Literature DB >> 24677264

Marrying kin in small-scale societies.

Robert S Walker1, Drew H Bailey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Marriages among kin have the dual effect of both increasing average group relatedness as well as reducing the total number of kin by eliminating more genealogically and geographically distant individuals from kinship networks. Marriage decisions therefore face a tradeoff between density of kin, or formation of intensive kinship systems, and the diversity of kin, or extensive kinship systems. This article tests the hypothesis that extensive kinship systems best characterize hunter-gatherer societies, whereas more intensive forms of subsistence, like horticultural, agricultural, and pastoral economies, are more likely to have intensive kinship systems.
METHODS: Here, we investigate the wide range of variation in prevalence of kin marriages across a sample of 46 small-scale societies, split evenly between hunter-gatherers and agropastoralists (including horticulturalists), using genealogies that range in depth from 4 to 16 generations. Regression methods examine how subsistence and polygyny relate to spousal relatedness and inbreeding across societies.
RESULTS: On average, hunter-gatherers show limited numbers of kin marriages and low levels of inbreeding, whereas some agropastoralists are characterized by much higher levels of both, especially in societies where polygynous marriages are more common.
CONCLUSION: Intensive kinship systems emerge in some intensive economies. This pattern may have favored a kin-selected increase in more large-scale cooperation and inequality occurring relatively recently in human history after the advent of domesticated plants and animals.
Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24677264     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  6 in total

1.  Fitness consequences of spousal relatedness in 46 small-scale societies.

Authors:  Drew H Bailey; Kim R Hill; Robert S Walker
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Pama-Nyungan grandparent systems change with grandchildren, but not cross-cousin terms or social norms.

Authors:  Catherine Sheard; Claire Bowern; Rikker Dockum; Fiona M Jordan
Journal:  Evol Hum Sci       Date:  2020-06-05

3.  Impact of Genetic Counseling and Testing on Altruistic Motivations to Test for BRCA1/2: a Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Rahul Garg; Joseph Vogelgesang; Kimberly Kelly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Cross-cousin marriage among the Yanomamö shows evidence of parent-offspring conflict and mate competition between brothers.

Authors:  Napoleon A Chagnon; Robert F Lynch; Mary K Shenk; Raymond Hames; Mark V Flinn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Polygyny without wealth: popularity in gift games predicts polygyny in BaYaka Pygmies.

Authors:  Nikhil Chaudhary; Gul Deniz Salali; James Thompson; Mark Dyble; Abigail Page; Daniel Smith; Ruth Mace; Andrea Bamberg Migliano
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Co-father relationships among the Suruí (Paiter) of Brazil.

Authors:  Robert S Walker; Cédric Yvinec; Ryan M Ellsworth; Drew H Bailey
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.