Literature DB >> 24846726

Hope for health and health care.

William E Stempsey1.   

Abstract

Virtually all activities of health care are motivated at some level by hope. Patients hope for a cure; for relief from pain; for a return home. Physicians hope to prevent illness in their patients; to make the correct diagnosis when illness presents itself; that their prescribed treatments will be effective. Researchers hope to learn more about the causes of illness; to discover new and more effective treatments; to understand how treatments work. Ultimately, all who work in health care hope to offer their patients hope. In this paper, I offer a brief analysis of hope, considering the definitions of Hobbes, Locke, Hume and Thomas Aquinas. I then differentiate shallow and deep hope and show how hope in health care can remain shallow. Next, I explore what a philosophy of deep hope in health care might look like, drawing important points from Ernst Bloch and Gabriel Marcel. Finally, I suggest some implications of this philosophy of hope for patients, physicians, and researchers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24846726     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9572-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  10 in total

1.  Miracles and the limits of medical knowledge.

Authors:  William E Stempsey
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2002

2.  Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism.

Authors:  Sam Horng; Christine Grady
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

3.  The problem with optimism in clinical trials.

Authors:  Lynn A Jansen
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

4.  The breadth of hopes.

Authors:  Chris Feudtner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C W Lidz; P Benson; W Winslade
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Variants of uncertainty.

Authors:  D Kahneman; A Tversky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1982-03

7.  Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials.

Authors:  C Daugherty; M J Ratain; E Grochowski; C Stocking; E Kodish; R Mick; M Siegler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Participation in clinical trials as viewed by the patient: understanding cultural and emotional aspects which influence choice.

Authors:  Chiara Catania; Tommaso De Pas; Aron Goldhirsch; Davide Radice; Laura Adamoli; Marta Medici; Elena Verri; Cristina Marenghi; Filippo de Braud; Franco Nolè
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.935

9.  Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  K P Weinfurt; D P Sulmasy; K A Schulman; N J Meropol
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2003

10.  Patient motivations surrounding participation in phase I and phase II clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Z A Nurgat; W Craig; N C Campbell; J D Bissett; J Cassidy; M C Nicolson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Value in Verifying Medical Folklore.

Authors:  Dennis J Baumgardner
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2017-08-10

2.  An Integrative Framework of Appraisal and Adaptation in Serious Medical Illness.

Authors:  Kathleen E Bickel; Cari Levy; Edward R MacPhee; Keri Brenner; Jennifer S Temel; Joanna J Arch; Joseph A Greer
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Solicitude: balancing compassion and empowerment in a relational ethics of hope-an empirical-ethical study in palliative care.

Authors:  Erik Olsman; Dick Willems; Carlo Leget
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2016-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.