Literature DB >> 24844904

2012 best practices for repositories collection, storage, retrieval, and distribution of biological materials for research international society for biological and environmental repositories.

.   

Abstract

Third Edition [Formula: see text] [Box: see text] Printed with permission from the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER)
© 2011 ISBER All Rights Reserved Editor-in-Chief Lori D. Campbell, PhD Associate Editors Fay Betsou, PhD Debra Leiolani Garcia, MPA Judith G. Giri, PhD Karen E. Pitt, PhD Rebecca S. Pugh, MS Katherine C. Sexton, MBA Amy P.N. Skubitz, PhD Stella B. Somiari, PhD Individual Contributors to the Third Edition Jonas Astrin, Susan Baker, Thomas J. Barr, Erica Benson, Mark Cada, Lori Campbell, Antonio Hugo Jose Froes Marques Campos, David Carpentieri, Omoshile Clement, Domenico Coppola, Yvonne De Souza, Paul Fearn, Kelly Feil, Debra Garcia, Judith Giri, William E. Grizzle, Kathleen Groover, Keith Harding, Edward Kaercher, Joseph Kessler, Sarah Loud, Hannah Maynor, Kevin McCluskey, Kevin Meagher, Cheryl Michels, Lisa Miranda, Judy Muller-Cohn, Rolf Muller, James O'Sullivan, Karen Pitt, Rebecca Pugh, Rivka Ravid, Katherine Sexton, Ricardo Luis A. Silva, Frank Simione, Amy Skubitz, Stella Somiari, Frans van der Horst, Gavin Welch, Andy Zaayenga 2012 Best Practices for Repositories: Collection, Storage, Retrieval and Distribution of Biological Materials for Research INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL REPOSITORIES (ISBER) INTRODUCTION T he availability of high quality biological and environmental specimens for research purposes requires the development of standardized methods for collection, long-term storage, retrieval and distribution of specimens that will enable their future use. Sharing successful strategies for accomplishing this goal is one of the driving forces for the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER). For more information about ISBER see www.isber.org . ISBER's Best Practices for Repositories (Best Practices) reflect the collective experience of its members and has received broad input from other repository professionals. Throughout this document effective practices are presented for the management of specimen collections and repositories. The term "Best Practice" is used in cases where a level of operation is indicated that is above the basic recommended practice or more specifically designates the most effective practice. It is understood that repositories in certain locations or with particular financial constraints may not be able to adhere to each of the items designated as "Best Practices". Repositories fitting into either of these categories will need to decide how they might best adhere to these recommendations within their particular circumstances. While adherence to ISBER Best Practices is strictly on a voluntary basis, it is important to note that some aspects of specimen management are governed by national/federal, regional and local regulations. The reader should refer directly to regulations for their national/federal, regional and local requirements, as appropriate. ISBER has strived to include terminology appropriate to the various specimen types covered under these practices, but here too, the reader should take steps to ensure the appropriateness of the recommendations to their particular repository type prior to the implementation of any new approaches. Important terms within the document are italicized when first used in a section and defined in the glossary. The ISBER Best Practices are periodically reviewed and revised to reflect advances in research and technology. The third edition of the Best Practices builds on the foundation established in the first and second editions which were published in 2005 and 2008, respectively.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID： 24844904     DOI： 10.1089/bio.2012.1022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN： 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  70 in total

1.  The Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT): Online Financial Planning to Facilitate Biobank Sustainability.

Authors:  Hana Odeh; Lisa Miranda; Abhi Rao; Jim Vaught; Howard Greenman; Jeffrey McLean; Daniel Reed; Sarfraz Memon; Benjamin Fombonne; Ping Guan; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  The changing landscape of phase I trials in oncology.

Authors:  Kit Man Wong; Anna Capasso; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  A decision tool to guide the ethics review of a challenging breed of emerging genomic projects.

Authors:  Yann Joly; Derek So; Gladys Osien; Laura Crimi; Martin Bobrow; Don Chalmers; Susan E Wallace; Nikolajs Zeps; Bartha Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Activity-Dependent Reconnection of Adult-Born Dentate Granule Cells in a Mouse Model of Frontotemporal Dementia.

Authors:  Julia Terreros-Roncal; Miguel Flor-García; Elena P Moreno-Jiménez; Noemí Pallas-Bazarra; Alberto Rábano; Nirnath Sah; Henriette van Praag; Damiana Giacomini; Alejandro F Schinder; Jesús Ávila; Maria Llorens-Martín
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Designing and managing a flexible and dynamic biorepository system: a 15-year perspective from the CPCRA, ESPRIT, and INSIGHT clinical trial networks.

Authors:  Katherine H Hullsiek; Michelle George; Shawn K Brown
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 6.  Procurement and Storage of Surgical Biospecimens.

Authors:  Amin Hojat; Bowen Wei; Madeline G Olson; Qinwen Mao; William H Yong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

7.  The Utilization of Biospecimens: Impact of the Choice of Biobanking Model.

Authors:  William E Grizzle; Marianna J Bledsoe; Sameer Al Diffalha; Dennis Otali; Katherine C Sexton
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  "Forward-Thinking" in U.S. Biobanking.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Teresa P Edwards; Dragana Lassiter; Arlene M Davis; Gail E Henderson
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-01-24

Review 9.  Biobanks and personalized medicine.

Authors:  J E Olson; S J Bielinski; E Ryu; E M Winkler; P Y Takahashi; J Pathak; J R Cerhan
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.438

10.  An informatics supported web-based data annotation and query tool to expedite translational research for head and neck malignancies.

Authors:  Waqas Amin; Hyunseok P Kang; Ann Marie Egloff; Harpreet Singh; Kerry Trent; Jennifer Ridge-Hetrick; Raja R Seethala; Jennifer Grandis; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 4.430
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.