Literature DB >> 30344645

The contemporary role of lymph node dissection in the management of renal cell carcinoma.

Piotr Zareba1, Jehonathan H Pinthus2, Paul Russo3.   

Abstract

The appropriate role of lymph node dissection (LND) in the management of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is still a matter of debate. There is ample evidence that LND is the most accurate modality for staging the regional lymph nodes (LNs), which may harbor metastatic disease in greater than one-third of patients with high-risk RCC. The presence of LN metastases is an independent negative prognostic factor in this disease and accurate determination of LN status not only helps with patient counselling regarding prognosis and tailoring of postoperative surveillance schedules, but it also identifies patients at high risk of systemic disease recurrence who may qualify for clinical trials of adjuvant systemic therapies. Meanwhile, the therapeutic value of LND has been brought into question by a randomized trial (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; EORTC 30881) that showed no difference in progression-free or overall survival between patients who were treated with radical nephrectomy (RN) and LND and those treated with RN alone. Given that most patients enrolled in this trial had small renal masses and therefore were at low risk for LN metastases, the question of whether patients with high-risk tumors derive a therapeutic benefit from a standardized, extended LND remains unanswered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymph node dissection; renal cell carcinoma

Year:  2018        PMID: 30344645      PMCID: PMC6180379          DOI: 10.1177/1756287218794094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Urol        ISSN: 1756-2872


  47 in total

1.  European temporal trends in the use of lymph node dissection in patients with renal cancer.

Authors:  U Capitanio; G D Stewart; A Larcher; I Ouzaid; B Akdogan; M Roscigno; M Marszalek; P Dell'Oglio; M Salagierski; A Volpe; M C Mir; M Kriegmair; C Terrone; S D Brookman-May; F Montorsi; T Klatte
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Mortality trends and the impact of lymphadenectomy on survival for renal cell carcinoma patients with distant metastasis.

Authors:  Hiten D Patel; Michael A Gorin; Natasha Gupta; Max Kates; Michael H Johnson; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Long-term survival rates after resection for locally advanced kidney cancer: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 1989 to 2012 experience.

Authors:  Wassim M Bazzi; Daniel D Sjoberg; Michael A Feuerstein; Alexandra Maschino; Sweeney Verma; Melanie Bernstein; Matthew F O'Brien; Thomas Jang; William Lowrance; Robert J Motzer; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Oncological control associated with surgical resection of isolated retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher M Russell; Kathy Lue; John Fisher; Wassim Kassouf; Thomas Schwaab; Wade J Sexton; Simon Tanguay; Sarah P Psutka; Robert Houston Thompson; Bradley C Leibovich; Michael I Hanzly; Philippe E Spiess; Stephen A Boorjian
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Lymph Node Dissection is Not Associated with Improved Survival among Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Based Analysis.

Authors:  Boris Gershman; R Houston Thompson; Daniel M Moreira; Stephen A Boorjian; Christine M Lohse; Brian A Costello; John C Cheville; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A protocol for performing extended lymph node dissection using primary tumor pathological features for patients treated with radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael L Blute; Bradley C Leibovich; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Radical Nephrectomy With or Without Lymph Node Dissection for Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-based Analysis.

Authors:  Boris Gershman; R Houston Thompson; Daniel M Moreira; Stephen A Boorjian; Matthew K Tollefson; Christine M Lohse; Brian A Costello; John C Cheville; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Prognostic significance of lymph node invasion in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a population-based perspective.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Umberto Capitanio; Claudio Jeldres; Hendrik Isbarn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Philippe Arjane; Hugues Widmer; Paul Perrotte; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Impact of micrometastases in the sentinel node of patients with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora M Hansen; Baiba Grube; Xing Ye; Roderick R Turner; R James Brenner; Myung-Shin Sim; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Detection of micrometastases by flow cytometry in sentinel lymph nodes from patients with renal tumours.

Authors:  Ciputra Adijaya Hartana; Johan Kinn; Robert Rosenblatt; Stefan Anania; Farhood Alamdari; Hans Glise; Amir Sherif; Ola Winqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dissecting the role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Alain Kaldany; Zev R Leopold; Juliana E Kim; Hiren V Patel; Arnav Srivastava; Alexandra L Tabakin; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Kidney Cancer J       Date:  2020-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.