Literature DB >> 24838109

MR imaging with metal artifact-reducing sequences and gadolinium contrast agent in a case-control study of periprosthetic abnormalities in patients with metal-on-metal hip prostheses.

Gunilla M Müller1, Sven Månsson, Markus F Müller, Thord von Schewelov, Mathias Nittka, Olle Ekberg, Björn Lundin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To apply and compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metal artifact reducing sequences (MARS) including subtraction imaging after contrast application in patients with metal-on-metal (MoM) hip prostheses, investigate the prevalence and characteristics of periprosthetic abnormalities, as well as their relation with pain and risk factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two MoM prostheses (35 cases with pain and or risk factors, and 17 controls) in 47 patients were examined in a 1.5-T MR scanner using MARS: turbo spin echo (TSE) with high readout bandwidth with and without view angle tilting (VAT), TSE with VAT and slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC), short tau inversion recovery (STIR) with matched RF pulses, and post-contrast imaging. The relations of MRI findings to pain and risk factors were analyzed and in five revised hips findings from operation, histology, and MRI were compared.
RESULTS: TSE VAT detected the highest number of osteolyses. Soft tissue mass, effusion, and capsular thickening were common, whereas osteolysis in acetabulum and femur were less frequent. Contrast enhancement occurred in bone, synovia, joint capsule, and the periphery of soft tissue mass. There was no significant relation between MRI findings and pain or risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: MARS and gadolinium subtraction imaging are useful for evaluation of complications to MoM prosthesis. TSE VAT had the highest sensitivity for osteolysis. Contrast enhancement might indicate activation of aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL). Pain, small head, or steep prosthesis inclination angle are not useful predictors of periprosthetic abnormalities, and wide indications for MR follow-up are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838109     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-014-1893-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  19 in total

1.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.

Authors:  L M White; J K Kim; M Mehta; N Merchant; M E Schweitzer; W B Morrison; C R Hutchison; A E Gross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Monitoring pelvic osteolysis following total hip replacement surgery: an algorithm for surveillance.

Authors:  S David Stulberg; Richard L Wixson; Angela D Adams; Ronald W Hendrix; Jeffrey B Bernfield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Early clinical failure of the Birmingham metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is associated with metallosis and soft-tissue necrosis.

Authors:  B Ollivere; C Darrah; T Barker; J Nolan; M J Porteous
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

4.  Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  J S Suh; E K Jeong; K H Shin; J H Cho; J B Na; D H Kim; C D Han
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Total inhomogeneity correction including chemical shifts and susceptibility by view angle tilting.

Authors:  Z H Cho; D J Kim; Y K Kim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting MR imaging.

Authors:  Reto Sutter; Erika J Ulbrich; Vladimir Jellus; Mathias Nittka; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Aseptic lymphocyte-dominated vasculitis-associated lesion: a clinicopathologic review of an underrecognized cause of prosthetic failure.

Authors:  Tyler Steven Watters; Diana M Cardona; K Sunil Menon; Emily N Vinson; Michael P Bolognesi; Leslie G Dodd
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements.

Authors:  A P Davies; H G Willert; P A Campbell; I D Learmonth; C P Case
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue.

Authors:  Hollis G Potter; Bryan J Nestor; Carolyn M Sofka; Stephanie T Ho; Lance E Peters; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  SEMAC: Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction in MRI.

Authors:  Wenmiao Lu; Kim Butts Pauly; Garry E Gold; John M Pauly; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  An illustrative review to understand and manage metal-induced artifacts in musculoskeletal MRI: a primer and updates.

Authors:  J P Dillenseger; S Molière; P Choquet; C Goetz; M Ehlinger; G Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Advanced metal artifact reduction MRI of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants: compressed sensing acceleration enables the time-neutral use of SEMAC.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; Benjamin Fritz; Gaurav K Thawait; Esther Raithel; Wesley D Gilson; Mathias Nittka; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Updates in postoperative imaging modalities following musculoskeletal surgery.

Authors:  Pushpa Bhari Thippeswamy; Meena Nedunchelian; Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran; Dylan Riley; Harman Khatkar; Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-09-30

4.  Comparisons of slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting magnetic resonance imaging and traditional digital radiography in evaluating chronic hip pain after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yimin Ma; Panli Zuo; Mathias Nittka; Xiaoguang Cheng; Hongyi Shao; Chen Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  [Metallic Artifacts on MR Imaging and Methods for Their Reduction].

Authors:  Hye Jung Choo; Sun Joo Lee; Young Han Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2020-01-31

Review 6.  Imaging in Hip Arthroplasty Management Part 2: Postoperative Diagnostic Imaging Strategy.

Authors:  Charles Lombard; Pierre Gillet; Edouard Germain; Fatma Boubaker; Alain Blum; Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Romain Gillet
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.