Literature DB >> 22901581

Carboplatin based induction chemotherapy for nonorgan confined bladder cancer--a reasonable alternative for cisplatin unfit patients?

Laura S Mertens1, Richard P Meijer, J Martijn Kerst, Andries M Bergman, Harm van Tinteren, Bas W G van Rhijn, Simon Horenblas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated induction carboplatin based chemotherapy in patients with nonorgan confined urothelial carcinoma who were considered unfit for cisplatin. A comparison was made with patients who received induction cisplatin based combination chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 167 patients with nonorgan confined urothelial carcinoma who received induction cisplatin based combination chemotherapy (126) or gemcitabine and carboplatin (41) at our hospital between 1990 and 2010. Of the patients 124 completed 4 cycles of cisplatin based combination chemotherapy or gemcitabine and carboplatin. Clinical response (ycTNM) was evaluated according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1. Radical cystectomy and bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection were performed in 106 patients. A pathological complete response was defined as no evidence of disease (ypT0N0). Disease specific survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Complete clinical response rates did not differ significantly among the treatment groups. A pathological complete response was seen in 33.7% of specimens in the cisplatin based combination chemotherapy group vs 30.3% in the gemcitabine and carboplatin group (p = 0.808). We found no significant difference in disease specific survival between patients who started cisplatin based combination chemotherapy and those who started gemcitabine and carboplatin. For patients who completed 4 cycles and underwent radical cystectomy there was also no significant difference in disease specific survival between the groups. On multivariate analysis a pathological complete response was the only variable significantly associated with disease specific survival (p <0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: Induction gemcitabine and carboplatin for nonorgan confined urothelial carcinoma achieves clinical and pathological response rates, and survival outcomes comparable to those of the cisplatin based combination chemotherapy schemes. Our data suggest that a carboplatin based regimen can be considered a reasonable alternative for cisplatin unfit patients in the preoperative setting.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22901581     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Treatment Approaches for Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  David J Einstein; Guru Sonpavde
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11

2.  Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Homayoun Zargar; Patrick N Espiritu; Adrian S Fairey; Laura S Mertens; Colin P Dinney; Maria C Mir; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Michael S Cookson; Niels-Erik Jacobsen; Nilay M Gandhi; Joshua Griffin; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Nikhil Vasdev; Evan Y Yu; David Youssef; Evanguelos Xylinas; Nicholas J Campain; Wassim Kassouf; Marc A Dall'Era; Jo-An Seah; Cesar E Ercole; Simon Horenblas; Srikala S Sridhar; John S McGrath; Jonathan Aning; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jonathan L Wright; Andrew C Thorpe; Todd M Morgan; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Scott North; Daniel A Barocas; Yair Lotan; Jorge A Garcia; Andrew J Stephenson; Jay B Shah; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Philippe E Spiess; Peter C Black
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  The utility of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus carboplatin followed by immediate radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hiromi Murasawa; Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Atsushi Imai; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Ikuya Iwabuchi; Masaru Ogasawara; Toshiaki Kawaguchi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Bladder Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes From a Single Institution Experience.

Authors:  Andrew R Leone; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Gregory J Diorio; Pranav Sharma; David Boulware; Scott M Gilbert; Julio M Powsang; Jingsong Zhang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Michael A Poch
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine-carboplatin versus gemcitabine-cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Bas W G van Rhijn; Peter C Black; Laura S Mertens; Sarah M H Einerhand; Anna J Black; Homayoun Zargar; Adrian S Fairey; Colin P Dinney; Maria C Mir; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Michael S Cookson; Niels-Erik Jacobson; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Nikhil Vasdev; Evan Y Yu; Evanguelos Xylinas; Wassim Kassouf; Marc A Dall'Era; Srikala S Sridhar; Jonathan S McGrath; Jonathan Aning; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jonathan L Wright; Andrew C Thorpe; Todd M Morgan; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Scott North; Daniel A Barocas; Yair Lotan; Petros Grivas; Jorge A Garcia; Andrew J Stephenson; Jay B Shah; Siamak Daneshmand; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.661

6.  Chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma in renal transplantation patients: Initial results from a single center.

Authors:  Yichen Zhu; Jing Xiao; Yuwen Guo; Jun Lin; Lei Zhang; Y E Tian
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-30

7.  Improving the outcome of patients with muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder with neoadjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy: A single institution experience.

Authors:  Faraj El-Gehani; Scott North; Sunita Ghosh; Peter Venner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer in the elderly: navigating the trade-offs of risk and benefit.

Authors:  Noam A VanderWalde; Michelle T Chi; Arti Hurria; Matthew D Galsky; Matthew E Nielsen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Tislelizumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy as first-line adjuvant treatment for locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xiang Ren; Yiqun Tian; Zhixian Wang; Jing Wang; Xing Li; Yisheng Yin; Ruibao Chen; Ying Zhan; Xiaoyong Zeng
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.090

10.  A prospective study to examine the accuracies and efficacies of prediction systems for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yoichiro Kato; Hitoshi Zembutsu; Ryo Takata; Tomohiko Matsuura; Renpei Kato; Mitsugu Kanehira; Kazuhiro Iwasaki; Noriyuki Yamada; Toyomasa Katagiri; Tamotsu Sugai; Tomoaki Fujioka; Yusuke Nakamura; Wataru Obara
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.967

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.