C Federau1, S Sumer, F Becce, P Maeder, K O'Brien, R Meuli, M Wintermark. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland, christian.federau@chuv.ch.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging is an MRI perfusion technique that uses a diffusion-weighted sequence with multiple b values and a bi-compartmental signal model to measure the so-called pseudo-diffusion of blood caused by its passage through the microvascular network. The goal of the current study was to assess the feasibility of IVIM perfusion fraction imaging in patients with acute stroke. METHODS: Images were collected in 17 patients with acute stroke. Exclusion criteria were onset of symptoms to imaging >5 days, hemorrhagic transformation, infratentorial lesions, small lesions <0.5 cm in minimal diameter and hemodynamic instability. IVIM imaging was performed at 3 T, using a standard spin-echo Stejskal-Tanner pulsed gradients diffusion-weighted sequence, using 16 b values from 0 to 900 s/mm(2). Image quality was assessed by two radiologists, and quantitative analysis was performed in regions of interest placed in the stroke area, defined by thresholding the apparent diffusion coefficient maps, as well as in the contralateral region. RESULTS: IVIM perfusion fraction maps showed an area of decreased perfusion fraction f in the region of decreased apparent diffusion coefficient. Quantitative analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in both IVIM perfusion fraction f (0.026 ± 0.019 vs. 0.056 ± 0.025, p=2.2 · 10(-6)) and diffusion coefficient D compared with the contralateral side (3.9 ± 0.79 · 10(-4) vs. 7.5 ± 0.86 · 10(-4) mm(2)/s, p=1.3 · 10(-20)). CONCLUSION: IVIM perfusion fraction imaging is feasible in acute stroke. IVIM perfusion fraction is significantly reduced in the visible infarct. Further studies should evaluate the potential for IVIM to predict clinical outcome and treatment response.
INTRODUCTION: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging is an MRI perfusion technique that uses a diffusion-weighted sequence with multiple b values and a bi-compartmental signal model to measure the so-called pseudo-diffusion of blood caused by its passage through the microvascular network. The goal of the current study was to assess the feasibility of IVIM perfusion fraction imaging in patients with acute stroke. METHODS: Images were collected in 17 patients with acute stroke. Exclusion criteria were onset of symptoms to imaging >5 days, hemorrhagic transformation, infratentorial lesions, small lesions <0.5 cm in minimal diameter and hemodynamic instability. IVIM imaging was performed at 3 T, using a standard spin-echo Stejskal-Tanner pulsed gradients diffusion-weighted sequence, using 16 b values from 0 to 900 s/mm(2). Image quality was assessed by two radiologists, and quantitative analysis was performed in regions of interest placed in the stroke area, defined by thresholding the apparent diffusion coefficient maps, as well as in the contralateral region. RESULTS: IVIM perfusion fraction maps showed an area of decreased perfusion fraction f in the region of decreased apparent diffusion coefficient. Quantitative analysis showed a statistically significant decrease in both IVIM perfusion fraction f (0.026 ± 0.019 vs. 0.056 ± 0.025, p=2.2 · 10(-6)) and diffusion coefficient D compared with the contralateral side (3.9 ± 0.79 · 10(-4) vs. 7.5 ± 0.86 · 10(-4) mm(2)/s, p=1.3 · 10(-20)). CONCLUSION: IVIM perfusion fraction imaging is feasible in acute stroke. IVIM perfusion fraction is significantly reduced in the visible infarct. Further studies should evaluate the potential for IVIM to predict clinical outcome and treatment response.
Authors: Werner Hacke; Anthony J Furlan; Yasir Al-Rawi; Antoni Davalos; Jochen B Fiebach; Franz Gruber; Markku Kaste; Leslie J Lipka; Salvador Pedraza; Peter A Ringleb; Howard A Rowley; Dietmar Schneider; Lee H Schwamm; Joaquin Serena Leal; Mariola Söhngen; Phil A Teal; Karin Wilhelm-Ogunbiyi; Max Wintermark; Steven Warach Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-12-25 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Chelsea S Kidwell; Reza Jahan; Jeffrey Gornbein; Jeffry R Alger; Val Nenov; Zahra Ajani; Lei Feng; Brett C Meyer; Scott Olson; Lee H Schwamm; Albert J Yoo; Randolph S Marshall; Philip M Meyers; Dileep R Yavagal; Max Wintermark; Judy Guzy; Sidney Starkman; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Max Wintermark; Pina C Sanelli; Gregory W Albers; Jacqueline A Bello; Colin P Derdeyn; Steven W Hetts; Michele H Johnson; Chelsea S Kidwell; Michael H Lev; David S Liebeskind; Howard A Rowley; Pamela W Schaefer; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Greg Zaharchuk; Carolyn C Meltzer Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Eddie Surer; Cristina Rossi; Anton S Becker; Tim Finkenstaedt; Moritz C Wurnig; Antonios Valavanis; Sebastian Winklhofer Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Manus J Donahue; Eric Achten; Petrice M Cogswell; Frank-Erik De Leeuw; Colin P Derdeyn; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Audrey P Fan; Rashid Ghaznawi; Jeremy J Heit; M Arfan Ikram; Peter Jezzard; Lori C Jordan; Eric Jouvent; Linda Knutsson; Richard Leigh; David S Liebeskind; Weili Lin; Thomas W Okell; Adnan I Qureshi; Charlotte J Stagg; Matthias Jp van Osch; Peter Cm van Zijl; Jennifer M Watchmaker; Max Wintermark; Ona Wu; Greg Zaharchuk; Jinyuan Zhou; Jeroen Hendrikse Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: S M Wong; W H Backes; C E Zhang; J Staals; R J van Oostenbrugge; C R L P N Jeukens; J F A Jansen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 3.825