Faraj El-Gehani1, Scott North2, Sunita Ghosh2, Peter Venner2. 1. Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB; 2. Department of Oncology, University of Alberta; and Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder improves survival. This study was undertaken to determine the rate of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin use prior to RC and to assess its effect on the pathologic response rates and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This retrospective chart review examined all patients having a RC between January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2011. We collected patient demographics, pre-treatment clinical stage, type of chemotherapy, post-RC pathologic data and survival data. RESULTS: A total of 251 RC were performed of which 160 were for stage cT2-T4 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Of the 160 patients, 91 (57%) received neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) and 69 (43%) went straight to RC. Patients receiving neoadjuvant GC had a greater chance of achieving a pathologically lower stage compared to the untreated population: pT0 at 21% vs. 3%; non-invasive cancer at 37% vs. 10%; and organ-confined cancer at 60% vs. 33% (p < 0.001). Survival correlated with pathological stage: ≤pT3a patients had a median OS and CSS of 48.8 and 51.2 months compared to an OS and a CSS in ≥pT3b patients of 21.8 and 28.1 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is more frequently administered at our institution compared to the published literature. We have found that neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases the rate of down-staging, which is associated with a reduced the risk of death from urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder improves survival. This study was undertaken to determine the rate of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin use prior to RC and to assess its effect on the pathologic response rates and cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This retrospective chart review examined all patients having a RC between January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2011. We collected patient demographics, pre-treatment clinical stage, type of chemotherapy, post-RC pathologic data and survival data. RESULTS: A total of 251 RC were performed of which 160 were for stage cT2-T4 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Of the 160 patients, 91 (57%) received neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) and 69 (43%) went straight to RC. Patients receiving neoadjuvant GC had a greater chance of achieving a pathologically lower stage compared to the untreated population: pT0 at 21% vs. 3%; non-invasive cancer at 37% vs. 10%; and organ-confined cancer at 60% vs. 33% (p < 0.001). Survival correlated with pathological stage: ≤pT3a patients had a median OS and CSS of 48.8 and 51.2 months compared to an OS and a CSS in ≥pT3b patients of 21.8 and 28.1 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder is more frequently administered at our institution compared to the published literature. We have found that neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases the rate of down-staging, which is associated with a reduced the risk of death from urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
Authors: Laura S Mertens; Richard P Meijer; Wim Meinhardt; Henk G van der Poel; Axel Bex; J Martijn Kerst; Michiel S van der Heijden; Andries M Bergman; Simon Horenblas; Bas W G van Rhijn Journal: BJU Int Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Daniel Canter; Rosalia Viterbo; Alexander Kutikov; Yu-Ning Wong; Elizabeth Plimack; Fang Zhu; Megan Oblaczynski; Raffi Berberian; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Stephen A Boorjian Journal: Urology Date: 2010-08-14 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Adrian S Fairey; Niels-Erik B Jacobsen; Michael P Chetner; David R Mador; James B Metcalfe; Ronald B Moore; Keith F Rourke; Gerald T Todd; Peter M Venner; Don C Voaklander; Eric P Estey Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-05-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Laura S Mertens; Richard P Meijer; J Martijn Kerst; Andries M Bergman; Harm van Tinteren; Bas W G van Rhijn; Simon Horenblas Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Atreya Dash; Joseph A Pettus; Harry W Herr; Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; S Machele Donat; Paul Russo; Mary G Boyle; Matthew I Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; V O Speights; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ralph W deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; David P Wood; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tina Hsu; Peter C Black; Kim N Chi; Christina M Canil; Bernhard J Eigl; Girish Kulkarni; Scott North; Lori Wood; Alexandre R Zlotta; Anthea Lau; Tony Panzarella; Srikala S Sridhar Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Fred Saad; Rodney H Breau; Girish Kulkarni; David M Guttman; Ken Bagshaw; Jonathan Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S Sridhar; Fadi Brimo; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Niels Jacobsen; Chris Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; Alex Zlotta; Neil Fleshner; D Robert Siemens; Peter C Black Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Meera R Chappidi; Max Kates; Aaron Brant; Alexander S Baras; George J Netto; Phillip M Pierorazio; Noah M Hahn; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: Urology Date: 2017-01-16 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Ronald Kool; Ivan Yanev; Tarek Hijal; Marie Vanhuyse; Fabio L Cury; Luis Souhami; Wassim Kassouf; Alice Dragomir Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 2.052