Literature DB >> 24841079

Automatic motor activation by mere instruction.

Tom Everaert1, Marijke Theeuwes, Baptist Liefooghe, Jan De Houwer.   

Abstract

Previous behavioral studies have shown that instructions about stimulus-response (S-R) mappings can influence task performance even when these instructions are irrelevant for the current task. In the present study, we tested whether automatic effects of S-R instructions occur because the instructed stimuli automatically activate their corresponding responses. We registered the lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) that were evoked by the instructed stimuli while participants were performing a task for which those mappings were irrelevant. Instructed S-R mappings clearly affected task performance in electrophysiological and behavioral measures. The LRP was found to deflect in the direction of the response tendency that corresponded with the instructed S-R mapping. Early activation of the instructed response was observed but occurred predominantly on slow trials. In contrast, response conflict evoked by instructed S-R mappings did not modulate the N2 amplitude. The results strongly suggest that, like experienced S-R mappings, instructed S-R mappings can lead to automatic response activation, but possibly via a different route.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24841079     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0294-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  54 in total

1.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs.

Authors:  R Ulrich; J Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Working memory load but not multitasking eliminates the prepared reflex: further evidence from the adapted flanker paradigm.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Oshrit Cohen-Kdoshay
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-01-12

3.  Word and deed: a computational model of instruction following.

Authors:  Anand Ramamoorthy; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Instruction-induced feature binding.

Authors:  Dorit Wenke; Robert Gaschler; Dieter Nattkemper
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-10

5.  Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Wim Gevers; Elie Ratinckx; Wouter De Baene; Wim Fias
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

Review 6.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences.

Authors:  J Miller; T Patterson; R Ulrich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Assembling old tricks for new tasks: a neural model of instructional learning and control.

Authors:  Tsung-Ren Huang; Thomas E Hazy; Seth A Herd; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  Attention to future actions: the influence of instructed S-R versus S-S mappings on attentional control.

Authors:  Helen Tibboel; Baptist Liefooghe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-06

2.  The instruction-based congruency effect predicts task execution efficiency: Evidence from inter- and intra-individual differences.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Berre Deltomme; Baptist Liefooghe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

3.  Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus-response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Maayan Pereg; Yoav Kessler; Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  LRP predicts smooth pursuit eye movement onset during the ocular tracking of self-generated movements.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Influence of verbal instructions on effect-based action control.

Authors:  Andreas B Eder; David Dignath
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-04

Review 7.  What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Elger L Abrahamse; Wout Duthoo; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08

8.  Structure and Implementation of Novel Task Rules: A Cross-Sectional Developmental Study.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Rossy McLaren; Maayan Pereg; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-05-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.