Literature DB >> 29468282

[Standard surgery for small renal masses (<4 cm)].

S K Frees1, R Mager2, H Borgmann2, W Jäger2, C Thomas2, A Haferkamp2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several new treatment strategies have emerged in the treatment of small renal masses (<4 cm in diameter). Active surveillance and ablative techniques have been introduced but it remains unclear which patients will benefit the most from these new treatment options. A surgical approach remains standard of care. In recent decades, radical nephrectomy has been replaced by nephron-sparing surgery for the management of small renal masses.
RESULTS: In addition to the open partial nephrectomy, which is considered the standard approach, the number of surgeries performed using minimally invasive techniques is increasing. Recent data show that there might be some benefits such as less blood loss. The disadvantages shown by laparoscopic partial nephrectomy such as prolonged warm ischemia, longer operation times, and postoperative renal impairment might be negligible for the robotic approach. Therefore, current guidelines allow these approaches in addition to open partial nephrectomy if sufficient surgical expertise is given.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic surgical procedures; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Nephrectomy, radical; Resection; Robotic surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29468282     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0583-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  43 in total

1.  The benefit of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in high body mass index patients.

Authors:  Gou Kaneko; Akira Miyajima; Eiji Kikuchi; Ken Nakagawa; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  External validation of a model for tailoring the operative approach to minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Gino J Vricella; Sunshine Murray; Nicholas A Boncher; Rabii Madi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  A comparison of pathologic outcomes of matched robotic and open partial nephrectomies.

Authors:  Matthew J Mellon; Steven M Lucas; Jennifer B J Kum; Liang Cheng; Chandru Sundaram
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Treatment of Patients with Positive Margins after Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Simon P Kim; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Robotic partial nephrectomy with superselective versus main artery clamping: a retrospective comparison.

Authors:  Mihir M Desai; Andre Luis de Castro Abreu; Scott Leslie; Jei Cai; Eric Yi-Hsiu Huang; Pierre-Marie Lewandowski; Dennis Lee; Arjuna Dharmaraja; Andre K Berger; Alvin Goh; Osamu Ukimura; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Brian R Lane; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Amr Fergany; Igor Frank; Inderbir S Gill; Michael L Blute; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian Gratzke; Michael Seitz; Florian Bayrle; Boris Schlenker; Patrick J Bastian; Niko Haseke; Markus Bader; Derya Tilki; Alexander Roosen; Alexander Karl; Oliver Reich; Wael Y Khoder; Stephen Wyler; Christian G Stief; Michael Staehler; Alexander Bachmann
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with temporary arterial occlusion: description of technique and renal functional outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; Joseph A Mitchell; Maxwell V Meng; Jason Anast; Peter R Carroll; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors--is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes?

Authors:  William C Huang; Elena B Elkin; Andrew S Levey; Thomas L Jang; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Positive Surgical Margins Increase Risk of Recurrence after Partial Nephrectomy for High Risk Renal Tumors.

Authors:  Paras H Shah; Daniel M Moreira; Zhamshid Okhunov; Vinay R Patel; Sameer Chopra; Aria A Razmaria; Manaf Alom; Arvin K George; Oksana Yaskiv; Michael J Schwartz; Mihir Desai; Manish A Vira; Lee Richstone; Jaime Landman; Arieh L Shalhav; Inderbir Gill; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 7.600

View more
  1 in total

1.  A retrospective study of open and endoscopic nephron sparing surgery in the treatment of complex renal tumors.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Li; Jia Feng; Yan-Ling Li; Qian Sun
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.