Literature DB >> 24859897

Trends in epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of proximal humeral fractures.

Christian Bahrs1, Tanja Stojicevic, Stojicevic Tanja, Gunnar Blumenstock, Blumenstock Gunnar, Stig Brorson, Brorson Stig, Andreas Badke, Ulrich Stöckle, Stöckle Ulrich, Bernd Rolauffs, Rolauffs Bernd, Thomas Freude, Freude Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Proximal humeral fractures are common and frequently associated with osteoporosis. Little is known about the association between the patho-anatomical fracture pattern of proximal humeral fractures and patient characteristics. The purpose of this six year longitudinal registry analysis of proximal humeral fractures was to study overall numbers, certain predefined pathoanatomical patterns and distribution compared with specific patient characteristics.
METHODS: Data of patients treated between 2006 and 2011 in a country hospital that provides care >95 % of the city's hospitalised patients with fractures was retrospectively reviewed. Data were analysed according to patient characteristics of age, gender, comorbidity, accompanying injuries and radiological analysis of pathoanatomical fracture patterns based on Neer and Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification.
RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifteen proximal humeral fractures (67% women/33% men; mean age 66 years, range 19-99) were analysed. During the study period, an overall increase of 42.5% was found: according to AO classification, 46% were type A, 22% type B and 32% type C. Based on the Neer classification, 86% were displaced, and 49% were complex with more than three parts. Of complex fractures, 57% were female patients >60 years. The number of complex fractures was five times higher in women >60 years than in men of the same age group.
CONCLUSIONS: An overall increase of inpatients with displaced proximal tibial fractures was documented. Interestingly, complex displaced proximal humeral fractures, especially in older women with comorbidities, accounted for the majority of cases. These results suggest that health-care planning and hospital-based therapeutic strategies should focus on this patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24859897      PMCID: PMC4115093          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2362-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mika Palvanen; Pekka Kannus; Seppo Niemi; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The three-dimensional anatomy of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Gordon Edelson; Husam Saffuri; Elias Obid; Fina Vigder
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Fracture hospitalizations between years 2000 and 2007 in Switzerland: a trend analysis.

Authors:  K Lippuner; A W Popp; P Schwab; M Gitlin; T Schaufler; C Senn; R Perrelet
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Changing incidence of hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori Prefecture, Japan.

Authors:  H Hagino; K Yamamoto; H Ohshiro; T Nakamura; H Kishimoto; T Nose
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  John-Erik Bell; Brian C Leung; Kevin F Spratt; Ken J Koval; James D Weinstein; David C Goodman; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures revisited: a multicenter study on 509 cases.

Authors:  Kazuya Tamai; Noriyuki Ishige; Shigehito Kuroda; Wataru Ohno; Hiromoto Itoh; Hiroshi Hashiguchi; Norishige Iizawa; Motohiko Mikasa
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 7.  Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center.

Authors:  A Roux; L Decroocq; S El Batti; N Bonnevialle; G Moineau; C Trojani; P Boileau; F de Peretti
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 8.  Diagnosing displaced four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a review of observer studies.

Authors:  Stig Brorson; Jens Bagger; Annette Sylvest; Asbjørn Hrobjartsson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007.

Authors:  Pekka Kannus; Mika Palvanen; Seppo Niemi; Harri Sievänen; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women.

Authors:  K Lippuner; H Johansson; J A Kanis; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  28 in total

1.  Age-dependent variation of glenohumeral anatomy: a radiological study.

Authors:  Benjamin Bockmann; Sonja Soschynski; Philipp Lechler; Steffen Ruchholtz; Florian Debus; Tim Schwarting; Michael Frink
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Osteological interdisciplinary management : exemplified by a bilateral proximal humeral fracture].

Authors:  C Neuerburg; K Pietschke; U Stumpf; S Sommerey; R Schmidmaier; B Ockert; W Böcker; F Haasters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Titanium mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures for the treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fracture osteosynthesis versus PHILOS: a retrospective view.

Authors:  Gang Xue; Kapil Chahal; Thou Lim; Siyuan Hu; Shaohua Li; Jie Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison between the spatial subchondral support plate and the proximal humeral locking plate in the treatment of unstable proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Lei Zhu; Di Yang; Peng Yang; Jun Ma; Qiang Fu; Aimin Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Risk factors for intra-articular involvement in proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Owain Critchley; Simon MacLean; Afsana Hasan; Richard Woodman; Gregory Bain
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?

Authors:  Malte Holschen; Maria Körting; Patrick Khourdaji; Benjamin Bockmann; Tobias L Schulte; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Non-operative treatment of four-part fractures of the proximal end of the humerus: results of a prospective and retrospective multicentric study.

Authors:  Romain Bouchet; Damien Block; Thomas D'ollonne; François Gadea; Julia Gaillot; François Sirveaux; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Evaluation of open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a locking plate with smooth pegs - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Frida Hansson; Magdalena Riddar; Anders Ekelund
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-07

9.  Why locking plates for the proximal humerus do not fit well.

Authors:  Hyungsuk Kim; Yang-Guk Chung; Ji Seok Jang; Yongdeok Kim; Soo Bin Park; Hyun Seok Song
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Iglesias-Rodríguez; Diego Matías Domínguez-Prado; Alejandro García-Reza; Daniel Fernández-Fernández; Elena Pérez-Alfonso; Javier García-Piñeiro; Manuel Castro-Menéndez
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.