Literature DB >> 32446974

An Integrative Framework of Appraisal and Adaptation in Serious Medical Illness.

Kathleen E Bickel1, Cari Levy2, Edward R MacPhee3, Keri Brenner4, Jennifer S Temel5, Joanna J Arch6, Joseph A Greer7.   

Abstract

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that palliative care improves the quality of life of individuals with serious medical illness. Research also suggests that in patients with advanced cancer, palliative care's focus on symptom management, coping with illness, goals of care, and treatment decisions may be associated with improved patient quality of life in part by increasing patients' use of active (vs. passive) and approach-oriented (vs. avoidant) coping strategies. However, without a framework outlining the process that individuals with serious medical illness and their loved ones undergo, it is challenging to discern exactly where, how, and why palliative care may affect the serious medical illness experience. To address this gap, we propose a clinically applicable framework, derived from existing theory and research in the social and behavioral sciences. This framework, called the Integrative Framework of Appraisal and Adaptation in Serious Medical Illness, describes how patients and their loved ones cognitively and emotionally process the various events that may occur as they navigate serious medical illness and the end of life. The framework also describes how individuals and their loved ones use that event processing to determine next steps, while considering the impact of their surrounding external environment, their individual social roles, and their connections on this decision making. The framework presented in this article is intended to improve our ability to understand and care for individuals with serious medical illness and their loved ones, while stimulating further discussion and research to test and refine these ideas. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Palliative care; cognitive science; hospice; psychological adaptation; psychological theory; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32446974      PMCID: PMC7483912          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  165 in total

1.  The blues broaden, but the nasty narrows: attentional consequences of negative affects low and high in motivational intensity.

Authors:  Philip Gable; Eddie Harmon-Jones
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-14

Review 2.  Psychoanalytic reflections on mortality: a reconsideration.

Authors:  Gary Rodin; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry       Date:  2008

Review 3.  Assessment of methods for measuring social support.

Authors:  C A Heitzmann; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 4.  Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: when theory, research and practice inform each other.

Authors:  S Folkman; S Greer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  'I am part of the community but...' The changing context of rural living for persons with advanced cancer and their families.

Authors:  W D Duggleby; K Penz; B D Leipert; D M Wilson; D Goodridge; A Williams
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 6.  Patient Empowerment and its neighbours: clarifying the boundaries and their mutual relationships.

Authors:  Lia Paola Fumagalli; Giovanni Radaelli; Emanuele Lettieri; Paolo Bertele'; Cristina Masella
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Coping and Prognostic Awareness in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Joseph A Greer; Areej El-Jawahri; Samantha M Moran; Lara Traeger; Jamie M Jacobs; Juliet C Jacobsen; Emily R Gallagher; Elyse R Park; David P Ryan; Vicki A Jackson; William F Pirl; Jennifer S Temel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Ego-resiliency reloaded: a three-component model of general resiliency.

Authors:  Dávid Farkas; Gábor Orosz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Is patient empowerment the key to promote adherence? A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy, health locus of control and medication adherence.

Authors:  Lilla Náfrádi; Kent Nakamoto; Peter J Schulz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Coping Circumplex Model: An Integrative Model of the Structure of Coping With Stress.

Authors:  Krzysztof Stanisławski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.