S K Frees1, R Mager2, H Borgmann2, W Jäger2, C Thomas2, A Haferkamp2. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. sebastian.frees@unimedizin-mainz.de. 2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several new treatment strategies have emerged in the treatment of small renal masses (<4 cm in diameter). Active surveillance and ablative techniques have been introduced but it remains unclear which patients will benefit the most from these new treatment options. A surgical approach remains standard of care. In recent decades, radical nephrectomy has been replaced by nephron-sparing surgery for the management of small renal masses. RESULTS: In addition to the open partial nephrectomy, which is considered the standard approach, the number of surgeries performed using minimally invasive techniques is increasing. Recent data show that there might be some benefits such as less blood loss. The disadvantages shown by laparoscopic partial nephrectomy such as prolonged warm ischemia, longer operation times, and postoperative renal impairment might be negligible for the robotic approach. Therefore, current guidelines allow these approaches in addition to open partial nephrectomy if sufficient surgical expertise is given.
BACKGROUND: Several new treatment strategies have emerged in the treatment of small renal masses (<4 cm in diameter). Active surveillance and ablative techniques have been introduced but it remains unclear which patients will benefit the most from these new treatment options. A surgical approach remains standard of care. In recent decades, radical nephrectomy has been replaced by nephron-sparing surgery for the management of small renal masses. RESULTS: In addition to the open partial nephrectomy, which is considered the standard approach, the number of surgeries performed using minimally invasive techniques is increasing. Recent data show that there might be some benefits such as less blood loss. The disadvantages shown by laparoscopic partial nephrectomy such as prolonged warm ischemia, longer operation times, and postoperative renal impairment might be negligible for the robotic approach. Therefore, current guidelines allow these approaches in addition to open partial nephrectomy if sufficient surgical expertise is given.
Authors: Matthew J Mellon; Steven M Lucas; Jennifer B J Kum; Liang Cheng; Chandru Sundaram Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Mihir M Desai; Andre Luis de Castro Abreu; Scott Leslie; Jei Cai; Eric Yi-Hsiu Huang; Pierre-Marie Lewandowski; Dennis Lee; Arjuna Dharmaraja; Andre K Berger; Alvin Goh; Osamu Ukimura; Monish Aron; Inderbir S Gill Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: R Houston Thompson; Brian R Lane; Christine M Lohse; Bradley C Leibovich; Amr Fergany; Igor Frank; Inderbir S Gill; Michael L Blute; Steven C Campbell Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Christian Gratzke; Michael Seitz; Florian Bayrle; Boris Schlenker; Patrick J Bastian; Niko Haseke; Markus Bader; Derya Tilki; Alexander Roosen; Alexander Karl; Oliver Reich; Wael Y Khoder; Stephen Wyler; Christian G Stief; Michael Staehler; Alexander Bachmann Journal: BJU Int Date: 2009-02-23 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Christopher J Kane; Joseph A Mitchell; Maxwell V Meng; Jason Anast; Peter R Carroll; Marshall L Stoller Journal: Urology Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Paras H Shah; Daniel M Moreira; Zhamshid Okhunov; Vinay R Patel; Sameer Chopra; Aria A Razmaria; Manaf Alom; Arvin K George; Oksana Yaskiv; Michael J Schwartz; Mihir Desai; Manish A Vira; Lee Richstone; Jaime Landman; Arieh L Shalhav; Inderbir Gill; Louis R Kavoussi Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 7.600