Mononuclear nonheme Fe(II) (MNH) and α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) dependent halogenases activate O2 to perform oxidative halogenations of activated and nonactivated carbon centers. While the mechanism of halide incorporation into a substrate has been investigated, the mechanism by which halogenases prevent oxidations in the absence of chloride is still obscure. Here, we characterize the impact of chloride on the metal center coordination and reactivity of the fatty acyl-halogenase HctB. Stopped-flow kinetic studies show that the oxidative transformation of the Fe(II)-α-KG-enzyme complex is >200-fold accelerated by saturating concentrations of chloride in both the absence and presence of a covalently bound substrate. By contrast, the presence of substrate, which generally brings about O2 activation at enzymatic MNH centers, only has an ∼10-fold effect in the absence of chloride. Circular dichroism (CD) and magnetic CD (MCD) studies demonstrate that chloride binding triggers changes in the metal center ligation: chloride binding induces the proper binding of the substrate as shown by variable-temperature, variable-field (VTVH) MCD studies of non-α-KG-containing forms and the conversion from six-coordinate (6C) to 5C/6C mixtures when α-KG is bound. In the presence of substrate, a site with square pyramidal five-coordinate (5C) geometry is observed, which is required for O2 activation at enzymatic MNH centers. In the absence of substrate an unusual trigonal bipyramidal site is formed, which accounts for the observed slow, uncoupled reactivity. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the binding of chloride to the metal center of HctB leads to a conformational change in the enzyme that makes the active site more accessible to the substrate and thus facilitates the formation of the catalytically competent enzyme-substrate complex. Results are discussed in relation to other MNH dependent halogenases.
Mononuclear nonheme Fe(II) (MNH) and α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) dependent halogenases activate O2 to perform oxidative halogenations of activated and nonactivated carbon centers. While the mechanism of halide incorporation into a substrate has been investigated, the mechanism by which halogenases prevent oxidations in the absence of chloride is still obscure. Here, we characterize the impact of chloride on the metal center coordination and reactivity of the fatty acyl-halogenase HctB. Stopped-flow kinetic studies show that the oxidative transformation of the Fe(II)-α-KG-enzyme complex is >200-fold accelerated by saturating concentrations of chloride in both the absence and presence of a covalently bound substrate. By contrast, the presence of substrate, which generally brings about O2 activation at enzymatic MNH centers, only has an ∼10-fold effect in the absence of chloride. Circular dichroism (CD) and magnetic CD (MCD) studies demonstrate that chloride binding triggers changes in the metal center ligation: chloride binding induces the proper binding of the substrate as shown by variable-temperature, variable-field (VTVH) MCD studies of non-α-KG-containing forms and the conversion from six-coordinate (6C) to 5C/6C mixtures when α-KG is bound. In the presence of substrate, a site with square pyramidal five-coordinate (5C) geometry is observed, which is required for O2 activation at enzymatic MNH centers. In the absence of substrate an unusual trigonal bipyramidal site is formed, which accounts for the observed slow, uncoupled reactivity. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that the binding of chloride to the metal center of HctB leads to a conformational change in the enzyme that makes the active site more accessible to the substrate and thus facilitates the formation of the catalytically competent enzyme-substrate complex. Results are discussed in relation to other MNH dependent halogenases.
In nature, the selective
halogenation of nonactivated carbon atoms
is performed by mononuclear nonheme Fe(II) (MNH), O2, and
α-ketoglutaric acid (α-KG) dependent halogenases. The
structural rationale of this chemically challenging reaction has been
elucidated rather recently,[1−3] and to date only a handful of
MNH halogenases have been biochemically characterized.[4−11] The molecular mechanism of these halogenases follows, in principle,
that of the closely related α-KG dependent hydroxylases. The
α-KG-dependent hydroxylases have a reactive Fe(II) center coordinated
by a 2-His 1-carboxylate motif and three water ligands. Upon coordination
of the α-KG cofactor, two water molecules are replaced but the
six-coordinate (6C) geometry of the Fe(II) center is retained. Only
after substrate binding in the outer coordination sphere is the remaining
water ligand displaced from the Fe(II) center and the resulting five-coordinate
(5C) species is activated for reaction with O2.[12] The α-KG cofactor is decarboxylated by
the activated dioxygen species, which leads to the formation of a
high-spin Fe(IV)=O intermediate that abstracts a hydrogen atom
from the substrate.[13,14] While in MNH dependent hydroxylases
the reaction proceeds via transfer of the hydroxyl group from the
Fe(III)–OH intermediate onto the substrate radical, in halogenases
an iron-coordinated chloride replaces the carboxylate ligand and successfully
competes with the hydroxyl moiety to yield the halogenated product
(Scheme 1).
Scheme 1
Proposed Molecular Mechanism of Fe(II)
and α-KG Dependent Halogenation[13,14]
In the presence of α-KG
and substrate, O2 binds to the five-coordinate Fe(II) center
and decarboxylates the α-KG cofactor. This yields a highly reactive
Fe(IV)=O intermediate that abstracts a proton from the substrate.
Chloride rather than the hydroxyl moiety is rebound by the substrate
radical, resulting in a chlorinated reaction product.
Proposed Molecular Mechanism of Fe(II)
and α-KG Dependent Halogenation[13,14]
In the presence of α-KG
and substrate, O2 binds to the five-coordinate Fe(II) center
and decarboxylates the α-KG cofactor. This yields a highly reactive
Fe(IV)=O intermediate that abstracts a proton from the substrate.
Chloride rather than the hydroxyl moiety is rebound by the substrate
radical, resulting in a chlorinated reaction product.Several reasons have been invoked for the strong preference
of
halogenation over hydroxylation that has generally been observed in
halogenases:[4−6,10] (i) the lower redox
potential of Cl• compared to OH•;[15] (ii) possible bicarbonate formation
between the metal bound hydroxyl group and the α-KG derived
CO2 which prevents the transfer of the hydroxyl moiety;[16] (iii) possible protonation of the hydroxyl group
by a nearby Glu-Arg proton donor that results in the formation of
water, which makes hydroxylation unfavorable;[17] (iv) the difference in binding strengths of the chloride and hydroxyl
group to the metal ion and the resulting energetic barrier for hydroxylation;[18] or (v) the positioning of the substrate radical
relative to the Cl–Fe(III)–OH center.[19,20] Recently, it has been shown that the O2 reactivity of
the α-KG-bound halogenase SyrB2 results in a 5C trigonal bipyramidal
Fe(IV)=O intermediate with the Fe–O vector perpendicular
to the C–H bond of the substrate. H-atom abstraction by an
Fe(IV)=O π* molecular orbital leads to an intermediate
where the Fe(III)–OH moiety is oriented away from the substrate
carbon radical and the halide is primed for rebound halogenation.[21]While substantial efforts have been made
to investigate the second
half of the halogenases’ reaction in order to rationalize the
preference of substrate chlorination over hydroxylation after proton
abstraction, there has not been much focus on the first half of the
catalytic cycle. Chloride-bound crystal structures of the substrate-free
MNH halogenases SyrB2,[1] and CurA-Hal[3] show that the halide can coordinate to the iron
even before the substrate binds. On the other hand, in CytC3 no halide
is present in the crystal structure with Fe(II) and α-KG bound,
despite the rather high chloride concentrations in the mother liquor
(80 mM).[2] This suggests that halides are
not necessarily bound a priori. To date no study
has elucidated how the halogenases prevent alternative oxidation reactions
in the absence of halide.Recently, a fatty acyl-halogenase,
HctB from L. majuscula, has been characterized in
our laboratory.[11] The enzyme that modifies
middle-chain fatty acyl moieties displays
an unprecedented three domain organization, which sets it apart from
the monodomain amino acyl-halogenases and the multidomain ketide halogenases:
An acyl-Coenzyme A (acyl-CoA) binding protein is N-terminally fused
to a halogenase domain, while its C-terminus connects to an acyl-carrier
protein (ACP) domain. The ACP domain bears an inherent thiolation
site, where the substrate covalently binds via a phosphopantetheinyl
bridge. This composition makes HctB self-sufficient in regard to a
substrate binding entity and may be prototypical for fatty acyl-halogenases.
The trifunctional enzyme introduces 5-oxo-, 5,5-dichloro-, and 5-chloro-4-vinyl
moieties into the hexanoyl substrate under chloride saturating conditions.
In the course of the enzyme’s biochemical characterization
we observed that O2 reduction was triggered by the presence
of not only the substrate but also chloride under single turnover
conditions.[11]Based on these observations,
a suspected role of chloride in primary
O2 activation in HctB is investigated in this study: Circular
dichroism (CD), magnetic CD (MCD), and variable-temperature, variable-field
(VTVH) MCD spectroscopies directly observe the geometric and electronic
structure of the enzymatic Fe(II) active site. In combination with
stopped-flow kinetics the spectroscopic data reveal that the metal
center is constituted in the absence of a halide ion but remains inert
toward O2 and that the presence of chloride is essential
for triggering O2 reduction at the metal center. Molecular
dynamics (MD) simulations of the HctB halogenase domain are employed
to gain insights into the role of the protein structure in chloride-dependent
O2 activation.
Experimental Section
Protein
Production and Purification
Recombinant nonacylated
HctB was expressed, purified, and acylated with the fatty acyl-CoA
substrate as described previously[11] except
the final enzyme solution was exchanged into 20 mM Bis-Tris buffer
(pH 7.5) for stopped-flow analysis.
Stopped-Flow UV/Vis Spectrophotometric
Analysis
The
enzyme was made O2-free by ∼20 cycles of evacuation
and N2-flushing in an airtight V-Vial (Wheaton, Millville/USA)
capped with a screw-top septum (Supelco, Bellefonte/USA), and subsequently
0.95 equiv of Fe(II)SO4·7H2O and α-KG
(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis/USA) were added from stock solutions (10
mM) in a N2-purged glovebox. The enzyme preparations (440–550
μM active sites) were mixed at 10 °C with equal volumes
of 20 mM Bis-Tris buffer, pH 7.5 that contained ∼1.4 mM O2 if not stated otherwise and either 0.1 or 1 M NaCl if required,
using an SX20 Stopped-Flow UV/vis spectrophotometer (Applied Photophysics,
Leatherhead/UK), which was equipped with a polychromatic light source.
Note that in a previous study the addition of 1 equiv of α-KG
to acylated HctB (100 μM) yielded maximum initial O2 consumption rates and thus, in the enzyme kinetic measurements performed
here, which used ∼95% cofactor-loaded active sites (>100
μM),
saturating conditions were ensured.[11] Spectroscopic
analyses were carried out by using an SX20 photodiode array detector,
whereby absorptions from 270 to 730 nm were recorded with 400 collected
data points in the first 0.4 s and 1 datum point per 100 ms in the
remaining 40 or 60 s. Absorbance traces of ≥4 measurements
per condition were averaged and fit using the following methods: When
rates of signal changes were so slow that they had linear characteristics
over the monitored time, rates were determined based on the extinction
coefficient of the α-KG-Fe(II)-HctB complex
(ε500nm = 0.15 mM–1 cm–1).[11] Rates were then related to the applied
metal concentration to give specific rates. In the case of apparently
bi- or triphasic curves, the Pro-Kineticist 1.0.10 software (Applied
Photophysics) was used and the trace at the respective constant wavelength
was fit to sequential models in the form of A → B →
C and A → B → C → D respectively, in order to
obtain the respective apparent 1st order net rate constants.
CD/MCD Spectroscopy
If not stated otherwise, for CD/MCD
spectroscopy, protein samples were exchanged into deuterated 50 mM
HEPES/NaOD buffer pD 7.5, containing 1 M NaCl if required, using 4
mL Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filters and concentrated to 1.5–3.5
mM. O2 was removed from the samples by ∼20 cycles
of evacuation and argon flushing. Ferrous ammonium sulfate and α-KG
were added to the enzyme preparations in microliter quantities from
deuterated, anaerobic stock solutions in a N2-purged glovebox,
where the final sample was filled into a CD or MCD cell. CD measurements
were carried out on a Jasco J-730W spectropolarimeter at 283 K. Spectra
were corrected by subtracting the respective cofactor-free spectrum.
MCD samples were prepared from CD samples by adding glassing agent
to saturation at approximately 50% sucrose. Samples were injected
into MCD cells, frozen, and stored in liquid N2 until use.
MCD spectra were recorded on a Jasco J-730W spectropolarimeter equipped
with an Oxford Instruments Spectromag 4000 superconducting magnet
and a liquid N2-cooled InSb detector. To affirm the authenticity
of the MCD signals, field dependencies at −7, +3.5, and +7
T were recorded at 5 K. The C-term origin of the signals was confirmed
by tracking temperature dependencies at 5, 20, and 40 K at +7 T (3
scans per condition were averaged).[12] The
data obtained were corrected by subtraction of the zero-field spectrum
at the respective temperature. MCD spectra were compared to their
respective CD counterparts in order to verify that transitions had
the same energies in CD and MCD and with and without glassing agent.
MD Simulations
A structural model of the HctB halogenase
domain was created by homology modeling as described previously.[11] MD simulations were performed with the YASARA
Structure suite, version 12.11.20 (YASARA Biosciences).[22] A periodic simulation cell, which comprised
the whole enzyme and an additional 5 Å in each dimension, was
used with explicit solvent. The AMBER99 force field[23] was employed and long-range electrostatic potentials were
calculated with the Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) method, with a cutoff
of 7.864 Å.[24,25] Force field parameters for α-KG
were generated with the AutoSMILES utility,[26] which assigned a van der Waals radius of 2.27 Å and a charge
of +2 to the iron cofactor. Fe(II) parameters were defined to reflect
the principal octahedral geometry of the Fe(II) center. An equilibrium
spring length that was derived from DFT calculations was used for
all ligands[27] with a stretching force constant
of 125 N m–1. Ligand–Fe–ligand angles
of minimum energy were defined as 180° for opposite ligands and
as 90° for all others, with angle bending force constants of
1000 kJ mol–1 rad.[2] In
this way, force field parameters for N-ε of His112, N-ε
of His228, and α-KG coordinating carboxylate and keto-oxygen
were defined for the chloride-free HctB model. For the chloride-containing
complex, analogous parameters were included for the iron coordinated
chloride ion. Note that no force field parameters were defined for
Glu224. In order to investigate the impact of a putative strongly
bound water at the halide position, in a second model the chloride
atom was substituted by a water molecule and the respective parameters
were adapted accordingly. In a third halide-free model a strongly
bound water was positioned in the sixth coordination site of the iron,
while the water in the halide binding position remained unrestricted.
The oxidation state of the iron cofactor in all complexes was either
+2, as assigned by AUTOSMILES, or–in order to assess the impact
of the effective iron charge on the simulation–adjusted to
values in the 0 to +2 range (see Table S2). The hydrogen bonding network was optimized by the method of Hooft
and co-workers,[28] and YASARA’s pKa values at pH 7.5 were assigned.[29] The simulation cell was filled with water at
a density of 0.997 g mL–1 using NaCl concentrations
of 0.001 and 1 M, respectively. After relaxation of the solvent the
system was energy minimized, whereby a steepest descent minimization
was applied to remove conformational stress, followed by a simulated
annealing minimization until convergence was reached (<0.05 kJ
mol–1 per 200 steps). Integration time steps were
set to 1.33 and 4 fs for intra- and intermolecular forces, respectively.
MD simulations at 298 K were initiated, whereby integration time steps
for intramolecular and intermolecular forces were set to 1.25 and
2.5 fs, respectively.
Results
Stopped-Flow Analysis
The oxidation of the Fe(II)-α-KG
complex was monitored spectrophotometrically via single turnover stopped-flow
measurements by recording the decay of its prototypical metal to ligand
charge transfer (MLCT) transition (ε500nm = 150 M–1 cm–1).[30] Therefore, anaerobic enzyme preparations of acylated HctB (Ac-HctB),
preloaded with ∼0.95 mol equiv Fe(II) and α-KG, were
mixed with O2-enriched (650–1400 μM) and,
optionally, 1 M NaCl-containing buffer at a 1:1 ratio. In the absence
of NaCl the α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB complex decayed
slowly with a specific rate of 1.1 × 10–3 s–1 (cO2 = 700 μM).
By contrast, under analogous conditions but in the presence of chloride,
the absorbance band disappeared within ∼20 s. The trace displayed
three distinct phases that could be resolved: A lag phase of ∼60
ms (kSC1 = 35.1 s–1)
was followed by a phase of fast signal decay, which gave an apparent
first-order rate constant kSC2 of 6.74
s–1 and accounted for approximately one-third of
the total amplitude. The third phase of the reaction, a slower absorbance
decrease (kSC3 = 0.22 s–1), equaled the O2 depletion rate (∼0.22 s–1) that had previously been determined using an O2 sensor
under similar conditions (Figure 1). (Note
that kSC1, kSC2, and kSC3 represent apparent first-order
net rate constants.)
Figure 1
Stopped-flow absorption kinetic traces of the α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB complex decay. The conversion
of the chromophoric α-KG-Fe(II)
pair was monitored in the absence (gray) and presence (black) of 0.5
M NaCl at 500 nm, and average traces were fit with a linear regression
(green) and via a three-phasic model using the Pro-Kineticist software
(Applied Photophysics, see Materials and Methods section for details),
respectively. The inset shows the initial 400 ms phase of the reaction.
Stopped-flow absorption kinetic traces of the α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB complex decay. The conversion
of the chromophoric α-KG-Fe(II)
pair was monitored in the absence (gray) and presence (black) of 0.5
M NaCl at 500 nm, and average traces were fit with a linear regression
(green) and via a three-phasic model using the Pro-Kineticist software
(Applied Photophysics, see Materials and Methods section for details),
respectively. The inset shows the initial 400 ms phase of the reaction.Rates were not significantly dependent
on the O2 concentration
(Table S1, Figure S1). The total amplitude
of signal decay corresponded to 97% of the α-KG-Fe(II) concentration,
confirming a quantitative conversion of the complex. It is worth noting
that in previous studies it was observed that the Fe(IV)=O
intermediate had a similar extinction coefficient at 520 nm as the
Fe(II)-α-KG complex but additionally showed a significant absorbance
increase at 318 nm (ε ≈ 1500 M–1 cm–1).[13] An analogous signal
increase was not detectable during substrate conversion by Ac-HctB.
Instead, a slow signal increase at 320 nm in the absence (Figure S2b) and presence (Figure S2d) of chloride was obtained, which may indicate some
Fe(II) oxidation as a side reaction.When nonacylated HctB (further
on termed HctB) was subjected to
stopped-flow analysis, the chloride-free complex displayed an almost
stable signal at 500 nm over the measured time range with a specific
rate of 0.1 × 10–3 s–1 (Figure S2a). In the presence of chloride, α-KG-Fe(II)-HctB precipitated under both aerobic and
anaerobic conditions. The velocity of precipitation was chloride dependent
and led to an absorbance increase over the whole recorded wavelength
range (Figures S2c, S3, and S4). This phenomenon,
which was not observed during O2 sensor measurements, prohibited
the determination of these reaction rates. Summarizing, according
to stopped-flow measurements the decay of the α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB complex is accelerated ≥200-fold by chloride, while the presence
of covalently bound substrate in the absence of chloride enhanced
the rate only by an order of magnitude.
CD, MCD, and VTVH MCD Spectroscopy
In order to gain
insight into the Fe(II) active site geometric and electronic structure,
combined CD/MCD spectroscopic measurements of the enzymatic Fe(II)
centers of HctB (i.e., no substrate) and Ac-HctB in the presence and
absence of α-KG and saturating NaCl concentrations were pursued.
The methodology developed in ref (31) allows for the determination of the Fe(II) center
geometric structure, based on the energies of its associated d–d
transitions: Free high spin Fe(II) possesses a 5D ground
state, which upon the influence of an octahedral ligand field splits
into a 5T2g ground state and a 5Eg excited state that are separated by 10 Dq ≈ 10 000
cm–1. The 5Eg state is further
split in the distorted octahedral geometry of a protein environment,
leading to two transitions split by ∼2000 cm–1. Removal of an axial ligand forms a square pyramidal five-coordinated
species resulting in the splitting of the 5Eg state by ∼5000 cm–1, yielding transitions
at ≥10 000 and ∼5000 cm–1.
Rearrangement to a trigonal bipyramidal 5C geometry leads to transitions
at <10 000 and <5000 cm–1 (the latter
frequently undetectable).[12] Thus, near-IR
(NIR) CD and MCD spectra give information on the number of different
Fe(II) coordination environments present in a sample as well as their
geometric structures. VTVH MCD complements these excited state data
by providing information on the ground state splitting of the t2g orbitals of a given site. A non-Kramers doublet model developed
previously for the fitting of VTVH MCD data provides ground state
spin Hamiltonian parameters δ and g|| for negative zero-field-split (ZFS) systems or axial D and rhombic |E| ZFS parameters for positive ZFS
systems, which in turn are used to determine the tetragonal splitting,
Δ, of the d orbital from the {d, d} pair,
as well as the rhombic splitting, V, of the d and d orbitals.[31] The relative energies of the five d orbitals
of an Fe(II) active site can therefore be determined, and the site’s
geometric and electronic structures characterized.283 K CD
and 5 K MCD spectra of Fe(II)-HctB and Fe(II)-Ac-HctB in the absence and presence of chloride are shown in Figure 2. In CD, these four enzyme forms all show two transitions
at ∼8100 and ∼10400 cm–1 (Figure 2a, c, e, and g) indicative of distorted octahedral
Fe(II) sites, whereas in MCD two transitions are observed at ∼9200
cm–1 and ∼11 400 cm–1 for the four forms (Figure 2b, d, f, and
h). Such shifts upon going to low temperature have been observed for
clavaminate synthase 2 (CS2)[30] and factor
inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor (FIH)[32] and are attributed to stronger ligand–metal bonds at lower
temperature. The similarity of the spectra for all four forms indicates
that no significant change in the eg orbitals of HctB-bound
Fe(II) has occurred in the presence of chloride or substrate.
Figure 2
283 K CD and
5 K MCD spectra of Fe(II)-HctB (a
and b, respectively, dark blue), Fe(II)-Ac-HctB (c
and d, respectively, light blue), Fe(II)/Cl (e and f, respectively, dark green), and Fe(II)/Cl (g and h, respectively, light green).
Component peaks and resultant fits are in black and colored dashed
lines, respectively.
283 K CD and
5 K MCD spectra of Fe(II)-HctB (a
and b, respectively, dark blue), Fe(II)-Ac-HctB (c
and d, respectively, light blue), Fe(II)/Cl (e and f, respectively, dark green), and Fe(II)/Cl (g and h, respectively, light green).
Component peaks and resultant fits are in black and colored dashed
lines, respectively.However, VTVH MCD data as shown in Figure 3 indicate that the t2g orbitals are perturbed when
chloride
is bound to Fe(II). The VTVH MCD data of Fe(II)-HctB and Fe(II)-Ac-HctB in the absence of chloride (Figure 3a and b) can be fit with the same parameters of
a positive ZFS system with D = +10.8 ± 0.1 cm–1 and |E| = 2.6 ± 0.1 cm–1, and corresponding t2g orbital splittings of Δ
≈ 500 ± 100 cm–1 and |V| ≈ 300 ± 50 cm–1. Upon addition of
chloride, the VTVH MCD data change outside of error as shown in supporting Figure S5a and b. Fe(II)/Cl (Figure 3c) fits to a positive
ZFS with parameters of D = +10.2 ± 0.1 cm–1 and |E| = 2.6 ± 0.1 cm–1, and corresponding t2g orbital splittings
of Δ ≈ 700 ± 100 cm–1 and |V| ≈ 450 ± 50 cm–1. The increased
t2g orbital splittings are attributed to chloride being
a stronger π donor ligand than the replaced water. In the presence
of substrate and chloride (Figure 3d), the
VTVH MCD data fit to give a positive ZFS with D = 3.7 ± 0.1 cm–1 and |E| = 2.4 ± 0.1 cm–1, and corresponding t2g orbital splittings
of Δ ∼ 850 ± 100 cm–1 and |V| ∼ 540 ± 50 cm-1. The substrate therefore
further perturbs the chloride bound Fe(II) site. That substrate binding
only appears to perturb the Fe(II) site when chloride is also present
is explored in the MD simulation section below.
Figure 3
VTVH MCD data and fitted
curves for Fe(II)-HctB (a, 2.2, 3.3, 5, 7.5, 10,
15, and 20 K, dark blue), Fe(II)-Ac-HctB (b, 2.2,
3.4, 5, 7.5, 10, and 15 K, light blue), Fe(II)/Cl (c, 2.3, 3.3, 5, and 7.5 K, dark green),
and Fe(II)/Cl (d, 2.2,
3.4, 5, 7.5, and 10 K, light green). Error bars for the data are shown
or otherwise are the size of the data points.
VTVH MCD data and fitted
curves for Fe(II)-HctB (a, 2.2, 3.3, 5, 7.5, 10,
15, and 20 K, dark blue), Fe(II)-Ac-HctB (b, 2.2,
3.4, 5, 7.5, 10, and 15 K, light blue), Fe(II)/Cl (c, 2.3, 3.3, 5, and 7.5 K, dark green),
and Fe(II)/Cl (d, 2.2,
3.4, 5, 7.5, and 10 K, light green). Error bars for the data are shown
or otherwise are the size of the data points.CD and MCD spectra of α-KG-Fe(II)-HctB and α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB in the absence and
presence of
chloride are given in Figure 4. In the presence
of α-KG both HctB and Ac-HctBMCD spectra show two NIR transitions at ∼8800 and 11 800
cm–1 as well as the rising edge of the Fe(II) →
α-KG π* metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) starting
at ∼16 000 cm–1 (Figure 4b and d).
Figure 4
283 K CD and 5 K MCD spectra of α-KG-Fe(II)-HctB (a and b, respectively, red), α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB (c and d, respectively, pink), α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl (e and f, respectively, orange), and α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl (g and h,
respectively, purple). Component peaks and resultant fits are in black
and colored dashed lines, respectively.
283 K CD and 5 K MCD spectra of α-KG-Fe(II)-HctB (a and b, respectively, red), α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB (c and d, respectively, pink), α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl (e and f, respectively, orange), and α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl (g and h,
respectively, purple). Component peaks and resultant fits are in black
and colored dashed lines, respectively.The presence of substrate does not lead to a significant
perturbation
of the MCD spectra in the absence of chloride for the α-KG-bound
Fe(II) site. The relatively large 5Eg splitting
of ∼3000 cm–1 is similar to that found in
α-KG/chloride-bound CytC3 (∼3660 cm–1)[33] and may be attributed to a weaker
water ligand than that found in a site containing the 2His/1-carboxylate
facial triad, such as CS2.[30] This has been
explained by the lack of the H-bond between the facial triad carboxylate
and the coordinated water, which gives this water partial hydroxide
character and strengthens the Fe–OH2 bond.[33]Upon addition of chloride, striking changes
occur. The MCD spectrum
of α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl-HctB (Figure 4f, orange) shows three NIR transitions at ∼7600, ∼9100,
and ∼12 100 cm–1, in addition to the
MLCT shoulder at ∼16 000 cm–1. The
presence of three transitions indicates that more than one Fe(II)
site is present. In order to determine the nature of these species
VTVH MCD data were collected on the three peaks at 7350, 9500, and
11 800 cm–1 as shown in Figure 5 (arrows in a, isotherms in b–d). VTVH MCD data collected
on the 7600 cm–1 transition are fit to a negative
ZFS with δ ≈ 1.3 ± 0.1 cm–1 and g|| ≈ 8.6 ± 0.1. The very small value
of δ is indicative of a trigonal bipyramidal site, as was found
to be present in the reduced, naphthalene-bound form of the Rieske-dependent
naphthalene dioxygenase, which possessed a feature at 8165 cm–1 with a δ ≈ 1.2 ± 0.1 cm–1 and g|| ≈ 8.5 ± 0.1.[34] Data collected at 9500 and 11 800 cm–1 were fit to the same ground state to give a positive
ZFS with D = 9.3 ± 0.1 cm–1 and |E| = 2.1 ± 0.1 cm–1, corresponding to t2g orbital splittings of Δ ≈
900 ± 100 cm–1 and |V| ≈
560 ± 50 cm–1. Note that the data at 11 800
cm–1 required the addition of a B term of approximately
12% of the total intensity, due to overlap with the MLCT transition. α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl-HctB is therefore a mixture of 6C and 5C
trigonal bipyramidal sites.
Figure 5
VTVH MCD analysis of α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl. (a) MCD spectrum with arrows marking
the energies
at which VTVH MCD data were collected, at (b) 7350 cm–1 (purple), (c) 9500 cm–1 (red), and (d) 11 800
cm–1 (orange). All data were collected at 2.2, 3.4,
5, 7.5, and 10 K. Error bars for the data are shown or otherwise are
the size of the data points.
VTVH MCD analysis of α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl. (a) MCD spectrum with arrows marking
the energies
at which VTVH MCD data were collected, at (b) 7350 cm–1 (purple), (c) 9500 cm–1 (red), and (d) 11 800
cm–1 (orange). All data were collected at 2.2, 3.4,
5, 7.5, and 10 K. Error bars for the data are shown or otherwise are
the size of the data points.The MCD spectrum of α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl-Ac-HctB (Figure 4h, purple) shows four transitions:
∼5000, ∼7600, ∼9900, and ∼12 000
cm–1. The presence of four ligand field transitions
indicates that α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl-Ac-HctB is
also a mixture in this case containing sites of square pyramidal (due
to the ∼5000 cm–1 transition) and octahedral
sites. VTVH MCD data were collected on the low-energy band at 5750
cm–1 as shown in Figure 6 (the other bands were too weak for a meaningful signal-to-noise
ratio). The VTVH MCD data for this band could be fit using negative
ZFS parameters of δ ≈ 2.6 ± 0.1 cm–1 and g|| ≈ 8.8 ± 0.1, corresponding
to t2g splittings of Δ ≈ −1100 ±
100 cm–1 and |V| ≈ 660 ±
50 cm–1, the larger t2g splitting being
consistent with a square pyramidal Fe(II) center. Thus, upon binding
of chloride to α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB the site
goes from 6C to 5C.
Figure 6
VTVH MCD analysis of α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl. (a) MCD spectrum with arrows marking
the energy
at which VTVH MCD data were collected at (b) 5750 cm–1 (purple). Data were collected at 2.3, 3.3, 5, and 7.5 K. Error bars
for the data are shown.
VTVH MCD analysis of α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl. (a) MCD spectrum with arrows marking
the energy
at which VTVH MCD data were collected at (b) 5750 cm–1 (purple). Data were collected at 2.3, 3.3, 5, and 7.5 K. Error bars
for the data are shown.To determine whether the maintenance of the six-coordinate
Fe(II)
site in the chloride-free α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB complex was due to a missing negative charge at the halide binding
position, we recorded the spectrum of the equivalent sample at a pD
of 9.1. However, the pD shift by 1.6 log units, which previously brought
about water deprotonation in a noncarboxylate coordinated Fe(II) center,[35] did not significantly alter the MCD spectrum
(Figure S6).No crystal structure for HctB is available
to date. Consequently, to elucidate the structural basis of chloride
mediated O2 activation, a model of the HctB halogenase
domain was constructed based on the crystal structure of SyrB21 and subjected to MD simulations in the absence and presence
of 1 M NaCl in the simulation cell. In order to ensure a geometrically
appropriate metal center structure, an octahedral iron force field
was defined and applied to the ligands, namely His112, His228, α-KG,
and—where appropriate—chloride, as detailed in the Experimental
Section. 100 ns MD simulations of the 2-His 1-Chloro α-KG ligated
Fe(II)-HctB model and its chloride-free analogue at 297 K showed overall
structures that were stable over the simulation time. However, in
the halide-free model, a rearrangement at the metal center was observed:
Residue Glu224, which pointed away from the metal center in all starting
structures, reoriented and coordinated to the Fe(II) ion, as demonstrated
in a 90 ns snapshot of the active site (Figure 7a). By contrast, the respective simulation in the presence of chloride
roughly preserved the conformation of Glu224 from the starting structure
(Figure 7b). When the simulation of the HctB
domain under chloride-free conditions was repeated with a water molecule
kept bound to the metal ion either at the axial, “6th”
position (Figure S7) or at the equatorial
position that is otherwise occupied by the chloride ion (Figure S8), Glu224 also reoriented in order to
point toward Fe(II) in both cases, whereby the residue’s carboxylate
moiety H-bonded to the water molecule that occupied the Cl– binding site or coordinated directly (Figures
S7 and S8). (Note that both a displacement and preservation
of metal bound water are feasible in principle and, therefore, needed
to be considered). Trajectories of the Fe(II)-Glu224carboxylateoxygen
distances show that this reorientation takes place instantaneously
(<100 ps), (Figures 8a, left, S9a, S10a). By contrast, in the chloride containing
structure the carboxylate moiety of Glu224 remained pointing away
from the HctB active site (Figure 8a, right),
presumably due to electrostatic interactions.
Figure 7
90 ns snapshots of the
HctB halogenase domains derived from MD
simulations of the modeled structures at 297 K. While in the chloride-free
structure (a) Glu224 points toward Fe(II) (orange ball), in the chloride-containing
structure (b) the halide (green ball) coordinates to Fe(II) and Glu224
points away from the metal cofactor. This results in a rearrangement
of the neighboring residues Val114, Tyr115, Asn140, and Arg225. Water
molecules are not displayed.
Figure 8
Trajectories from 100
ns MD simulations depicting distances of
residues involved in the chloride-triggered structural rearrangement
in HctB in the absence (left panels) and presence (right panels) of
1 M chloride. Panel a shows distances of O-5 and O-5′ of Glu224
to Fe(II). Panel b displays backbone distances from C-2 of Asn140
to N-2 of Glu224 (blue); N-2 of Val114 to C-2 of Glu224 (teal); and
C-2 of Tyr115 to C-2 of Arg225 (green). Panel c gives the distances
of the putative H-bonding atoms O-7 of Tyr115 to N-ω of Arg225
(red); O-7 of Tyr115 to N-ω′ of Arg225 (pink); N-2 of
Val114 to O-1 of Glu224 (dark red); and O-4 of Asn140 to N-2 of Glu224
(orange).
90 ns snapshots of the
HctB halogenase domains derived from MD
simulations of the modeled structures at 297 K. While in the chloride-free
structure (a) Glu224 points toward Fe(II) (orange ball), in the chloride-containing
structure (b) the halide (green ball) coordinates to Fe(II) and Glu224
points away from the metal cofactor. This results in a rearrangement
of the neighboring residues Val114, Tyr115, Asn140, and Arg225. Water
molecules are not displayed.In order to assess the impact of a probable overestimation
of electrostatics
in our model on the orientation of Glu224, 1 ns MD simulations at
varying reduced effective charges of Fe(II) were subsequently performed.
Results showed that the observed two principal distinct orientations
of Glu224, toward and away from Fe in the absence and presence of
chloride, were not sensitive to the Fe(II) charge within the studied
range of 0 to +2. However, for Cl–-free models with
no bound water in the halide binding pocket, increased charges roughly
correlated with increased frequency of direct coordination of Glu224
to Fe (Table S2).The reorientation
of Glu224 in the chloride-free HctB structures
led to major structural changes. The residue’s flipping resulted
in a H-bonding interaction between its backbone oxygen and the backbone
nitrogen of Val114 (Figure 8c, left, dark red)
in the model containing the water-free Fe(II) sphere and drew the
respective strands closer together (Figure 8b, left, teal). However, in the two models with a water tightly bound
to the Fe(II) center either at the chloride-binding position or at
the second water-binding position in the octahedral 2-His α-KG
complex, no interactions between these residues were observed (Figures S9b and S10b). In all three chloride-free
models (Figures 7a, S7,
and S8), the side chains of Tyr115 and Arg225 reduced their
distance from an average of 10 Å to 4–6 Å (Figures 8c, S9c, and S10c, pink
and red traces) and became less flexible. In the case of the halide-free
model without tightly bound water, the backbone nitrogen of Glu224
formed a H-bond with the side chain oxo group of Asn140 (Figure 8c, left, orange). In all halide-free models, the
backbone of Asn140 and Glu224 came closer together (Figures 8b, S9b, and S10b, blue
traces). Thus, according to our models, the effect of chloride binding
to Fe(II) is to induce conformational changes in HctB.Trajectories from 100
ns MD simulations depicting distances of
residues involved in the chloride-triggered structural rearrangement
in HctB in the absence (left panels) and presence (right panels) of
1 M chloride. Panel a shows distances of O-5 and O-5′ of Glu224
to Fe(II). Panel b displays backbone distances from C-2 of Asn140
to N-2 of Glu224 (blue); N-2 of Val114 to C-2 of Glu224 (teal); and
C-2 of Tyr115 to C-2 of Arg225 (green). Panel c gives the distances
of the putative H-bonding atoms O-7 of Tyr115 to N-ω of Arg225
(red); O-7 of Tyr115 to N-ω′ of Arg225 (pink); N-2 of
Val114 to O-1 of Glu224 (dark red); and O-4 of Asn140 to N-2 of Glu224
(orange).
Discussion
The Impact
of Chloride Binding on the Metal Center Geometry
and the O2 Reduction Activity
This study demonstrates
that although an enzymatic α-KG bound Fe(II) center is constituted
in the absence of a halide, the latter impacts the geometric structure
of the metal center and thereby triggers O2 activation
in HctB. CD/MCD spectroscopic studies of the metal centers in Fe(II)-HctB and Fe(II)-Ac-HctB show a stable
six-coordinate geometry in the absence of any cofactor. This sets
HctB apart from the related α-KG dependent halogenase CytC3,
where α-KG was a prerequisite for Fe(II) binding to the enzyme
in solution.[33] HctB samples with and without
chloride show similar excited-state spectral features. However, the
dπ (t2g) orbitals are perturbed upon halide binding
as shown by VTVH MCD. Also, while the ground state splitting is the
same for Fe(II)-HctB and Fe(II)-Ac-HctB in the absence of halide, the splittings for halide-bound HctB in
the absence of substrate differ from those where the substrate is
bound. These results provide experimental evidence for the effect
of halide binding on protein conformation and thus are consistent
with MD simultations. It is interesting to note that in the presence
of α-KG and substrate, conditions in which most other α-KG-dependent
enzymes trigger water ligand dissociation and activation of O2, the Fe(II) site in HctB remains 6C (Figure 4c and d).This is consistent with the idea that the
substrate does not sterically interact with the active site until
chloride is bound to Fe(II). Evidence for a 5C Fe(II) site is found
only upon binding of chloride to the α-KG-Fe(II) site. For α-KG-Fe(II)/Cl a 5C/6C
mixture of square pyramidal and octahedral sites is present. The vacated
coordination site allows binding of O2 and results in an
active site that is competent for catalysis. This is supported by
stopped-flow kinetics, which demonstrate that the presence of chloride
results in a ≥200-fold increase in the rate of α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB complex decay. Interestingly, the presence of α-KG and chloride
but absence of substrate leads to the formation of a mixture of trigonal
bipyramidal and octahedral sites. This directly reflects the slow
but measurable uncoupled consumption of O2, observed only
for this form (7% of the rate of α-KG-Fe(II)-Cl-Ac-HctB(11)). These findings are in contrast to
the results for CytC3, which showed the presence of only 6C sites
unless α-KG, substrate, and chloride were all present,[33] and kinetic findings for SyrB2 which showed
a 5000-fold loss in rate in the absence of substrate.[36]
A Putative Role of Glu224 in O2 Activation of HctB
In the absence of a crystal structure
for HctB, stuctural models
of its halogenase domain allowed some interesting insights into a
putative role of Cl– in the activation of HctB for
catalysis: MD simulations of the HctB structural models suggest major
structural differences between the chloride-bound and chloride-free
forms. In the absence of chloride, the carboxylate moiety of Glu224
is oriented toward the iron center (either directly binding to Fe(II)
or H-bonding to a coordinated H2O). This results in H-bonding
interactions between the backbones of Glu224 and Val114 in models
containing a water-free Fe(II) center. Additionally, hydrogen bonds
form between Glu224 and Asn140 in all investigated halide-free models
that bring the residues’ carbon atoms closer together. Moreover
the distances between the Tyr115 and Arg225 side chains are significantly
reduced in all chloride-free models. Notably, previous in
silico docking studies suggested that the fatty acyl moiety
accesses the active site between the strands that contain residues
114–115 and 224–225 (Figure S11).[11] As these residues converge in the
chloride-free model, an analogous active site access by the substrate’s
acyl moiety could be severely hampered. Such a scenario provides a
rationale for the substrate’s inability to affect MCD spectra
(i.e., the 6C → 5C conversion) and to markedly increase O2 consumption rates in the absence of chloride. The apparent
transient stability of the α-KG-Fe(II)-Ac-HctB complex during single turnover kinetics, which is mirrored by the
∼60 ms lag phase in Figure 1, may thus
reflect the reorganization of the enzyme upon chloride binding, involving
the opening of the substrate channel, the substrate entrance to the
active site, and the formation of the five-coordinate iron center
required for the O2 dependent catalysis to take place.
In the absence of chloride a bound water could take the halide’s
position at the metal center, or alternatively, direct coordination
of Glu224 could take place. A corresponding acidic amino acid residue
is present in the other so far annotated fatty acyl-halogenase Psm3L,
but it is not generally conserved in MNH halogenases. According to
sequence alignments, the amino acyl-halogenases have a serine in the
respective position and in the structure of SyrB2 this residue occupies
a similar space as Glu224 in the HctB model. Therefore, the proposed
molecular mechanism may be specific to this subtype of fatty acyl-halogenases.
However, a principal role of chloride in the activation of halogenases
by triggering changes in the protein structure may be a general feature
of the MNH halogenase mechanism. Interestingly, in SyrB2 a major rearrangement
of polypeptide strands was obtained upon binding of Fe(II) and chloride
to an α-KG containing structure.[1] In CurA, concomitant coordination of α-KG and chloride to
the iron center also resulted in a structural reorganization.[3] In contrast, CytC3, which could not be crystallized
with a metal coordinated halide, possesses the same conformation in
its apo and Fe(II)+α-KG-bound forms.[2] Even though structural data are scarce and the presence of charged
buffer molecules may compromise their interpretation, it is noteworthy
that in the available studies conformational rearrangements were accompanied
by a switch from a halide-free to a halide-coordinating metal center.
Particularly for halogenases with low chloride affinity and those
that perform multiple halogenations per substrate and therefore consume
the bound halide, a chloride-dependent activation would prevent undesired
hydroxylation after the primary halogenation step. Note that a report
was recently published that briefly described the chloride induced
formation of an Fe(IV) species in SyrB2, supporting our notion that
this may be a general mechanism in halogenases.[37]In summary, the present study has shown that halide
binding is key for the O2 reactivity of HctB, as neither
is an open coordination position for O2 binding present
nor is the substrate allowed to properly align above the active site
unless halide is ligated to Fe(II). These effects help to maintain
halogenase activity in HctB and may be factors involved in the mechanisms
of halogenases in general.
Authors: E I Solomon; T C Brunold; M I Davis; J N Kemsley; S K Lee; N Lehnert; F Neese; A J Skulan; Y S Yang; J Zhou Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2000-01-12 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Masashi Ueki; Danica P Galonić; Frédéric H Vaillancourt; Sylvie Garneau-Tsodikova; Ellen Yeh; David A Vosburg; Frank C Schroeder; Hiroyuki Osada; Christopher T Walsh Journal: Chem Biol Date: 2006-11
Authors: Megan L Matthews; Christopher S Neumann; Linde A Miles; Tyler L Grove; Squire J Booker; Carsten Krebs; Christopher T Walsh; J Martin Bollinger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Megan L Matthews; Courtney M Krest; Eric W Barr; Frédéric H Vaillancourt; Christopher T Walsh; Michael T Green; Carsten Krebs; J Martin Bollinger Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Wei Jiang; John R Heemstra; Ry R Forseth; Christopher S Neumann; Soraya Manaviazar; Frank C Schroeder; Karl J Hale; Christopher T Walsh Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 3.162