Allison Kupsco1, Daniel Schlenk. 1. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California- Riverside , Riverside, California 92507, United States.
Abstract
Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient that can cause embryotoxicty at levels 7-30 times above essential concentrations. Exposure to hypersaline conditions and 50 μM selenomethionine (SeMet) decreased embryo hatch and depleted glutathione in Japanese medaka embryos without affecting Se accumulation. To better understand the impacts of nonchemical stressors on developmental toxicity of Se in fish, several adverse outcome pathways were evaluated in the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). We treated medaka embryos at 12 h post fertilization with 50 μM SeMet for 12 hours in freshwater or in 13 ppth hypersalinity and evaluated the contributions of oxidative stress, the unfolded protein response and apoptosis to reduced hatch. Exposure to SeMet and hypersalinity decreased embryo hatch to 3.7% ± 1.95, and induced teratogenesis in 100% ± 0 of hatched embryos. In contrast, treatments of freshwater, saltwater, and SeMet in freshwater resulted in 89.8% ± 3.91-86.7% ± 3.87 hatch, and no significant increase in deformities. We found no significant differences in lipid peroxidation, indicating that oxidative stress may not be responsible for the observed toxicity in embryos at this time point (24 h). Although significant changes in apoptosis were not observed, we witnessed up to 100 fold increases in transcripts of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone, immunoglobulin binding protein (BiP) and trends toward increasing downstream signals, activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and ATF6 indicating potential contributions of the unfolded protein response to the effects of SeMet and hypersaline conditions. These data indicate that multiple adverse outcome pathways may be responsible for the developmental toxicity of Se and salinity, and these pathways may be time dependent.
Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient that can cause embryotoxicty at levels 7-30 times above essential concentrations. Exposure to hypersaline conditions and 50 μM selenomethionine (SeMet) decreased embryo hatch and depleted glutathione in Japanese medaka embryos without affecting Se accumulation. To better understand the impacts of nonchemical stressors on developmental toxicity of Se in fish, several adverse outcome pathways were evaluated in the Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). We treated medaka embryos at 12 h post fertilization with 50 μM SeMet for 12 hours in freshwater or in 13 ppth hypersalinity and evaluated the contributions of oxidative stress, the unfolded protein response and apoptosis to reduced hatch. Exposure to SeMet and hypersalinity decreased embryo hatch to 3.7% ± 1.95, and induced teratogenesis in 100% ± 0 of hatched embryos. In contrast, treatments of freshwater, saltwater, and SeMet in freshwater resulted in 89.8% ± 3.91-86.7% ± 3.87 hatch, and no significant increase in deformities. We found no significant differences in lipid peroxidation, indicating that oxidative stress may not be responsible for the observed toxicity in embryos at this time point (24 h). Although significant changes in apoptosis were not observed, we witnessed up to 100 fold increases in transcripts of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone, immunoglobulin binding protein (BiP) and trends toward increasing downstream signals, activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and ATF6 indicating potential contributions of the unfolded protein response to the effects of SeMet and hypersaline conditions. These data indicate that multiple adverse outcome pathways may be responsible for the developmental toxicity of Se and salinity, and these pathways may be time dependent.
Selenium (Se) is an essential
micronutrient; levels only 7–30
times greater than required can be toxic.[1] This is a concern in aquatic environments, where anthropogenic activities
can release large quantities of Se, and include agricultural runoff
of irrigation waters in arid regions;[2] waste
rock from coal, phosphate, and uranium mining;[3−5] and combustion
waste from coal burning power plants.[6] Se
usually enters the waterways in its inorganic forms of selenate (Se+4)
or selenite (Se+6), which can be taken up by microbes and primary
producers and converted into various organic forms, including the
amino acid, selenomethionine (SeMet).[7] Consumers,
such as fish and birds, are exposed to Se primarily in the diet and
SeMet has been shown to be the major form of Se in the fish diet.[8] One concern for SeMettoxicity is its bioaccumulation
potential. SeMet has been demonstrated to move through the food chain
by trophic transfer to higher-level organisms.[9,10] Following
a Se poisoning event at Belews lake, NC, Lemly found Se to have bioaccumulated
from 519 times in periphyton to 3975 times in the visceral tissues
of fish.[10] This is of particular concern
for oviparous carnivores, for which maternal offloading may impair
development or reproductive success through respective teratogenesis
or embryo lethality.[10]Because of
the potential for biomagnification, traditional water
quality measurements of Se concentrations may be ineffective. Recently,
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has begun advocating tissue
concentration measurements for Se monitoring.[11] However, even these measurements may not provide an accurate picture
of Se effects on an ecosystem, because fish encounter multiple stressors
in their environments, which can alter Setoxicity. Recent evidence
suggests that hypersalinity may compound Setoxicity.[12] This is of particular importance in areas such as the San
Joaquin River Valley, CA, and the San Francisco Bay Delta area, where
many historically freshwater–waterways are in danger of salinization.[13] These areas are often spawning grounds for protected
species such as the endangered delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) and threatened steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).The mechanisms behind Se induced teratogenesis and mortality
remain
unclear. Several studies point to oxidative stress as one mode of
action for Setoxicity.[14−17] However, oxidative stress is most likely only one
factor influencing SeMettoxicity. The unfolded protein response (UPR)
is a cellular and molecular response to perturbations in endoplasmic
reticulum (ER) homeostasis (See Hetz (2012) for review[18]). Oxidative stress, calcium disruption, and
glycosylation inhibition, can all disrupt protein folding, leading
to the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER. Protein folding
chaperones, such as BiP (immunoglobulin- binding protein; Grp78),
initiate the UPR through dissociation from the mediators of the three
branches, PERK (protein kinase RNA (PKR)-like ER kinase), IRE1a (inositol-
requiring protein-1) and ATF6 (activating transcription factor 6).
While the three branches of the response are highly interconnected,
they can be generally divided into three categories. The PERK branch
is responsible for translational attenuation through Activating Transcription
Factor 4 (ATF4). The IRE1a branch is responsible for transcription
of ER-Associated Degradation (ERAD) genes through X box protein 1
(XBP1). And finally, ATF6 is responsible for transcription of protein
folding enzymes and chaperones. If the response is unable to attenuate
the stress, the UPR will initiate cell death, often in the form of
programmed cell death (apoptosis).We have previously demonstrated
that 50 μM of SeMet and hypersalinity
treatment for 24 h significantly decreased embryo hatch, decreased
total reduced glutathione, and increased flavin containing-monooxygenase
(FMO) activity in medaka embryos.[12] Exposure
of Japanese medaka embryos to SeMet under varied salinities did not
impact overall Se accumulation but significant differences in toxicity
were observed.[12] The purpose of the current
study was to further elucidate the mechanisms behind SeMet and hypersaline
induced embryo mortality after 12 h of SeMet treatment at developmental
stages not previously examined. We hypothesized that SeMet would induce
oxidative stress, the UPR and apoptosis in Japanese medaka embryos
and that hypersaline conditions would potentiate these effects. This
research will aid in the development for site specific monitoring
for Se in CA.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
Seleno-l-methionine
(Purity 98%), 1-butanol, phosphoric acid, thiobarbituric
acid and all other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St.
Louis, MO). A Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Billerica,
MA) was used to obtain deionized water. Ethanol (Fisher, Pittsburgh,
PA) was of molecular biology grade.
Embryo
Collection and Exposure
Japanese
Medaka were cultured at the University of California- Riverside and
housed in a 2:3 ratio of males to females in medium-hard water at
27 °C and a photoperiod of 14 h light and 10 h dark. Adults were
fed twice daily a diet of live brine shrimp. Embryos were collected
0–1 h following fertilization. Viable embryos were determined
based on oil droplet migration to the vegetal pole as outlined by
Kirchen and West (1976).[19] Nonviable embryos
were discarded and viable embryos were placed into 60 × 15 mm
Petri dishes containing either freshwater or a makeup of saltwater
from the San Joaquin River Valley (20–30 embryos per replicate,
and 5–10 replicates per group). Although, water-borne SeMet
exposures do not represent the most likely environmental exposure
(the primary exposures for SeMet are dietary or via maternal transfer),
they are sufficient to study the mechanistic effects of SeMet on medaka
embryos. San Joaquin River Valley saltwater was prepared in the lab
according to a recipe from Westlands Water District located about
10 km south of Mendota in the San Joaquin River Drainage Basin, CA.[20] Salinity was measured with a conductivity meter,
and corresponds to about 13‰ and 15.3 g/L suspended solids.Following 12 h of equilibration in fresh or salt water, the replicates
were divided into three groups. The first subset of embryos were frozen
−80 °C to represent a time zero control (12hpf). Other
embryos were treated with a 50 μM solution of Seleno-l-Methionine (Cat. No. S3132, Sigma-Aldrich) in freshwater or saltwater
and exposed for 12 h, then collected and frozen at −80 °C
for analysis (24hpf). SeMet concentrations were chosen based on previous
research and were intended to represent the upper levels of bioaccumulation
measured in embryos.[12] Previous studies
have also demonstrated uptake of SeMet into the embryo, indicating
this system was an effective exposure method.[12] The final subset of embryos were left in freshwater or saltwater
for 24 h to compare to the SeMet treated 12hpf samples.
Modified Embryo Larval Toxicity Assay
The medaka embryo-larval
toxicity assay was adapted from Farwell
et al. (2006).[21] Embryos were collected
and treated as above with one replicate equal to 15–20 embryos
per dish. Following 12 h of SeMet treatment, embryos were rinsed and
transferred to new dishes containing freshwater or saltwater. Water
was changed every other day and dishes were monitored for mortality
with removal of dead embryos. Embryo hatch was monitored for 21 days
post fertilization. At hatch, embryos were assessed for deformities
and terminated immediately. Percent hatch and percent of hatched embryos
with deformities were recorded.
Analysis
of Gene Expression
Total
mRNA was isolated from embryos using the Lipid Tissue RNeasy kit (Qiagen,
Valencia, CA) following the manufacturers instructions. mRNA quantity
and quality was measured using the ND-1000 (NanoDrop, Wilmington,
DE). mRNA (1 μg) was converted to cDNA using the Reverse Transcription
System (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI), according to the manufacturers
instructions.Primers were designed using IDTDNA PrimerQuest
software and optimized using PCR Miner[22] (Table 1). As no BAX gene for Japanese medaka
has been annotated in the NCBI database, BLAST was used on the medaka
genome (http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/tgi/Blast/index.cgi) against BAX from zebrafish (Danio rerio) to develop
primers. Similarity between the genes had an E value
of 1 × 10−48. EF1α was run as a housekeeping
gene. qPCR was performed with the iScript One-step RT-PCR kit with
SYBR Green from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA), omitting the reverse transcriptase,
on a MyiQ5 Thermo cycler (Biorad). The samples were denatured and
the polymerase activated at 95 °C for 5 min, then 40 cycles of
10s at 95 °C and 30s of 55 °C. Samples were subject to melting
curve analysis from 65 to 85 °C in 0.5 °C increments with
continuous fluorescence measurement. qPCR was analyzed according to
Schmittgen and Livak[23] and fold change
was calculated against the 12hpf freshwater controls. All data was
compared against the 12hpf controls in order represent how the gene
expression changed over the 12h time period, and how the treatments
affected this change. Rather than observing a discrete point in development,
we feel it is necessary to understand how these treatments altered
normal development.
Table 1
Primers, Accession
Numbers, and Concentrations
used for qRT-PCR
name
fwd primer
(5′-3′)
rev primer
(5′-3′)
accession
#
conc.
EF1-a
CTACATCAAGAAGATCGGCTACAA
CGACAGGGACAGTTCCAATAC
NM_001104662.1
2.5 μM
CASP3A
CCAAATCCCAGGTCTACTGATG
AGGCAAAGGAGGCAAACTTA
NM_001104670.1
5 μM
BAX
GCTGGTCATAAAGGCTCTCATC
CCAGATTGCTCGAACCGTAAA
NM_131562.2
2.5 μM
BiP
GGAGGATTCTGACCTGAAGAAG
GGTGACAGTAGGCTGGTTATC
NM_001278801.1
0.5 μM
ATF6
CAAGCCAACTCCAGTCAGTATC
GCCGACTCTCGGTTCTTTATC
NM_001278901.1
0.5 μM
ATF4
CTTAGAGGTGAAGGTGCCTATG
TGAGGAAGGAGACCTGTTAGA
XM_004066069.1
2.5 μM
Analysis of Oxidative Stress
Thiobarbituric
Reactive Substances (TBARS) were measured to estimate malondialdehyde
(MDA) formation in medaka embryos.[24] Embryos
(15–20) were weighed and homogenized in 1.15% KCl then centrifuged
at 3000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was then used
in the assay. Samples were run in duplicate on a Wallac Victor[2] multilabel plate reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham,
MA) with excitation at 535 nm and emission at 585 nm.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical
significance was assessed using a student’s T-Test or 2-way
ANOVA in the statistical program R. Statistical significance was determined
at p ≤ 0.05, unless otherwise noted. If overall
significance was determined following two-way ANOVA, Tukey’s
HSD test was performed posthoc. Data was checked for normality and
homogeneity of variances. Any non-normal data was log transformed.
For data that remained non-normal following log transformation, Kruskal–Wallis
tests were performed with Dunn’s test posthoc.
Results
Embryo-Larval Toxicity
Assay
While
there was no difference in hatch between saltwater and freshwater
control embryos, 50 μM SeMet significantly decreased embryo
hatch in saltwater treated embryos to 3.7% (Figure 1A). However, SeMet treatment in freshwater did not significantly
decrease hatch. The median day to hatch was not significantly affected
by SeMet treatment in freshwater or saltwater (Figure 1B). SeMet and hypersaline treatment also significantly increased
the deformities in treated embryos (Figure 1C). All SeMet and hypersaline treated embryos had deformities upon
hatch. The most common deformities observed were kyphosis, lordosis,
craniofacial abnormalities, and yolk sac edema (Figure 1D).
Figure 1
Effects of combined exposure of SeMet (50 μM) and hypersaline
conditions on the development and hatchability of Japanese medaka
embryos after exposure at 12 hpf. White bars represent freshwater
and black bars represent saltwater. (A) Percent hatch, (B) median
day to hatch, (C) percent deformities in hatched embryos, (D) examples
of deformities; control is top image, bottom two images demonstrate
lordosis, kyphosis, cranio-facial abnormalities, and yolk-sac edema.
Each value represents the mean ± standard error (SE) of 5–10
replicates. Statistical significance is indicated by differing letters
(Two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD test, or Kruskal–Wallis, Dunn’s
test p ≤ 0.05).
Effects of combined exposure of SeMet (50 μM) and hypersaline
conditions on the development and hatchability of Japanese medaka
embryos after exposure at 12 hpf. White bars represent freshwater
and black bars represent saltwater. (A) Percent hatch, (B) median
day to hatch, (C) percent deformities in hatched embryos, (D) examples
of deformities; control is top image, bottom two images demonstrate
lordosis, kyphosis, cranio-facial abnormalities, and yolk-sac edema.
Each value represents the mean ± standard error (SE) of 5–10
replicates. Statistical significance is indicated by differing letters
(Two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD test, or Kruskal–Wallis, Dunn’s
test p ≤ 0.05).
Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis
There
was no significant difference in amount of lipid peroxidation between
any of the treatments and no difference between embryos at 12hpf and
24hpf (Figure 2). BAX transcript levels decreased
significantly from 12hpf to 24hpf (0.2 fold, p =
0.011), while Caspase 3A levels remained constant (Figure 3A). There was no significant difference in BAX or
CASP3A gene expression following treatment with hypersalinity or SeMet
(Figure 3B and C).
Figure 2
Effects of combined exposure
of SeMet (50 μM) and hypersaline
conditions on lipid peroxidation in Japanese medaka embryos after
12 and 24 hpf. (A) TBARS was measured as nmol/g wet weight tissue
in freshwater controls at 12 hpf and 24 hpf. (B) TBARS measured in
embryos in freshwater, saltwater, SeMet in freshwater and SeMet in
saltwater at 24hpf. Hydrogen peroxide (3% for 3 h) was run as a positive
control. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 5–10 replicates
Statistical significance is denoted by differing letters at p ≤ 0.05 (One-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD test).
Figure 3
Effects of combined exposure of SeMet (50 μM) and
hypersaline
conditions on BAX and CASP3A transcripts in Japanese medaka embryos
after 12 and 24 hpf. (A) Change in BAX and CASP3A expression between
12hpf and 24hpf. Expression of (B) BAX and (C) CASP3A in freshwater,
saltwater, SeMet in freshwater and SeMet in saltwater. Each value
represents the mean ± SE of 5–10 replicates. EF1-α
was run as a housekeeping gene. Statistical significance is indicated
by differing letters (Two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD Test p ≤ 0.05).
Effects of combined exposure
of SeMet (50 μM) and hypersaline
conditions on lipid peroxidation in Japanese medaka embryos after
12 and 24 hpf. (A) TBARS was measured as nmol/g wet weight tissue
in freshwater controls at 12 hpf and 24 hpf. (B) TBARS measured in
embryos in freshwater, saltwater, SeMet in freshwater and SeMet in
saltwater at 24hpf. Hydrogen peroxide (3% for 3 h) was run as a positive
control. Each value represents the mean ± SE of 5–10 replicates
Statistical significance is denoted by differing letters at p ≤ 0.05 (One-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD test).Effects of combined exposure of SeMet (50 μM) and
hypersaline
conditions on BAX and CASP3A transcripts in Japanese medaka embryos
after 12 and 24 hpf. (A) Change in BAX and CASP3A expression between
12hpf and 24hpf. Expression of (B) BAX and (C) CASP3A in freshwater,
saltwater, SeMet in freshwater and SeMet in saltwater. Each value
represents the mean ± SE of 5–10 replicates. EF1-α
was run as a housekeeping gene. Statistical significance is indicated
by differing letters (Two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD Test p ≤ 0.05).
Gene
Expression of UPR Mediators
UPR gene expression changed from
12hpf to 24 hpf in medaka embryos.
ATF6 gene expression decreased significantly from 12hpf to 24 hpf
(0.3 fold, p = 0.019), while BiP and ATF4 expression
increased significantly (2 fold, p = 0.048, and 4
fold, p = 0.008, respectively). BiP mRNA was increased
in both saltwater and freshwater SeMet treatments up to 39 fold over
12 h controls and 107 fold over 12 h controls in the SeMet freshwater
and SeMet saltwater treatments, respectively. Though there was a trend
toward an increase in ATF6 expresssion with SeMet treatment (p = 0.119), SeMet and hypersalinity did not significantly
alter ATF6 expression. Similarly, trends in ATF4 expression indicated
a potential difference between freshwater and saltwater treatment
(p = 0.07), with SeMet decreasing ATF4 in freshwater,
yet increasing it in saltwater.
Discussion
The mechanism of action of SeMettoxicity is not well understood,
particularly in the presence of multiple stressors, which may confound
regulatory monitoring. We observed a decrease in hatch following treatment
with hypersalinity and SeMet, while surviving embryos had deformities.
Previous work at this developmental stage and SeMet concentration
reported a significant decrease in embryo hatch following 24 h of
50 μM SeMet treatment in freshwater.[12] While we did not observe this trend, our results were expected considering
the duration of SeMet treatment was half as that previously studied.
Overall, our results are consistent with a plethora of other data
reporting SeMet’s lethal and teratogenic effects in the field,
for example, ref (10).Japanese medaka are a euryhaline species; adults are able
to spawn
and embryos hatch in full seawater.[25] We
observed no significant difference in toxicity between freshwater
and hypersaline controls, indicating that our results are not due
to osmotic stress alone. Others have found salinity to potentiate
SeMettoxicity in embryos.[12] The mechanism
behind this remains to be elucidated, however, FMO may play a role.
FMOs have been shown to oxygenate SeMet, which may contribute to its
toxicity.[26,12] Several studies have found FMO activity
can increase under hypersaline conditions.[12,27,28] This increased FMO activity may increase
SeMet oxygenation, which in turn may increase its embryo toxicity.In contrast, studies have shown that SeMet activation can occur
following methioninase generation of methylselenol,[29] which can subsequently generate oxidative stress in rainbow
trout embryos.[14] Methylselenol has also
been implicated in induction of caspase-mediated apoptosis in cancer
cell lines.[30] However, considering that
neither oxidative stress nor apoptosis was induced in SeMet and hypersaline
treated embryos and that FMO has been found to be induced by hypersosmotic
conditions, we conclude that FMO activation may be a major contributor
to the observed toxicity.Of interest is that SeMet and hypersalinity
did not generate oxidative
stress as measured by lipid peroxidation after 12 h of treatment.
However, several groups, including ours, have identified oxidative
stress as one of the main modes of action of SeMettoxicity.[12−15] As lipid peroxidation is an end point for severe oxidative stress,
TBARS is not sensitive to small changes in cellular redox.[31] Furthermore, in this study, TBARS was measured
in whole embryos and did not consider localized effects. Thus, oxidative
stress may still be occurring in SeMet and hypersaline treatments,
yet it may not be detected by our assays or was not as high as that
observed after 24hpf.[12] While our results
do not eliminate oxidative stress as a mechanism of SeMet induced
embryotoxicty, they indicate that other processes may play an important
role particularly at the 12 hour time point of exposure. While we
observed no difference in whole-embryo lipid peroxidation between
12hpf and 24hpf, many studies demonstrate that the redox status of
embryos also undergoes great changes throughout development. Two contradicting
reports demonstrate the changes in redox status of medaka embryos
throughout development. Wu et al.[32] measured
changes in oxidative stress in the whole embryo each day post fertilization
using Dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (DCHFDA; a dye that fluoresces
following oxidation) and found overall reactive oxygen species (ROS)
increased gradually until hatch. In contrast, another group studying
medaka development and silver nanoparticle toxicity, found total ROS
decreased throughout development.[33] However,
in addition to total ROS, both of these studies examined multiple
biomarkers for oxidative stress and found no common patterns between
them. Hence, the current studies on redox status throughout medaka
development confirm that further studies are necessary in order to
understand this complex process.Another adverse outcome pathway
that may contribute to SeMettoxicity
in medaka at this early life stage is the UPR. Methylselenic acid
(MSA) induced the UPR in PC-3 cells, a humanprostate cancer cell
line[34] and we observed increases in BiP
expression following SeMet treatment, suggesting that SeMet may be
disrupting ER homeostasis. Although not significant, BiP mRNA expression
was higher in SeMet and hypersaline treated embryos than in embryos
in SeMet and freshwater. This would suggest that a greater UPR is
being induced in SeMet and hypersaline conditions, a mechanism that
requires further exploration. The trend toward alterations in ATF4
and ATF6 gene expression also indicated a possible role for the PERK
and ATF6 branches of the UPR in SeMettoxicity. PERK also activates
Nrf2,[35,36] a major transcription factor for antioxidant
genes during oxidative stress. This provides a link between postulated
mechanisms of oxidative stress and the UPR. It must be noted that
each branch of the UPR has a different activation step (e.g., ATF6
splicing, PERK phosphorylation)[37] according
to varying time scales and specific types of ER stress.[38] DuRose et al. (2006) compared UPR responses
generated by dithriothreitol (DTT; disrupts disulfide bond formation),
thapsigargin (Tg, inhibits ER Calcium-dependent ATPase), and tunicamycin
(Tm, inhibits protein glycosylation). The ATF6 response to DTT was
the most rapid of the three branches, yet it was significantly less
sensitive to Tg and Tm.[38] In contrast,
PERK responded most rapidly to calcium disruption caused by Tg. These
responses occurred on different time scales and at different magnitudes;
overall, activation of the branches in response to DTT was faster
and stronger than to Tm and Tg.[38] The varied
time scales of each branch of the response to different types of ER
stress indicate the necessity to document the UPR throughout development
following SeMet and hypersaline treatment. Furthermore, as mentioned
above concerning TBARS experiments, these gene expression studies
cannot discern between localized effects. Changes in transcription
in a few key cells may not result in a distinct difference in fold
change in qPCR.The UPR plays a key physiological role in development.[39] The IRE1a-XBP1 pathway has been shown to regulate
a variety of developmental processes, including plasma cell differentiation,[40] liver development,[41] chondrogenesis[42] and adipogenesis.[43] The PERK/ATF4 branch of the UPR has been found
to be involved in osteoblast formation.[44] BiP also plays a major role in development as BiP knockout mice
are not viable after the peri-implantation stage.[45] BiP has a much higher expression during neural development
than during adulthood.[45] The importance
of these responses has been found to be conserved in the medaka.[46] Recent work established that ATF6a/b results
in embryonic lethality in medaka, as in mice.[47] They found the physiological response to be strong at 2 days post
fertilization, where it was localized to the brain, otic vesicle and
notochord.[47] Perturbations in the physiological
ER stress response during embryogenesis may result in the inability
of the embryo to manage the high demand for protein folding. If the
perturbation is not stopped it could result in teratogenesis and embryo
lethality. Lordosis, kyphosis, and craniofacial abnormalities were
the primary forms of teratogenesis documented in this study. Considering
the studies above illustrating the role of the UPR in the development
of the notochord and cartilage, it is possible that UPR disruption
may be generating the deformities witnessed here.Apoptosis
is one common outcome generated by the UPR.[18] We had hypothesized that apoptosis played a
significant role leading to embryo lethality generated by SeMet. However,
we observed no evidence of apoptosis in our embryos. Neither BAX nor
CASP3A gene expression were changed by SeMet treatment. Wu et al.[34] demonstrated that 5 μM MSA was able to
cause apoptosis following UPR induction in PC-3 cells. However, MSA
is highly redox reactive and not a natural form of Se in the fish
diet. BiP has been shown to be a negative regulator of apoptosis,[18] so the high levels of BiP mRNA induction observed
may indicate a repression of apoptosis. Autophagy is another well-documented
outcome from UPR,[48] and may also contribute
to the deformities and reduction of hatch observed.The comparison
of apoptosis taken at 12hpf and 24hpf clearly shows
that these important processes fluctuate greatly during development.
Indeed, apoptosis has been shown to fluctuate in tissue-specific patterns
throughout Japanese medaka development, occurring mostly in the head,
spinal column, and tailbud.[49] Furthermore,
apoptosis plays a key role in neural development.[50]The overwhelming evidence for changes in apoptosis,
oxidative stress,
and the UPR throughout development, indicates that developing Japanese
medaka embryos have important windows of susceptibility to SeMet and
hypersaline stress. Thus, while the roles of oxidative stress and
apoptosis in the developmental toxicity of SeMet may be limited from
12 to 24 h, they may be increased as the oxidation state of the embryos
increases, or as apoptosis is more active at later stages of development.
It is important to map these processes throughout embryogenesis, so
that we may better understand the developmental toxicity of SeMet
and hypersaline conditions.In summary, hypersaline conditions
derived from the San Joaquin
River Valley, CA, enhanced the toxicity of SeMet in the developing
medaka embryo. While the UPR may have played a role, oxidative stress
and apoptosis measured in the whole embryo were not associated with
SeMet induced mortality and teratogenesis at this early stage. Additional
studies will further consider the role of oxidative stress and the
UPR throughout medaka development and investigate developmental periods
most susceptible to SeMet and hypersaline toxicity.Effects of combined exposure
of SeMet (50 μM) and hypersaline
conditions on BiP, ATF6, and ATF4 transcripts in Japanese medaka embryos
after 12 and 24 hpf. (A) Expression of BiP, ATF6, and ATF4 in whole
embryos at 12hpf and 24hpf in freshwater. Expression of (B) BiP, (C)
ATF6, and (D) ATF4 in 24hpf control embryos and SeMet treated embryos
in freshwater and saltwater. Each value represents the mean ±
SE of 5–10 replicates. EF1-α was run as a housekeeping
gene. Statistical significance is indicated by differing letters (Two-way
ANOVA, Tukey HSD Test p ≤ 0.05).
Authors: A M Reimold; N N Iwakoshi; J Manis; P Vallabhajosyula; E Szomolanyi-Tsuda; E M Gravallese; D Friend; M J Grusby; F Alt; L H Glimcher Journal: Nature Date: 2001-07-19 Impact factor: 49.962