Literature DB >> 21665907

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Gou Kaneko1, Eiji Kikuchi, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Jun Obata, So Nakamura, Akira Miyajima, Mototsugu Oya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Downstaging by neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In salvage setting, gemcitabine plus cisplatin has demonstrated an efficacy similar to that of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin with less toxicity. Therefore, the application of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin is also being anticipated.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients who received neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin were evaluated. The rate of downstaging, chemotherapy delivery profile and toxicity data were assessed. As comparator group, nine patients who were administered with neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin were evaluated.
RESULTS: A mean of 1.9 cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin were performed. Achieved drug intensity for gemcitabine and cisplatin was 83.8 and 95.4%. Downstaging to pT0 and <pT2 was achieved in 50.0 and 63.6%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia appeared in 14.3, 2.4, 21.4 and 2.4%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was not observed. Thrombocytosis developed in 26.2%. A mean of 2.3 cycles of neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin were performed. The achieved drug intensities for methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin were 59.6, 69.8, 100 and 88.6%. In patients treated with neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin, downstaging to pT0 and <pT2 was achieved in 22.2 and 44.4%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia was present in 19.1, 9.5 and 4.8%. Grade 3 nausea developed in 28.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of downstaging by neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin was comparable with that by methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin was associated with less non-hematologic toxicity than methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21665907     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyr068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  13 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Two-Step Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ming Yin; Monika Joshi; Richard P Meijer; Michael Glantz; Sheldon Holder; Harold A Harvey; Matthew Kaag; Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Simon Horenblas; Joseph J Drabick
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-04-06

2.  Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Homayoun Zargar; Patrick N Espiritu; Adrian S Fairey; Laura S Mertens; Colin P Dinney; Maria C Mir; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Michael S Cookson; Niels-Erik Jacobsen; Nilay M Gandhi; Joshua Griffin; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Nikhil Vasdev; Evan Y Yu; David Youssef; Evanguelos Xylinas; Nicholas J Campain; Wassim Kassouf; Marc A Dall'Era; Jo-An Seah; Cesar E Ercole; Simon Horenblas; Srikala S Sridhar; John S McGrath; Jonathan Aning; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jonathan L Wright; Andrew C Thorpe; Todd M Morgan; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Scott North; Daniel A Barocas; Yair Lotan; Jorge A Garcia; Andrew J Stephenson; Jay B Shah; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Philippe E Spiess; Peter C Black
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Multimodal management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jong Chul Park; Deborah E Citrin; Piyush K Agarwal; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based regimens for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sumanta K Pal; Nora H Ruel; Timothy G Wilson; Bertram E Yuh
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 5.  Pooled analysis of clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant cisplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Bertram E Yuh; Nora Ruel; Timothy G Wilson; Nicholas Vogelzang; Sumanta K Pal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Improving the outcome of patients with muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder with neoadjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy: A single institution experience.

Authors:  Faraj El-Gehani; Scott North; Sunita Ghosh; Peter Venner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Current and recent clinical trials for perioperative systemic therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vishal Vashistha; David I Quinn; Tanya B Dorff; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Role of gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer: Experience over the last decade.

Authors:  Sunny Goel; Rahul J Sinha; Ved Bhaskar; Ruchir Aeron; Ashish Sharma; Vishwajeet Singh
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-06-25

9.  Update on the management of invasive bladder cancer 2012.

Authors:  Hans Goethuys; Hein Van Poppel
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Comparison between neoadjuvant and adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Nobuaki Matsubara; Hirofumi Mukai; Yoichi Naito; Masahiko Nezu; Kuniaki Itoh
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.601

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.