipenem; AMK, amikacin; CPFX, ciprofloxacin; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MDRP, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MIC determinations were repeated at least three times.

Susceptibility of MDRP strains to antimicrobial compounds. MGO, methylglyoxal; IPM, imipenem; AMK, amikacin; CPFX, ciprofloxacin; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MDRP, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MIC determinations were repeated at least three times.

Susceptibilities of MDRP strains to methylglyoxal

To evaluate the antibacterial activity of methylglyoxal against clinically isolated MDRP strains, we determined MICs using the 53 confirmed MDRP strains. The MIC of methylglyoxal for most of the MDRP strains was 512 μg/ml (Table 2), whereas the susceptibilities of these strains to imipenem, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin were different. The methylglyoxal concentration at which MDRP14 was susceptible was 128 μg/ml and that at which MDRP4, 5, 41, and 50 were susceptible was 256 μg/ml. We also tested the methylglyoxal susceptibility of the drug-sensitive wild-type strain P. aeruginosa PAO1. The MIC of methylglyoxal for PAO1 was 512 μg/ml (Table 3), which was the same that for most of the MDRP strains.
Table 3

Susceptibility of drug efflux mutants to antimicrobial compounds.

MIC (μg/ml)
StrainMGOIPMAMKCPFX
PAO1 (P. aeruginosa wild-type)5122160.25
PMX52 (ΔmexAB oprM mexCD oprJ mexEF oprN mexXY mexHI opmD)512220.016
MG1655 (E. coli wild-type)2560.2510.031
NKE1329 (ΔacrB acrD mdtABC mdtEF acrEF)2560.51≤0.0078
NKE95 (ΔtolC)2560.50.5≤0.0078
ATCC14028s (S. enterica wild-type)2560.2540.031
NKS196 (ΔacrAB acrEF acrD mdtABC mdsABC emrAB mdfA mdtK macAB)2560.52≤0.0078
NKS233 (ΔtolC)2560.52≤0.0078

MGO, methylglyoxal; IPM, imipenem; AMK, amikacin; and CPFX, ciprofloxacin; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MDRP, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MIC determinations were repeated at least three times.

Susceptibility of drug efflux mutants to antimicrobial compounds. MGO, methylglyoxal; IPM, imipenem; AMK, amikacin; and CPFX, ciprofloxacin; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MDRP, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MIC determinations were repeated at least three times.

Effect of drug efflux systems in P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and S. enterica to methylglyoxal

Multidrug efflux pumps in P. aeruginosa, such as MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN, and MexXY, have been shown to be significant determinants of multidrug resistance in laboratory and clinical isolates (Poole, 2004; Piddock, 2006; Lister et al., 2009). The existence of an additional multidrug efflux system, MexHI-OpmD, was also previously reported (Sekiya et al., 2003) in this organism. Because multidrug efflux systems display the ability to transport various structurally unrelated drugs, we investigated whether methylglyoxal is exported by these drug efflux systems in P. aeruginosa. For this purpose, we measured MIC of methylglyoxal for the wild-type P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 and its efflux-deficient mutant strain PMX52 (ΔmexAB oprM mexCD oprJ mexEF oprN mexXY mexHI opmD). Although PMX52 was more susceptible to amikacin and ciprofloxacin than PAO1, MIC of methylglyoxal for these strains was the same. This suggests that methylglyoxal is not recognized by drug efflux systems in P. aeruginosa. To confirm whether same phenomenon could be observed in other gram-negative bacteria, we determined MICs of methylglyoxal for the efflux-deficient mutants of E. coli and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium. There are five RND-type drug efflux systems (AcrAB, AcrD, MdtABC, MdtEF, and AcrEF) in E. coli, and all of them require the TolC outer membrane channel for their function (Nishino et al., 2003). To investigate the defect of these drug efflux systems in E. coli, we measured MICs of methylglyoxal for MG1655 (wild-type), NKE1329 (ΔacrB acrD mdtABC mdtEF acrEF), and NKE95 (ΔtolC) strains. The susceptibility of NKE1329 and NKE95 to methylglyoxal was same as that of the wild-type strain, although they were more susceptible to ciprofloxacin than the wild-type strain. S. enterica serovar Typhimurium harbors at least nine drug efflux systems belonging to RND, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion, and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamilies (Nishino et al., 2006). Seven of them (AcrAB, AcrEF, AcrD, MdtABC, MdsAbC, EmrAB, and MacAB) require TolC for their function (Horiyama et al., 2010). For S. enterica, we used ATCC14028s (wild-type), NKS196 (ΔacrAB acrEF acrD mdtABC mdsABC emrAB mdfA mdtK macAB), and NKS233 (ΔtolC) strains. Although NKS196 and NKS233 were more sensitive to ciprofloxacin than the wild-type strain ATCC14028s, MICs of methylglyoxal for ATCC14028s, NKS196, and NKS233 were the same. In addition to MIC determination using agar plates, we tested the effect of methylglyoxal on bacterial growth in liquid medium. The growth of E. coli (MG1655, NKE1329, and NKE9) and Salmonella (ATCC14028s, NKS196, and NKS233) strains was inhibited by methylglyoxal at a concentration of 256 μg/ml, and the growth of P. aeruginosa (PAO1 and PMX52) strains was inhibited at 512 μg/ml, which is consistent with MICs determined (Figure 1). These data suggest that methylglyoxal is not recognized by drug efflux systems in E. coli or S. enterica.
Figure 1

Effects of methylglyoxal on the growth of . Growth of E. coli (MG1655, NKE1329, and NKE95), S. enterica (ATCC14028s, NKS196, and NKS233), and P. aeruginosa (PAO1 and PMX52) strains were measured in liquid medium with or without methylglyoxal.

Effects of methylglyoxal on the growth of . Growth of E. coli (MG1655, NKE1329, and NKE95), S. enterica (ATCC14028s, NKS196, and NKS233), and P. aeruginosa (PAO1 and PMX52) strains were measured in liquid medium with or without methylglyoxal. In this study, we showed that methylglyoxal equally inhibits drug-susceptible P. aeruginosa and MDRP at concentrations of 128–512 μg/ml (1.7–7.1 mM). Methylglyoxal is a key antimicrobial component of manuka honey, and manuka honey has previously been suggested as a topical treatment option for burn patients infected with P. aeruginosa (Cooper et al., 2002a). Jenkins and Cooper reported that MICs of manuka honey for MRSA and methicillin-resistant P. aeruginosa were 6–7% w/v (Jenkins and Cooper, 2012). This corresponds to 50–100 μg/ml methylglyoxal when manuka honey contains 7% of methylglyoxal. Cooper et al. also reported that MIC for E. coli is 16% w/v (Cooper et al., 2010), which corresponds to approximately 200 μg/ml methylglyoxal. It was previously reported that methylglyoxal is the dominant antibacterial constituent of manuka honey and that MIC of methylglyoxal for E. coli and S. aureus, determined using the agar well diffusion assay, is 1.1 mM (79.3 μg/ml) (Mavric et al., 2008). Our data showed that methylglyoxal itself inhibits the growth of MDRP strains at high concentrations, suggesting that methylglyoxal activity might be enhanced when in honey solution. Further research is required to demonstrate whether methylglyoxal and manuka honey exert their antibacterial effects through a common mechanism. We also showed that methylglyoxal is not recognized by drug efflux systems in P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and S. enterica.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  40 in total

1.  The formation and catabolism of methylglyoxal during glycolysis in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R A. Cooper; A Anderson
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1970-12-11       Impact factor: 4.124

2.  The sensitivity to honey of Gram-positive cocci of clinical significance isolated from wounds.

Authors:  R A Cooper; P C Molan; K G Harding
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  How honey kills bacteria.

Authors:  Paulus H S Kwakman; Anje A te Velde; Leonie de Boer; Dave Speijer; Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls; Sebastian A J Zaat
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  AcrA dependency of the AcrD efflux pump in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.

Authors:  Seiji Yamasaki; Saya Nagasawa; Mitsuko Hayashi-Nishino; Akihito Yamaguchi; Kunihiko Nishino
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Mutants of Salmonella typhimurium that cannot survive within the macrophage are avirulent.

Authors:  P I Fields; R V Swanson; C G Haidaris; F Heffron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Functional cloning and characterization of a multidrug efflux pump, mexHI-opmD, from a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sekiya; Takehiko Mima; Yuji Morita; Teruo Kuroda; Tohru Mizushima; Tomofusa Tsuchiya
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Roles of TolC-dependent multidrug transporters of Escherichia coli in resistance to beta-lactams.

Authors:  Kunihiko Nishino; Junko Yamada; Hidetada Hirakawa; Takahiro Hirata; Akihito Yamaguchi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms.

Authors:  Philip D Lister; Daniel J Wolter; Nancy D Hanson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Improving antibiotic activity against wound pathogens with manuka honey in vitro.

Authors:  Rowena Jenkins; Rose Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Strategic Moves of "Superbugs" Against Available Chemical Scaffolds: Signaling, Regulation, and Challenges.

Authors:  Bikash Baral; M R Mozafari
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-04-13

2.  Annona glabra Flavonoids Act As Antimicrobials by Binding to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Cell Walls.

Authors:  Stanley de S L Galvão; Andrea de S Monteiro; Ezequias P Siqueira; Maria Rosa Q Bomfim; Marcus Vinícius Dias-Souza; Gabriella F Ferreira; Angelo Márcio L Denadai; Áquila R C Santos; Vera Lúcia Dos Santos; Elaine M de Souza-Fagundes; Elizabeth S Fernandes; Valério Monteiro-Neto
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Antibacterial Properties of Nonwoven Wound Dressings Coated with Manuka Honey or Methylglyoxal.

Authors:  Sophie E L Bulman; Giuseppe Tronci; Parikshit Goswami; Chris Carr; Stephen J Russell
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Characterizing the Mechanism of Action of an Ancient Antimicrobial, Manuka Honey, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Modern Transcriptomics.

Authors:  Daniel Bouzo; Nural N Cokcetin; Liping Li; Giulia Ballerin; Amy L Bottomley; James Lazenby; Cynthia B Whitchurch; Ian T Paulsen; Karl A Hassan; Elizabeth J Harry
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.496

5.  Diversity Analysis and Bioresource Characterization of Halophilic Bacteria Isolated from a South African Saltpan.

Authors:  Ramganesh Selvarajan; Timothy Sibanda; Memory Tekere; Hlengilizwe Nyoni; Stephen Meddows-Taylor
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Comparative Efficacy of Selected Phytobiotics with Halquinol and Tetracycline on Gut Morphology, Ileal Digestibility, Cecal Microbiota Composition and Growth Performance in Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Muhammad Abdul Basit; Arifah Abdul Kadir; Teck Chwen Loh; Saleha Abdul Aziz; Annas Salleh; Zainul Amiruddin Zakaria; Sherifat Banke Idris
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Correlation of the antibacterial activity of commercial manuka and Leptospermum honeys from Australia and New Zealand with methylglyoxal content and other physicochemical characteristics.

Authors:  Kathryn J Green; Ivan L Lawag; Cornelia Locher; Katherine A Hammer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 8.  Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effect of Honey in the Prevention of Dental Caries: A Recent Perspective.

Authors:  Juraj Deglovic; Nora Majtanova; Juraj Majtan
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-09-02

Review 9.  Interaction of antibacterial compounds with RND efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jürg Dreier; Paolo Ruggerone
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.