Literature DB >> 24854206

Extent of lymph node dissection at nephrectomy affects cancer-specific survival and metastatic progression in specific sub-categories of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Umberto Capitanio1, Nazareno Suardi, Rayan Matloob, Marco Roscigno, Firas Abdollah, Ettore Di Trapani, Marco Moschini, Andrea Gallina, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Roberto Bertini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test whether the number of lymph nodes removed affects cancer-specific survival (CSS) or metastatic progression-free survival (MPFS) in different renal cell carcinoma (RCC) scenarios.
METHODS: We used Cox regression analyses to analyse the effect of the number of lymph nodes removed on CSS and MPFS in 1983 patients with RCC treated with nephrectomy. To adjust for possible clinical and surgical selection bias, analyses were further adjusted for number of positive nodes, presence of metastases, age, performance status, T stage, tumour size and grade.
RESULTS: The prevalence of lymph node invasion was 6.1%. The mean follow-up period was 83.3 months. Multivariable analyses showed that the number of nodes removed had an independent, protective effect on CSS in patients with pT2a-pT2b or pT3c-pT4 RCC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, P = 0.008 and HR 0.89, P < 0.001, respectively), in patients with bulky tumours (tumour size >10 cm, HR 0.97, P = 0.03) or when sarcomatoid features were found (HR 0.81, P = 0.006). The removal of each additional lymph node was associated with a 3-19% increase in CSS. When considering MPFS as an endpoint, the number of nodes removed had an independent, protective effect in the same patient categories.
CONCLUSIONS: When clinically indicated, the number of nodes removed affects CSS and MPFS in specific sub-categories of patients with RCC.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer-specific survival; kidney cancer; lymph node dissection; lymph node invasion; lymphadenectomy; metastases; metastases progression-free survival; renal cell carcinoma; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24854206     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  20 in total

1.  Valuation of lymph node dissection in localized high-risk renal cell cancer using X-tile software.

Authors:  Wei Zhuang; Jiabi Chen; Yining Li; Weihui Liu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  [Standard surgery for small renal masses (<4 cm)].

Authors:  S K Frees; R Mager; H Borgmann; W Jäger; C Thomas; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Accuracy of clinical nodal staging and factors associated with receipt of lymph node dissection at the time of surgery for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kushan D Radadia; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Sinae Kim; Nicholas J Farber; Joshua Sterling; Marissa Falkiewicz; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Extent of lymph node dissection improves overall survival in pT3N0 non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with radical nephrectomy: a propensity score-based analysis.

Authors:  Yubin Wei; Maofeng Wang; Yili Jin; Changchun Zhou; Jia Lyu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for High Risk, Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of the ASSURE (ECOG-ACRIN 2805) Adjuvant Trial.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Judi Manola; Naomi B Haas; Daniel Y C Heng; Edward M Messing; Christopher G Wood; Christopher J Kane; Robert S DiPaola; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  The rationale and the role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  The contemporary role of lymph node dissection in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Jehonathan H Pinthus; Paul Russo
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-08-20

Review 8.  Management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus in locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sarah P Psutka; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-08

9.  Lymphadenopathies in patients with renal cell carcinoma: clinical and pathological predictors of pathologically confirmed lymph node invasion.

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Federico Deho'; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Alessandro Larcher; Paolo Capogrosso; Alessandro Nini; Cristina Carenzi; Massimo Freschi; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Salonia; Francesco Montorsi; Roberto Bertini
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Improving outcomes in high-risk, nonmetastatic renal cancer: new data and ongoing trials.

Authors:  Chris Blick; Alastair W S Ritchie; Timothy Eisen; Grant D Stewart
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.