Literature DB >> 24845044

Biobanking, consent, and control: a survey of Albertans on key research ethics issues.

Timothy Caulfield1, Christen Rachul, Erin Nelson.   

Abstract

While the development of large scale biobanks continues, ethics and policy challenges persist. Debate surrounds key issues such as giving and withdrawing consent, incidental findings and return of results, and ownership and control of tissue samples. Studies of public perception have demonstrated a lack of consensus on these issues, particularly in different jurisdictions. We conducted a telephone survey of members of the public in Alberta, Canada. The survey addressed the aforementioned issues, but also explored public trust in the individuals and institutions involved in biobanking research. Results show that the Alberta public is fairly consistent in their responses and that those who preferred a broad consent model were also less likely to desire continuing control and a right to withdraw samples. The study raises questions about the role of public perceptions and opinions, particularly in the absence of consensus.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24845044     DOI: 10.1089/bio.2012.0029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  22 in total

1.  Returning Results: Let's Be Honest!

Authors:  Bernice S Elger; Eva De Clercq
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-02-24

2.  Scientists' perspectives on consent in the context of biobanking research.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Lisa Campo-Engelstein; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Industry involvement in publicly funded biobanks.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Pascal Borry; Herbert Gottweis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Stakeholders' perspectives on biobank-based genomic research: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alma Husedzinovic; Dominik Ose; Christoph Schickhardt; Stefan Fröhling; Eva C Winkler
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Patient consent preferences on sharing personal health information during the COVID-19 pandemic: "the more informed we are, the more likely we are to help".

Authors:  Sarah Tosoni; Indu Voruganti; Katherine Lajkosz; Shahbano Mustafa; Anne Phillips; S Joseph Kim; Rebecca K S Wong; Donald Willison; Carl Virtanen; Ann Heesters; Fei-Fei Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.834

6.  Incorporating exclusion clauses into informed consent for biobanking.

Authors:  Zubin Master; David B Resnik
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Constructing populations in biobanking.

Authors:  Aaro Tupasela; Karoliina Snell; Jose A Cañada
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2015-07-21

8.  Cancer patient perceptions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobanking.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Jaime O Claudio; Christen Rachul; Jean C Y Wang; Mark D Minden; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking.

Authors:  Yann Joly; Gratien Dalpé; Derek So; Stanislav Birko
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; R Jean Cadigan; Teresa P Edwards; Ian Conlon; Anders G Nelson; James P Evans; Arlene M Davis; Catherine Zimmer; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.