Literature DB >> 24850894

Fitness consequences of spousal relatedness in 46 small-scale societies.

Drew H Bailey1, Kim R Hill2, Robert S Walker3.   

Abstract

Social norms that regulate reproductive and marital decisions generate impressive cross-cultural variation in the prevalence of kin marriages. In some societies, marriages among kin are the norm and this inbreeding creates intensive kinship networks concentrated within communities. In others, especially forager societies, most marriages are between more genealogically and geographically distant individuals, which generates a larger number of kin and affines of lesser relatedness in more extensive kinship networks spread out over multiple communities. Here, we investigate the fitness consequence of kin marriages across a sample of 46 small-scale societies (12,439 marriages). Results show that some non-forager societies (including horticulturalists, agriculturalists and pastoralists), but not foragers, have intensive kinship societies where fitness outcomes (measured as the number of surviving children in genealogies) peak at commonly high levels of spousal relatedness. By contrast, the extensive kinship systems of foragers have worse fitness outcomes at high levels of spousal relatedness. Overall, societies with greater levels of inbreeding showed a more positive relationship between fitness and spousal relatedness.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agriculture; fertility; foragers; human kinship; marriage patterns; subsistence

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24850894      PMCID: PMC4046372          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

Review 1.  Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility?

Authors:  A H Bittles; J C Grant; S G Sullivan; R Hussain
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.533

2.  Hunter-gatherer populations and archaeological inference.

Authors:  J Yellen; H Harpending
Journal:  World Archaeol       Date:  1972-10

3.  Causes, consequences, and kin bias of human group fissions.

Authors:  Robert S Walker; Kim R Hill
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-12

4.  Marrying kin in small-scale societies.

Authors:  Robert S Walker; Drew H Bailey
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 1.937

5.  Comparative rates of violence in chimpanzees and humans.

Authors:  Richard W Wrangham; Michael L Wilson; Martin N Muller
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 2.163

6.  Parental choice: what parents want in a son-in-law and a daughter-in-law across 67 pre-industrial societies.

Authors:  Menelaos Apostolou
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2009-12-18

7.  Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure.

Authors:  Kim R Hill; Robert S Walker; Miran Bozicević; James Eder; Thomas Headland; Barry Hewlett; A Magdalena Hurtado; Frank Marlowe; Polly Wiessner; Brian Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies.

Authors:  Monique Borgerhoff Mulder; Samuel Bowles; Tom Hertz; Adrian Bell; Jan Beise; Greg Clark; Ila Fazzio; Michael Gurven; Kim Hill; Paul L Hooper; William Irons; Hillard Kaplan; Donna Leonetti; Bobbi Low; Frank Marlowe; Richard McElreath; Suresh Naidu; David Nolin; Patrizio Piraino; Rob Quinlan; Eric Schniter; Rebecca Sear; Mary Shenk; Eric Alden Smith; Christopher von Rueden; Polly Wiessner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases.

Authors:  A H Bittles; M L Black
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  An association between the kinship and fertility of human couples.

Authors:  Agnar Helgason; Saebjörn Pálsson; Daníel F Gudbjartsson; Thornórdur Kristjánsson; Kári Stefánsson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; Ewan O Flintham; Alex Mas-Sandoval; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Co-father relationships among the Suruí (Paiter) of Brazil.

Authors:  Robert S Walker; Cédric Yvinec; Ryan M Ellsworth; Drew H Bailey
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.