| Literature DB >> 33487605 |
Yasumitsu Masuda1, Ryo Hasebe2, Yasushi Kuromi2, Masayoshi Kobayashi2, Misaki Iwamoto3, Mitsugu Hishinuma3, Tetsuya Ohbayashi4, Ryo Nishimura3.
Abstract
While embryo transfer (ET) is widely practiced, many of the transferred embryos fail to develop in cattle. To establish a more effective method for selecting bovine embryos for ET, here we quantified morphological parameters of living embryos using three-dimensional (3D) images non-invasively captured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Seven Japanese Black embryos produced by in vitro fertilization that had reached the expanded blastocyst stage after 7 days of culture were transferred after imaged by OCT. Twenty-two parameters, including thickness and volumes of the inner cell mass, trophectoderm, and zona pellucida, and volumes of blastocoel and whole embryo, were quantified from 3D images. Four of the seven recipients became pregnant. We suggest that these 22 parameters can be potentially employed to evaluate the quality of bovine embryos before ET.Entities:
Keywords: 3D image; Blastocyst bovine embryo transfer; Embryo evaluation; Optical coherence tomography; Quantification of embryo structures
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33487605 PMCID: PMC8075722 DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2020-151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Dev ISSN: 0916-8818 Impact factor: 2.214
Fig. 1.Scanning scale for bovine embryo. Longitudinal imaging was performed in the area of bovine embryo.
Fig. 2.Optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of a transferred bovine embryo (embryo No. 2 in Table 1). (A) Transferred embryo imaged by a microscope. This embryo was determined as Code 1 according to the IETS codes. (B) Sum of all pixel values in z-stack images of trophectoderm (TE; cyan) and inner cell mass (ICM; magenta) part was extracted from the tomographic image and synthesized 2D image. (C) 3D visualization of structures of an embryo, including ICM (red), TE (blue), zona pellucida (ZP; gray), and blastocoel. (D–F) 3D visualization of each structure of an embryo: ICM (D), TE (E), and blastocoel (F).
Quantification of 22 parameters in bovine embryo (n = 7)
| Embryo No. | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | mean ± SD | ||
| Structual thickness (μm) | |||||||||
| ICM | Mean | 38.1 | 56.2 | 42.2 | 53.2 | 51.8 | 59.9 | 55.2 | 50.9 ± 7.3 |
| Median | 38.0 | 57.1 | 43.1 | 55.0 | 55.1 | 61.3 | 56.2 | 52.3 ± 7.8 | |
| SD | 5.9 | 8.2 | 5.5 | 7.4 | 9.1 | 8.5 | 7.1 | 7.4 ± 1.3 | |
| TE | Mean | 3.1 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 5.0 | 4.7 | 3.0 | 3.8 ± 0.8 |
| Median | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | |
| SD | 2.4 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 3.6 ± 0.9 | |
| ZP | Mean | 16.4 | 14.9 | 16.6 | 13.3 | 11.4 | 13.8 | 13.6 | 14.3 ± 1.7 |
| Median | 17.0 | 15.4 | 17.1 | 13.4 | 12.0 | 15.0 | 14.3 | 14.9 ± 1.7 | |
| SD | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | |
| TE + ZP | Mean | 19.7 | 19.4 | 19.6 | 17.7 | 16.7 | 19.8 | 17.9 | 18.7 ± 1.2 |
| Median | 19.9 | 19.0 | 19.5 | 17.0 | 15.1 | 19.1 | 18.0 | 18.2 ± 1.6 | |
| SD | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 4.1 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | |
| Volume (× 105 μm3) | |||||||||
| ICM | 2.5 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.2 ± 0.4 | |
| TE | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 ± 0.6 | |
| ZP | 16.2 | 14.4 | 20.0 | 13.7 | 11.9 | 14.8 | 13.9 | 15.0 ± 0.2 | |
| TE + ZP | 17.5 | 17.4 | 21.4 | 16.0 | 15.5 | 18.1 | 16.0 | 17.4 ± 1.9 | |
| ICM + TE + ZP | 20.0 | 20.5 | 24.1 | 19.6 | 19.2 | 21.5 | 19.5 | 20.6 ± 1.6 | |
| Blastocoel | 11.4 | 11.3 | 18.1 | 12.0 | 13.8 | 11.5 | 11.2 | 12.8 ± 2.3 | |
| Whole embryo | 31.4 | 31.9 | 42.2 | 31.5 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 30.7 | 33.4 ± 3.7 | |
| Diameter of blastocoel (μm) | |||||||||
| Mean | 49.3 | 50.7 | 57.6 | 50.7 | 53.2 | 50.3 | 50.4 | 51.7 ± 2.6 | |
| Median | 51.6 | 52.7 | 60.3 | 52.9 | 55.7 | 52.5 | 52.4 | 54.0 ± 2.8 | |
| SD | 13.3 | 14.5 | 15.6 | 14.1 | 14.8 | 14.1 | 14.5 | 14.4 ± 0.7 | |
| ET status | |||||||||
| IETS Code | Code 1 | Code 1 | Code 1 | Code 1 | Code 1 | Code 1 | Code 1 | ||
| Pregnancy | – | + | + | + | – | + | – | ||
ICM, inner cell mass; TE, trophectoderm; ZP, zona pellucida.
Fig. 3.3D image analysis of bovine embryos. The binarized image was separated into inner cell mass (ICM), trophectoderm (TE), and zona pellucida (ZP). (Panels A & a) Thickness of embryo (T) was measured by drawing vectors from center to outer surface and inner surface (the outermost of blastocoel) of the embryo. ICM parts (Panels C & c) were extracted from T by the Otsu’s thresholding method [29, 30]. (Panels B & b) The parts that remained after removing ICM parts from T were defined as T. T were separated using the Otsu’s thresholding method into TE (Panels D & d) and ZP (Panels E & e) by calculating their average thickness [29, 30]. A–E: A 2D image derived from a binarized 3D image. a–e: Sinusoidal projections for each part of a 3D image. TH: Threshold of ZP.