John J Norcini1, John R Boulet, Amy Opalek, W Dale Dauphinee. 1. Dr. Norcini is president and chief executive officer, Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dr. Boulet is associate vice president for research and data resources, Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Ms. Opalek is information scientist, Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dr. Dauphinee is senior scholar, Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) examination of the United States Medical Licensing Examination sequence is a requirement for the certification of international medical graduates (IMGs) by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. An association between scores on the test and the quality of care later provided by those who take it is central to its use in certification and licensure. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between scores on Step 2 CK and patient outcomes for IMGs. METHOD: This is a retrospective observational study of the 60,958 hospitalizations from 2003 to 2009 in Pennsylvania where the principal diagnosis was acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure and the attending physician (N = 2,525) was an IMG who had taken the Step 2 CK. The main measures were the three-digit scores on Step 2 CK and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: After adjustment for severity of illness, physician characteristics, and hospital characteristics, performance on Step 2 CK had a statistically significant inverse relationship with mortality. Each additional point on the examination was associated with a 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.4%) decrease in mortality. The size of the effect is noteworthy, with each standard deviation (roughly 20 points) equivalent to a 4% change in mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence for the validity of Step 2 CK scores. Given the magnitude of its relationship with patient outcomes, the results support the use of the examination as an effective screening strategy for licensure.
PURPOSE: The Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) examination of the United States Medical Licensing Examination sequence is a requirement for the certification of international medical graduates (IMGs) by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. An association between scores on the test and the quality of care later provided by those who take it is central to its use in certification and licensure. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between scores on Step 2 CK and patient outcomes for IMGs. METHOD: This is a retrospective observational study of the 60,958 hospitalizations from 2003 to 2009 in Pennsylvania where the principal diagnosis was acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure and the attending physician (N = 2,525) was an IMG who had taken the Step 2 CK. The main measures were the three-digit scores on Step 2 CK and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: After adjustment for severity of illness, physician characteristics, and hospital characteristics, performance on Step 2 CK had a statistically significant inverse relationship with mortality. Each additional point on the examination was associated with a 0.2% (95% CI: 0.1%-0.4%) decrease in mortality. The size of the effect is noteworthy, with each standard deviation (roughly 20 points) equivalent to a 4% change in mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence for the validity of Step 2 CK scores. Given the magnitude of its relationship with patient outcomes, the results support the use of the examination as an effective screening strategy for licensure.
Authors: Daniel Jurich; Sally A Santen; Miguel Paniagua; Amy Fleming; Victoria Harnik; Arnyce Pock; Aubrie Swan-Sein; Michael A Barone; Michelle Daniel Journal: Acad Med Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Richard Wakeford; MeiLing Denney; Katarzyna Ludka-Stempien; Jane Dacre; I C McManus Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Stanley J Hamstra; Monica M Cuddy; Daniel Jurich; Kenji Yamazaki; John Burkhardt; Eric S Holmboe; Michael A Barone; Sally A Santen Journal: Acad Med Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 7.840
Authors: Julian Archer; Nick Lynn; Lee Coombes; Martin Roberts; Tom Gale; Tristan Price; Sam Regan de Bere Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 2.463