Literature DB >> 24838308

The indirect modification of categorical knowledge.

Donald Homa1, David Rogers, Matthew E Lancaster.   

Abstract

The present study investigated whether the later learning of a category could affect the representation of other categories learned previously. Participants initially learned two or three categories, where each stimulus was composed of features that were distinctive to a category, shared with one or both of the other categories, or were idiosyncratic. When two categories were initially learned, a subsequent learning phase involved the learning of a third category that either shared distinctive features with categories learned previously, thereby discounting those features as diagnostic or was composed of features unrelated to the original categories. A common transfer test contained old, new, and prototype stimuli for classification, as well as critical items that revealed whether discounting of previously diagnostic features had occurred. The results revealed that stimuli assigned to a particular category in the two-category condition were assigned to the third category learned subsequently when the later learning discounted previously diagnostic features. These results suggest that later learning of a category can indirectly modify the representation of categories learned previously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24838308     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0662-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning.

Authors:  R L Goldstone; M Styvers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-03

2.  Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.

Authors:  Safa R Zaki; Robert M Nosofsky; Roger D Stanton; Andrew L Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; John Paul Minda
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Limitations of exemplar models of multi-attribute probabilistic inference.

Authors:  Robert M Nosofsky; F Bryabn Bergert
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.

Authors:  Donald Homa; Michael J Proulx; Mark Blair
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 8.  Connectionist models of recognition memory: constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The training and transfer of real-world perceptual expertise.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Tim Curran; David L Sheinberg
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-02

10.  Initial training with difficult items facilitates information integration, but not rule-based category learning.

Authors:  Brian J Spiering; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.