BACKGROUND: Dissemination and implementation (D&I) research seeks to understand and overcome barriers to adoption of behavioral interventions that address complex problems, specifically interventions that arise from multiple interacting influences crossing socio-ecological levels. It is often difficult for research to accurately represent and address the complexities of the real world, and traditional methodological approaches are generally inadequate for this task. Systems science methods, expressly designed to study complex systems, can be effectively employed for an improved understanding about dissemination and implementation of evidence-based interventions. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to understand the complex factors influencing successful D&I of programs in community settings and to identify D&I challenges imposed by system complexity. METHOD: Case examples of three systems science methods-system dynamics modeling, agent-based modeling, and network analysis-are used to illustrate how each method can be used to address D&I challenges. RESULTS: The case studies feature relevant behavioral topical areas: chronic disease prevention, community violence prevention, and educational intervention. To emphasize consistency with D&I priorities, the discussion of the value of each method is framed around the elements of the established Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. CONCLUSION: Systems science methods can help researchers, public health decision makers, and program implementers to understand the complex factors influencing successful D&I of programs in community settings and to identify D&I challenges imposed by system complexity.
BACKGROUND: Dissemination and implementation (D&I) research seeks to understand and overcome barriers to adoption of behavioral interventions that address complex problems, specifically interventions that arise from multiple interacting influences crossing socio-ecological levels. It is often difficult for research to accurately represent and address the complexities of the real world, and traditional methodological approaches are generally inadequate for this task. Systems science methods, expressly designed to study complex systems, can be effectively employed for an improved understanding about dissemination and implementation of evidence-based interventions. PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to understand the complex factors influencing successful D&I of programs in community settings and to identify D&I challenges imposed by system complexity. METHOD: Case examples of three systems science methods-system dynamics modeling, agent-based modeling, and network analysis-are used to illustrate how each method can be used to address D&I challenges. RESULTS: The case studies feature relevant behavioral topical areas: chronic disease prevention, community violence prevention, and educational intervention. To emphasize consistency with D&I priorities, the discussion of the value of each method is framed around the elements of the established Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. CONCLUSION: Systems science methods can help researchers, public health decision makers, and program implementers to understand the complex factors influencing successful D&I of programs in community settings and to identify D&I challenges imposed by system complexity.
Authors: Michael A Yonas; Jessica G Burke; Shawn T Brown; Jeffrey D Borrebach; Richard Garland; Donald S Burke; John J Grefenstette Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2013-10
Authors: Shawn T Brown; Julie H Y Tai; Rachel R Bailey; Philip C Cooley; William D Wheaton; Margaret A Potter; Ronald E Voorhees; Megan LeJeune; John J Grefenstette; Donald S Burke; Sarah M McGlone; Bruce Y Lee Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Eunlye Lee; Jarrod Dalton; David Ngendahimana; Pat Bebo; Ashley Davis; Daniel Remley; Carol Smathers; Darcy A Freedman Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Leah Frerichs; Natalie R Smith; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Todd K BenDor; Kelly R Evenson Journal: Health Place Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Yan Li; Norma A Padrón; Anil T Mangla; Pamela G Russo; Thomas Schlenker; José A Pagán Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Brent A Langellier; Usama Bilal; Felipe Montes; Jose D Meisel; Letícia de Oliveira Cardoso; Ross A Hammond Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Byron J Powell; Sheila V Patel; Amber D Haley; Emily R Haines; Kathleen E Knocke; Shira Chandler; Colleen Cary Katz; Heather Pane Seifert; George Ake; Lisa Amaya-Jackson; Gregory A Aarons Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2020-09
Authors: Karriem S Watson; Vida Henderson; Marcus Murray; Adam B Murphy; Josef Ben Levi; Tiffany McDowell; Alfreda Holloway-Beth; Pooja Gogana; Michael A Dixon; LeAndre Moore; Ivanhoe Hall; Alexander Kimbrough; Yamilé Molina; Robert A Winn Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2019